Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I subscribe through Apple because I don’t want Netflix to grab all my details that they then sell for more profit.

Forcing me to give you my details Netflix will drive me away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seanrt
Looks like someone is becoming very nervous about someone sniffing around with over a quarter of a $ Trillion dollars in cash reserves. ;););)

A trillion dollar valuation is not equal to having a trillion dollar in cash reserves. Apple doesn't even have the $29X-$3XX million in cash reserves so commonly thrown around here (when you deduct the ever-growing debt that what was once debt-free Apple has been accumulating the last few years). Look it up if in doubt.

But yes, if I'm Netflix, I'm a bit uncomfortable seeing Apple making moves toward my space. And yes, if I'm Netflix- or any app with revenue streams- I'm always looking for ways to grow my own revenues instead of enriching some other company. Any amount taken "right off the top" is a (first) bite right out of gross profits.

If this was the other way, none of us would be finding any fault with Apple maneuvering to reclaim profits from some other source. In fact, it's very likely we would be faulting that other source as ripping off Apple by daring to take so much of Apple's revenue... AKA "how dare they?" when any company is trying to make more money possibly at Apple's expense (even indirectly) or in the way of Apple domination or any market in which Apple plays.
 
Last edited:
This probably just means that Netflix is worried about their costs vs. revenue in the future. It remains to be seen if the model they're using can actually sustain itself in the long run. Netflix could very easily just flame out.
Netflix is profitable as is. This is probably their way of further increasing profits. Just because a company is doing okay doesn't mean they aren't always striving to increase profits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: connormw
Right, and Netflix if going down that path. Like I said, why wouldn't more companies just do this? Its coming, more will follow. It's not that difficult to open up the browser on your phone, go to Netflix, sign up and then use that content on your phone. I do it with Audible, I have a monthly subscription with them, that I can only do via their website, but I can listen too all the books I get via that services on my iPhone. I agree with others, 30% for first year and then 15% after that, it's called High-Way Robbery.

I don't have an Android phone, wonder what their policy's are for these types of services?
I believe the Google Play store allows for other payment options. So an app developer can use Google for payment processing (where Google would get a cut) or offer their own payment option.
[doublepost=1534863994][/doublepost]
Understand their reasons but it's a bit much to describe it as "improving the Netflix experience".
Does Netflix charge more if you subscribe in-app like Spotify does? If so then yes this would be improving the experience.
 
I subscribe through Apple because I don’t want Netflix to grab all my details that they then sell for more profit.

Forcing me to give you my details Netflix will drive me away.
What details will Netflix get that they don't already have? I imagine they have your name already, which is probably (along with your IP) enough to match you against tons of other sourced data out there. Unless you're suggesting Netflix sells your payment info, which is simply untrue.
 
Good for them. The bulk of Netflix's costs are going to be content licensing and bandwidth,

Content licensing haha have you watched Netflix lately? It’s filled chock o block wall to wall with poor man Netflix original copies of the shows we really want. Instead of paying for the shows we want they make a substandard copy.
Netflix are laughing all the way to the bank.
This is about getting our details to fill and form their databases so they can sell us for more profit.
Subscribing through Apple protects us. They want us out of that protection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seanrt
you're misreading it.

Apple allows for services purchased elsewhere to be used on APple devices.

What they forbid is intentionally linking you from inside the App to an external site for purchasing. So as long as Netflix doesn't take you out of the App, or provide you a "PURCHASE SUBSCRIPTION BY THIS LINK" they aren't technically violating Apples rules

Currently how Amazon and B&N for exampl are doing it
But it also states that they have to provide in app purchases in this case.
 
I guess this part is what confuses me about the policy and maybe others.

I think what that says is that any service that is available for purchase externally, must also be available for use on the iOS app. Not necessarily saying that if you sell it on the site, yo must also sell it in App.
 
What details will Netflix get that they don't already have? I imagine they have your name already, which is probably (along with your IP) enough to match you against tons of other sourced data out there. Unless you're suggesting Netflix sells your payment info, which is simply untrue.

How do they have my name?

iTunes protects us from that stuff. Apple doesn’t share ****.
[doublepost=1534864412][/doublepost]
What details do you think they get that they don't get if you are billed through iTunes?

See reply above.
 
It’s their loss. Most people like me subscribe from iTunes. They will lose lots of people.

Subscribers such as myself do so via the web app itself. Now I'm just perpetual yet I do download shows/movies to watch later on iOS/AppleTV.

Good for them. The bulk of Netflix's costs are going to be content licensing and bandwidth, neither of which Apple provides any benefit. Why should Apple take 30% off the top of an already low gross profit margin business for doing nothing more than acting as a payment mediator?

Maybe this will trigger a discussion where developers who want to offer payment through an in-app purchase can get closer to what Apple or the vendor actually gets charged for running the transaction through the customer's credit card itself. I can guarantee it is less than 3%.

Interestingly enough the main reason for Netflix to place on the iOS App Store / Google Play Store (which it failed to mention anything in this article ... is for users/subscribers.

Netflix - Let's inconvenience them (subscribers) to get more revenue.
Result: A few users leave the platform and look for the multitude of alternatives:
Marvel is pulling a LOT o content from Netflix
Disney is pulling a LOT of content from Netflix.
- users: Let's all get an Android box or use old school BitTorrent and just not pay a dime!

Yeah this is going to work long term well. Netflix has gotten large and fat over the years ...YET their overspending for production of movies and shows that unfortunately is NOT getting the viewing rates or subscribers growth that they once had.


https://www.bloomberg.com/view/arti...rnings-subscriber-growth-disappoints-faithful

July 16, 2018, 5:40 PM EDT
The tricky thing is if there are cracks in the belief system, the whole religion is tested. That is what happened to Netflix on Monday when it reported adding about 670,000 net new U.S. streaming subscribers in the second quarter — about half as many as the company had forecast. Including disappointing customer growth outside the U.S., the company’s 5.15 million net streaming sign-ups fell short of Netflix’s own forecast from April by more than a million subscribers. Its third-quarter subscriber forecasts were also below the average expectations of stock analysts.



Netflix lives or dies by its subscriber growth, which is both a financial imperative and proof for the company’s faithful. Given the company’s high-risk strategy of splurging on programming to become a global entertainment powerhouse, nothing else matters at Netflix except for the pace of new paying customers, and the company’s investors react accordingly. Predictably, shares of Netflix plummeted 13 percent in after-hours trading Monday after it released quarterly earnings.

- The company spent an astonishing $10.1 billion on cash programming costs in the last 12 months; 4.5x what HBO spent in 2017 on buying or producing its movies and TV shows.
- The costs for marketing Netflix programming also nearly doubled to $1 billion in the first six months of 2018 from a year earlier ...
- In all, Netflix has committed to spending an astonishing — that word again — $18 billion in coming years for its entertainment programming.
-
Subscriber growth isn’t a cherry on top of Netflix’s sundae; without the growth, there is no sundae.

Shows I watch:
Altered Carbon
Anon
Suits
... nothing else appeals to me really.

Movies:
all the big action blockbuster hits.

* And to think Netflix was a Video Tape Vending machine company at Blockbuster long ago? Curious if that brand could be brought back again to heavily compete? Hmmm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zxxv
It’s their loss. Most people like me subscribe from iTunes. They will lose lots of people.
how so? Giving Apple 30% is massive chunk and I never used in app purchases for subscription and this will certainly not deter people from using netflix. After all, you only need to subscribe once and please don't tell me people are so damn lazy these days to go on a website and do it from there.

I can safely say that those lazy slackers will still amount for less revenue lost than the 30% Apple is taking right now.

So good on Netflix, I would have done this ages ago.
[doublepost=1534864636][/doublepost]
So Netflix sacrifices user experience for their greed.
really? How often do you use this "feature"? I would rather that Netflix uses the extra 30% to improve the film collection and services then lose a massive chunk of money because people are so damn lazy these days
 
I’m sure they actually operate as a business and have monitored the in app subscription situation for a while.

Some will have been introduced to the platform as new, and that is where in app subscriptions would have gained new customers. But once you are at a certain critical mass the costs may become to much and you have build up enough of affinity to retain the majority of such customers whilst accepting you may loose a few. Decisions will be made based on an analytical model of such situations.

I don’t see a problem with this. And Netflix has got subscriptions through many different channels and resellers. For example ours comes through our broadband package.
 
Lmao, right. I promise you most people don’t subscribe to Netflix through iTunes. Nobody who wants to subscribe to Netflix will avoid doing it because you can’t do it through iTunes, if you think that’s the case you’re living in your own little universe. The only one who will lose out is Apple, losing out on fees they aren’t entitled to anyway and should have never received.
Apple is the one running the credit cards which is about 3% for Visa/Mc/Amex/Discover and hosting the apps which server space isn’t free. They should take a 5-10% cut but not 15-25%.
 
I do Netflix via carrier billing. It's 2018, it's not that hard to bypass the App Store payment process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ingik
You only sign up once. Not difficult to sign up via the browser. And I’m sure Netflix would offer signup in the app if Apple allowed them to do so without taking a cut.
People are lazy. Why Apple is so successful with the in-app purchases to begin with? Any extra steps to make a purchase is an inconvenience.
Beside, it's Apple's platform, either play by Apple's rules or do HTML5 web app. Amazon took the other road by not playing with Apple from the get go on their Kindle and streaming services, thus their customers are already trained as such. Netflix now has to re-train their customers. We'll see if this affect them negatively or not.
 
If Apple ever removed Netflix, I would just get a cheap android tablet to view Netflix. Therefore I doubt Apple would be stupid enough to remove Netflix.
 
  • Like
Reactions: booksacool1
how so? Giving Apple 30% is massive chunk and I never used in app purchases for subscription and this will certainly not deter people from using netflix. After all, you only need to subscribe once and please don't tell me people are so damn lazy these days to go on a website and do it from there.

I can safely say that those lazy slackers will still amount for less revenue lost than the 30% Apple is taking right now.

So good on Netflix, I would have done this ages ago.
[doublepost=1534864636][/doublepost]
really? How often do you use this "feature"? I would rather that Netflix uses the extra 30% to improve the film collection and services then lose a massive chunk of money because people are so damn lazy these days
You cannot run a business if you are blaming your customers. Like it or not, consumer behavior wants convenience. Besides, the 30% is optional. Amazon opted out from the get go. Netflix could've done the same, but clearly greed takes a while to sink in.

Oh well, not that I care. Stopped paying netflix way back.
 
My Apple Stock loves that Apple makes money, but I have always felt it is wrong for Apple to require 15 - 30% of subscription fees. For services like Netflix, Apple provides very little with a great return. This just lowers Netflix's profits and encourages Netflix to have to raise their rates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rom3o
Same with the Kindle. You buy the book on Amazon, and read it using the IOS app on your i-device.
Makes me wonder how Apple makes money from the Kindle app. You can’t buy kindle books with the app. It’s stricly for reading ebooks you already purchased elsewhere and the app itself is free.
 
Last edited:
You only sign up once. Not difficult to sign up via the browser. And I’m sure Netflix would offer signup in the app if Apple allowed them to do so without taking a cut.

Nope. Sub, unsub when content gets boring which happens often with the drivel they put out these days. Then resub at a flick of a button.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.