Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't think $300 on a $499 machine is a "bit more". We aren't talking about $25 here...

Yes, but why would you add $300 to the entry level machine? It's a model that used to cost $599, and for $200 more you get the mid level machine which already has 8GB of RAM, and a faster CPU.
 
Apple thrives on hardware sales. A user who bought 4GB and finds his machine slow in 2/3 years will then have no choice but to fork out $x00 to Apple for an upgrade versus $60 to some generic RAM vendor on Newegg. Also, Apple is and considers itself as the biggest power player in the technology industry. They own the balance of power, not consumers who will rush out and buy whatever.

They failed once before and almost died by doing this kind of crap. I sure hope that won't happen again because i really like Mac OS X and iOS.
 
Here's the solution: just buy it with the maximum amount of RAM. That way you would never have needed to upgrade anyway. Sure it will cost you a little bit more but it's not a big deal.
...
LMAO, you are the perfect buyer for big companies.
 
Yes, the $3000 Mac Pro is out of range.

The point of the $5000 PC reference is to illustrate that the iMac is not even on the radar. If I'm not buying a $3000 Mac Pro due to price, the fact that I'd consider a $5000 PC over a $200 iMac is an illustration that the iMac isn't even a possible contender. If you can read between the lines, and I know that's hard for a blind defender, the point being I would go without a computer before I'd touch another iMac.

Not a blind defender, as I am disappointed with the new mac mini as well. Just pointing out that your ranting was inconsistent. So, cut off your nose, go without a computer. Yeah, right.

----------

Lets face it....2-core machine with 8G of Ram is still good machine for coding, web and mobile development. My iOS applications compile and build in Xcode very fast. When writing web code...it is so basic that 2010 machine can do it without a sweat. When i run pixelmator (mind you, it is basic) it gives me no problem (HD4000 graphics).
My friend runs professional design company (basically...he uses adobe products like photoshop, indesign, etc...) all day long on his 2-core i5 with 16G of RAM and is doing just fine.
Sure 4 core is good, but don't make it out like 2 core is useless machine. It is still professional machine....just not for 3D rendering and huge vide editing and rendering.
My Macbook air 2012 with dual core i5 and 8G of RAM is still going strong and is very fast. No need to upgrade for at least 2 years. But that is based on my needs (mobile and web development with light photo editing).

Bingo. The outrage is reminding me of the "Apple is done" rantings when the iTunes app icon changed. We lived. Most people who claim they cannot survive without a quad core probably can.
 
For me the soldered RAM is not such a big deal. The lack of quad core is more annoying. Apple is trying to push people to get iMac for anything other than a media PC. It's almost like Mac mini was too good and eating up the margins of the more profitable iMacs, and they had to downgrade it.

The thing being that Apple is possibly the only desktop PC maker on the planet that is making money from that product line. It is the consumers' right to demand more for less, but it is also the suppliers' right to go out of business (IBM desktops: not clear that even Lenovo is making money on those now). Apple has the sales and marketing data and from their perspective seems to be doing a good job of keeping the product line profitable.
 
Contradictory information from Apple store

Apple store in Stockholm, Sweden, says the new mini is upgradable.

Reading this article I quickly cancelled my order of a 2.8 mini with 8 Gb RAM. I was planning at upgrading if needed, when needed (for less money). This afternoon I called the Apple store and asked if they had 16 gb RAM units in-store since I had heard that the RAM was soldered, or if I needed to order from the web. After the woman consulted a fellow "genius" she said that the easiest would probably be for me to order online, but I could also go to the store and buy it and they would install the extra 8 gb as I waited.

I probably should have been more persistant in confirming this, but my first assumption was that she didn't have a clue. Reading more in this forum I am a bit baffled that the article is referring to "a source" and not that the soldered RAM is a fact. The mini is out, surely someone can open it and take a pic. 'Til then I won't make any decisions.
 
I'd be interested to know what percentage of buyers upgrade their own RAM. I'd be willing to bet that it's single-digit percentage.

We have to remember that this is a machine targeted at the general consumer and most consumers are NOT upgrading their own RAM. They order their computers as-is with the options they want and they never upgrade them.

Those of us that upgrade our own represent a very small number of their overall buyers. Apple is making these machines with the general consumer in mind, not us.
 
Wtf!

If they had only done this with the base model, I might be OK with it. But they only gave the base model 4GB of RAM. Five or six years ago, I thought 4GB of RAM was a lot. Not anymore. Both of my Macs (MacBook Pro and Mac mini late 2012) have 16GB of RAM installed. For me, that's now the minimum. I'm looking forward to MacBook Pros that come with 32GB installed or more. My guess is that Apple thinks that the Mac mini is only purchased by people who have no interest in upgrading. They're totally wrong. I bought my Mac mini late 2012 in February 2013. I immediately upgraded it to 16GB of RAM, purchased from Crucial because Apple's RAM upgrades are overpriced. Later on, I bought a Mac mini dual drive kit from iFixit, and installed a solid state drive while leaving the original 500GB drive installed. It's a great system. Sure, it doesn't have the processing power of my late 2013 MacBook Pro, but it runs everything I do very well. The Mac mini has been a great system for someone who wanted to pay a lower price for a great computer, and then upgrade it into something better. I love Apple, but I don't understand why they're so offended by customers wanting to upgrade hardware. Some of us like to have a lower price of entry, and then over time, pay more to upgrade the system to fit our changing needs.
 
Apple thrives on hardware sales. A user who bought 4GB and finds his machine slow in 2/3 years will then have no choice but to fork out $x00 to Apple for an upgrade versus $60 to some generic RAM vendor on Newegg. Also, Apple is and considers itself as the biggest power player in the technology industry. They own the balance of power, not consumers who will rush out and buy whatever.

That's not true at all. I personally know quite a few people who had waited ages for a new Mac Mini and simply decided not to bother with this new model as it doesn't meet their needs.

Apple can do no wrong with the iThings as they are the best in their class but Apple are making a real mess of looking after their real staunch customers who have been buying Apple gear for 10-20 years+.
 
My late 2012 Mini looks better than the new specs,at least i have a quad core i7 processor,nothing else is worth laying out for.

Guess that means i can save up for the new watch when they are available.
 
Macworld UK's 'first look' at the new mini seems to confirm this also: "Apple has told us you will not be able to add more RAM after purchase as you could previously", they say.

It is a shame, the entry price is about the only real positive news for these minis - it is a good thing that there's a mac available new this inexpensively again. It's just a shame they appear to have hobbled its former editions' potential.
 
If they had only done this with the base model, I might be OK with it. But they only gave the base model 4GB of RAM. Five or six years ago, I thought 4GB of RAM was a lot. Not anymore. Both of my Macs (MacBook Pro and Mac mini late 2012) have 16GB of RAM installed. For me, that's now the minimum. I'm looking forward to MacBook Pros that come with 32GB installed or more.

So what is the limit in your estimation, when is there no need for more ram any more? It seems absurd to me to suggest that this would just continue to be a pressing need outside of special purpose applications.
 
I don't know what else other than they probably get a lot of tech support calls from people that install cheap 3rd party memory in these and it costs too much to handle calls that the customer could have avoided by installing Apple memory instead because this is a low end Apple product and customers typically try to save a buck by installing cheap 3rd party memory.


I wouldn't be so sure on that. The one I have in comes with a 10year warranty, better timings than the stock version, quality brand name instead of some generic Apple/Hynix No-Name RAM - and that at a price point of €100 instead of €300. And those people who actually "tincker" with their minis are the ones who go for "more power" with "good" components (thinking of professionals and gamers in the first place) while having some decent "computer-hardware-skills"
 
Apple are terrible. Just awful people.

I guess: 'We must stop people going the Hackintosh route...' isn't on their radar.
 
Last edited:
my 2010 Mac Mini with 240 GB SSD, 4 GB of RAM, and DVD player farts on all your newer models :D:cool:;):mad::p

I AM EL BURRO (OOOOOOOOO)

133262843_17493c7531.jpg
 
Mac RUMORS

Well I"m going to wait for tear down and speed test reports before I make any conclusions.
 
Last edited:
I'd be interested to know what percentage of buyers upgrade their own RAM. I'd be willing to bet that it's single-digit percentage.

We have to remember that this is a machine targeted at the general consumer and most consumers are NOT upgrading their own RAM. They order their computers as-is with the options they want and they never upgrade them.

Those of us that upgrade our own represent a very small number of their overall buyers. Apple is making these machines with the general consumer in mind, not us.

Are these tidbits of knowledge based on any facts or research you can link to, or just your personal perception of the general consumer?

What is a "general consumer" and if they don't upgrade their RAM to increase the performance of their PC over time, what class of consumer makes up the sector that feeds the huge after-market memory industry?

When I look at laptop memory upgrades on Amazon, it amazes me how many of the reviews are for people with Macbooks. Apparently someone is upgrading their RAM and many are Apple product owners.
 
That's not true at all. I personally know quite a few people who had waited ages for a new Mac Mini and simply decided not to bother with this new model as it doesn't meet their needs.

Apple can do no wrong with the iThings as they are the best in their class but Apple are making a real mess of looking after their real staunch customers who have been buying Apple gear for 10-20 years+.

I am not disputing your friends' choices at all. But Apple does not seem to care about them anymore. They are a huge corporation now and have enough people rolling over to buy whatever they put out that they no longer need to care if they keep or lose their "enthusiast" customers - the "problem" customer syndrome.
 
Apple: 'Damn, why do people love that little low-end piece of crap so much? No margin on that sucker. Let's just make it a real POS so they'll buy an iMac.'

Mac Mini buyers: Gonna have to go hackintosh.
 
I wouldn't be so sure on that. The one I have in comes with a 10year warranty, better timings than the stock version, quality brand name instead of some generic Apple/Hynix No-Name RAM - and that at a price point of €100 instead of €300. And those people who actually "tincker" with their minis are the ones who go for "more power" with "good" components (thinking of professionals and gamers in the first place) while having some decent "computer-hardware-skills"

Agreed. Apple doesn't manufacture RAM, so there's no such thing as "Apple" RAM. They're just sticking their name on Crucial (Micron) or another supplier's RAM.
 
Apple wants you to pick your final configuration at the initial time of purchase so that you may need to upgrade later on? Shocking. They've never done this before....:rolleyes:
 
Truth is, most users never upgrade hardware after purchase. And while I don't like the premium Apple places on RAM and HD upgrades, I doubt many people will be turned off buying one because it won't allow an upgrade they are unlikely to do.

Yeah, they get family members to do it. I have upgraded 7 macs for family members. I now advice all family members that they can not upgrade after purchasing, and they all think it is stupid and anti-consumer. They are second guessing on whether to stick with Mac or not. And I can't blame them. Currently, I have a user upgradeable iMac, and two user upgradeable MBPs, the newest is the last 15" non-retina one. Last month, I advised my mother to get the 2012 mini with quad core. I was worried, but knew apple would make it difficult/impossible to upgrade the mini with a revamp. But removing the quad is a damn joke.

Apple's approach is very anti-consumer because they are charging more for less now, and making the products disposable. Bad move, and I suspect I am not alone in being tech support for a large extended family of Macs.

Sorry apple, you are blowing it when it comes to your computers.

And the claims of being Greener, when these machines will easily not last as long as user upgradeable ones, means more and more in the landfill that in the past. One step forward, two steps back.
 
Last edited:
I fail to see the word "SOLDERED" mentioned anywhere on the source page??? Non user accessible is not the same as soldered...

The previous style of Mac Minis all required a complete removal of the case in order to upgrade the RAM. It was definitely too much for average people to take on, but with the right tool (spackle knife) it was a breeze.

I feel like someone jumped to a conclusion just because perhaps the logic board was slightly redesigned making the RAM door on the bottom no longer available.
 
It's just a matter of time before Apple removes all RAM upgrade capabilities from their computers.

The 27" iMac and the Mac Pro are the only ones left. And I'd surmise we'll see those go away in 2 years and only offer soldered RAM.

Great, give the PC wonks something else to hate on.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.