Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Thor is not an office. Thor is a person. Frigga gave birth to Thor. As tempting as it might be this holiday season, try sending some strange woman over to the in-laws' family gathering and have her say she holds the "office" of the husband while you are hanging out with your friends watching the game (and thus unworthy).

Now, "Defender of Asgard" is an office. Thor, the son of Odin and Frigga, could become unworthy or incapable of holding that office and it could be passed to someone else. Freya, for example, is very entertaining in Norse mythology, and certainly not above apply a smackdown if need be. I could get behind a series where Freya was wielding Mjolnir against the forces of evil, as long as it wasn't some lame ass "Thor got hooked on drugs" storyline. Of course, Freya is a nordic goddess and would likely be blonde and buxom. If you want a Latina goddess, consult a different mythology.

Similarly, the "heavy hitter" in a super group is an office. For example, in the Fantastic Four, this is traditionally Ben 'the Thing' Grimm, but it has been Hulk, She-hulk, and Mr. Incredible in various incarnations (if you believe The Incredibles is a good FF movie :) ). A Mjolnir wielding Freya (or Sif) could serve as that role in the Avengers.

I do not object to replacing heroes with minorities. I object to trying to replace her identities. In the BSG reboot, I was intrigued by the female Starbuck. Then Ron Moore went and ruined it. That character had almost nothing in common with her namesake. She was supposed to be the best pilot in the fleet and likable. Instead, she winds up being whiny, neurotic, drug addicted, and suicidal. What happened to "her and Apollo are going to be friends, not lovers?" Oh yeah, that line made it ALMOST to S2, but S1 was a short season. THIS isn't making a female version of a character. This is stealing a few names and events for your story so you can capitalize on someone else's success (and possibly because you do not have enough original ideas to finish out your story).

No, I don't like all the Captain Americas. Its the Green Lantern Corps, so they're ok (except Kyle Rainer- he's annoying). I don't mind Rhodes filling in as Iron Man (or War Machine) in the Avengers, but he is NOT Tony Stark. He is his own man. Spiderman isn't an office. The Ghost Rider is kind of an office. We've seen references to "the rider" in the past. I also kinda of like the LA Latino version going on in Agents of Shield. I don't mind She-hulk filling in for Grimm in the FF, but she ISN'T Ben Grimm.

Looked at another way, this is like saying "Minorities aren't interesting enough to be their own characters. We have to steal someone else's name and fame or no one will care about them." It seems to me like that would be more insulting than giving them their own characters.

Luke Cage, Jean Grey, Wonder Woman, Sam Wilson, Jon Stewart and others have all managed to hold their own with their own names.

Interesting characters and stories will sell. When your sales pitch is 'I had to steal someone's name to get your attention,' I am thinking that is spelled with a silent '...because it wasn't good enough to stand on its own.'
 
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava
Thor is not an office. Thor is a person. Frigga gave birth to Thor. As tempting as it might be this holiday season, try sending some strange woman over to the in-laws' family gathering and have her say she holds the "office" of the husband while you are hanging out with your friends watching the game (and thus unworthy).

Now, "Defender of Asgard" is an office. Thor, the son of Odin and Frigga, could become unworthy or incapable of holding that office and it could be passed to someone else. Freya, for example, is very entertaining in Norse mythology, and certainly not above apply a smackdown if need be. I could get behind a series where Freya was wielding Mjolnir against the forces of evil, as long as it wasn't some lame ass "Thor got hooked on drugs" storyline. Of course, Freya is a nordic goddess and would likely be blonde and buxom. If you want a Latina goddess, consult a different mythology.

Similarly, the "heavy hitter" in a super group is an office. For example, in the Fantastic Four, this is traditionally Ben 'the Thing' Grimm, but it has been Hulk, She-hulk, and Mr. Incredible in various incarnations (if you believe The Incredibles is a good FF movie :) ). A Mjolnir wielding Freya (or Sif) could serve as that role in the Avengers.

I do not object to replacing heroes with minorities. I object to trying to replace her identities. In the BSG reboot, I was intrigued by the female Starbuck. Then Ron Moore went and ruined it. That character had almost nothing in common with her namesake. She was supposed to be the best pilot in the fleet and likable. Instead, she winds up being whiny, neurotic, drug addicted, and suicidal. What happened to "her and Apollo are going to be friends, not lovers?" Oh yeah, that line made it ALMOST to S2, but S1 was a short season. THIS isn't making a female version of a character. This is stealing a few names and events for your story so you can capitalize on someone else's success (and possibly because you do not have enough original ideas to finish out your story).

No, I don't like all the Captain Americas. Its the Green Lantern Corps, so they're ok (except Kyle Rainer- he's annoying). I don't mind Rhodes filling in as Iron Man (or War Machine) in the Avengers, but he is NOT Tony Stark. He is his own man. Spiderman isn't an office. The Ghost Rider is kind of an office. We've seen references to "the rider" in the past. I also kinda of like the LA Latino version going on in Agents of Shield. I don't mind She-hulk filling in for Grimm in the FF, but she ISN'T Ben Grimm.

Looked at another way, this is like saying "Minorities aren't interesting enough to be their own characters. We have to steal someone else's name and fame or no one will care about them." It seems to me like that would be more insulting than giving them their own characters.

Luke Cage, Jean Grey, Wonder Woman, Sam Wilson, Jon Stewart and others have all managed to hold their own with their own names.

Interesting characters and stories will sell. When your sales pitch is 'I had to steal someone's name to get your attention,' I am thinking that is spelled with a silent '...because it wasn't good enough to stand on its own.'

Why are you so mad about this? What part of you is so angry about a woman, and a latina one to boot taking up the fictional role of Thor?

I think I can guess, but I'd love to hear you explain it.
 
Why are you so mad about this? What part of you is so angry about a woman, and a latina one to boot taking up the fictional role of Thor?

I think I can guess, but I'd love to hear you explain it.

I thought I explained it okay the first time, but here goes..

If you are guessing that I think dumb ideas are annoying, you are spot on. If you think I object to female superheroes (or Latina or LGBT or left handed), then you failed at reading comprehension. As stated, I do not object to a Latina woman taking up the fictional role of "Defender of Asgard" while Thor, son of Odin, is otherwise unable to do so.

Thor is a fictional character that I happen to like. Having that fictional character replaced with a different fictional character and being told it is the same fictional character is annoying. I am not screaming mad about it. I am not engaging in protest marches about it. I just do not like it and stated as much with all the effort it takes to make a forum post.

I personally would find it offensive if they "rebranded" an existing character to match my demographic rather than actually creating a character that did. Oh look, they made Captain X to look like me and have tried to ret-con it to say it was always like that, because everyone loves a ret-con. No thanks.

That, and, in case you missed it, I generally dislike tearing down heroes and making them 'unworthy' (especially with really, really, really tired addiction storylines).

Maybe you are grateful to the comic industry for that sort of thing.

Why are you so mad that someone made a forum post with an opinion different than your own? Am I not entitled to like a fictional character? Am I not entitled to dislike the changes made to said character? If they changed a character YOU like in a way you did not like, maybe you would be angry, too.

I think I can guess how you would react, but I do not need to hear you explain because I believe fully in your right to have that position. I have even defended your right to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solomani
I thought I explained it okay the first time, but here goes..

If you are guessing that I think dumb ideas are annoying, you are spot on. If you think I object to female superheroes (or Latina or LGBT or left handed), then you failed at reading comprehension. As stated, I do not object to a Latina woman taking up the fictional role of "Defender of Asgard" while Thor, son of Odin, is otherwise unable to do so.

Thor is a fictional character that I happen to like. Having that fictional character replaced with a different fictional character and being told it is the same fictional character is annoying. I am not screaming mad about it. I am not engaging in protest marches about it. I just do not like it and stated as much with all the effort it takes to make a forum post.

I personally would find it offensive if they "rebranded" an existing character to match my demographic rather than actually creating a character that did. Oh look, they made Captain X to look like me and have tried to ret-con it to say it was always like that, because everyone loves a ret-con. No thanks.

That, and, in case you missed it, I generally dislike tearing down heroes and making them 'unworthy' (especially with really, really, really tired addiction storylines).

Maybe you are grateful to the comic industry for that sort of thing.

Why are you so mad that someone made a forum post with an opinion different than your own? Am I not entitled to like a fictional character? Am I not entitled to dislike the changes made to said character? If they changed a character YOU like in a way you did not like, maybe you would be angry, too.

I think I can guess how you would react, but I do not need to hear you explain because I believe fully in your right to have that position. I have even defended your right to it.

Yep. Dogwhistle racism disguised as concern trolling, what a shame.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.