Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Crowbot

macrumors 68000
Original poster
May 29, 2018
1,841
4,152
NYC
I'm looking for a monchrome laser printer that will fit into a small space. I don't need any other features other than AirPrint compatible. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
 
Please give the dimensions of the space it needs to fit into.
Exact dimensions aren't critical. Something like 15" wide and 6" tall. Not one of the big monsters. I just need to print from my Mac and iOS devices. TIA.
 
Exact dimensions aren't critical. Something like 15" wide and 6" tall. Not one of the big monsters. I just need to print from my Mac and iOS devices. TIA.
been using a Brother HL-2370DW for about 1.5 years now, very happy with it, works fine from my Mac and my wife's Windows computer ... probably as compact as it gets...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
been using a Brother HL-2370DW for about 1.5 years now, very happy with it, works fine from my Mac and my wife's Windows computer ... probably as compact as it gets...
Thanks! Looks perfect. And it's black. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jz0309
Not my thread but following due to a sim. need & the size works for me but no scan capability, hmmm ........
 
We've been using a Samsung SL-M2020w printer for a bit over five or six years now. Only consumable has been toner. Left on 24/7 and never had an issue.

WiFi networked, AirPrint and the print form that Android uses (whatever it's called). I believe it was around $200 when I got it.

Samsung also has a color version, which we bought about a year after the M2020. Same deal with that one - just replacing toner.


71nI9czc0rL._AC_SL1500_.jpg718JqmL5omL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Not my thread but following due to a sim. need & the size works for me but no scan capability, hmmm ........
Yeah I thought about that. But I discovered that scanning with my phone is much more convenient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agile55
Thanks! Looks perfect. And it's black. :)
You might want to double-check the specs.

I didn't find specs for an HL-2370DW, only HL-L2370DW(XL). It doesn't list AirPrint as a supported protocol.

However, Apple lists the HL-L2370DW(XL) in their lengthy list of AirPrint printers:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agile55
You might want to double-check the specs.

I didn't find specs for an HL-2370DW, only HL-L2370DW(XL). It doesn't list AirPrint as a supported protocol.

However, Apple lists the HL-L2370DW(XL) in their lengthy list of AirPrint printers:
I am actually using AirPrint with mine…
 
Yeah I thought about that. But I discovered that scanning with my phone is much more convenient.
Yea, I used to have multifunction ink printers before this but have been using my iPhone for scanning for a few years, so didn’t miss that capability. iPhone is simpler…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crowbot
You might want to double-check the specs.

I didn't find specs for an HL-2370DW, only HL-L2370DW(XL). It doesn't list AirPrint as a supported protocol.

However, Apple lists the HL-L2370DW(XL) in their lengthy list of AirPrint printers:
Thanks, I will check those specs.
 
I heard good things about Brothers. They are workhorses and Brother doesn't do anything ethically questionable with their printers. See


For a review.
There was a time where Brother printers did not play ball very well with graphic design programs such as QuarkXPress. Granted, not a lot of people use QXP anymore and this was years back. InDesign had the advantage of leveraging its PDF engine (essentially a software RIP) to print.

Wonder if things have changed.
 
There was a time where Brother printers did not play ball very well with graphic design programs such as QuarkXPress. Granted, not a lot of people use QXP anymore and this was years back. InDesign had the advantage of leveraging its PDF engine (essentially a software RIP) to print.

Wonder if things have changed.
My needs are much simpler. Literally a couple of pages a month. That's why I'm switching from ink jet. The darn thing would always be gummed up and half of the ink went to head cleaning. And the color inks mysteriously disappeared in spite of my always printing mono. (I suspect that the printer uses a tiny bit of color ink in each print.)
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
My needs are much simpler. Literally a couple of pages a month. That's why I'm switching from ink jet. The darn thing would always be gummed up and half of the ink went to head cleaning. And the color inks mysteriously disappeared in spite of my always printing mono. (I suspect that the printer uses a tiny bit of color ink in each print.)
FWIW, at ~ 1 1/2 yrs old still on the tower that came with the printer, the Brother
 
We've been using the prior version of this one since 2020, no issues.

This looks good. If only it wasn't white. ;)
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
It seems a lot of low-cost printers these days are switching to ink subscriptions as a source of revenue. This began with ink-jets, where it's all but standard practice, but it also appears to be happening with laser printers. Inks dry out, so there's at least an argument that having new ink cartridges monthly may be an advantage. I don't think that can be justified with toner, unless there's something unusual about it.

I would avoid any printer that requires a toner subscription, especially if the toner is ONLY available as a subscription. A printer that offers toner cartridges for single purchase is the way to go.

I've never had a toner cartridge expire or "go bad", even after years of being installed. If a toner cartridge expires just because it's past the end of the subscription, then that's a needless recurring cost, especially in low-volume uses. Even if the printer costs a bit more up-front, the recurring costs won't be an ongoing drain.
 
It seems a lot of low-cost printers these days are switching to ink subscriptions as a source of revenue. This began with ink-jets, where it's all but standard practice, but it also appears to be happening with laser printers. Inks dry out, so there's at least an argument that having new ink cartridges monthly may be an advantage. I don't think that can be justified with toner, unless there's something unusual about it.

I would avoid any printer that requires a toner subscription, especially if the toner is ONLY available as a subscription. A printer that offers toner cartridges for single purchase is the way to go.

I've never had a toner cartridge expire or "go bad", even after years of being installed. If a toner cartridge expires just because it's past the end of the subscription, then that's a needless recurring cost, especially in low-volume uses. Even if the printer costs a bit more up-front, the recurring costs won't be an ongoing drain.
Agree. I'm sick of ink jet printers. As you noted, ink carts just don't stand up to aging. And there are only a few grams of ink, in spite of the size of the cart. I see Epson is selling a printer with large inkjet cartridges so things may go in the other direction.
At this point I would consider a color laser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agile55
Will echo Brother. Onto my second one as the old one was no longer compatible with newer MacOSes. Using a 2350DW currently.

And scanners: yeah, I too use Notes as not needing complex scanning. A page or two here every now and then. Can also scan via Dropbox, OneDrive, Google Drive, Adobe Scan, etc, etc. Lots of options if needs are simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crowbot
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.