Can anyone who is saying this increases speed or security elaborate on that point?
From my perspective, you have a logic board with as bunch of traces going from one chip to another. You can either solder memory directly to that board or you can solder a connector to the traces and then plug the memory into the connector.
Can someone explain how the first method introduces any security or speed improvements that are otherwise lost in the latter?
I'm not an advocate of the soldering always "increase speed security" theory, but I don't think that "assertion" is really about how to design specifically an Apple T2 SSD.
It appears to be more wrapped up in the other major subtext that appears in many of the comments on this story's comments about commodity, replaceable SSDs in a socket versus the general T2 approach.
There are two approaches to doing a T2 implementation. Generally a "laptop" way and a "desktop Pro" way. The "desktop Pro" why still has the T2 (and the SSD controller along with the security keys) soldered to the logicboard.
The commodity approach of putting the SSD controller on the detachable card There are security gaps there. In the Mac space though that isn't really a relevant issue because the T2 attached in both approaches. Detachable opens "man in the middle" attack vectors if give physical access to the Mac internals.
Increased speed is more inexplicably hand wavy. There is perhaps some "princess and the pea" difference in shorter , less height changing traces. But highly unlikely any of that shows up to the CPU after hopping through the T2 and I/O chipset (PCH).
The current Mac Pro 2019 tech specs boast of
" Up to 3.4GB/s sequential read and 3.4GB/s sequential write performance."
See all the technical specifications for Mac Pro with the M2 Ultra chip.
www.apple.com
while the MBP 16" 2019 specs boast of
" Up to3.2GB/s sequential read speed
2 "
MacBook Pro laptop with M4, M4 Pro, and M4 Max chips. Built for Apple Intelligence. Up to 24 hours of battery life. Liquid Retina XDR display.
www.apple.com
The Mac Pro's NAND chips are not soldered and the MBP 16's are. So much for the whole "soldered speed thing". These two systems were released about the same time with the same SSD implementation tech and the non soldered NAND approach has no problem keeping up.
There have been times where Apple laptop SSD tech moved forward faster than the desktop. ( e.g., when the Mac Pro product development is comatose for 5-6 years that isn't hard). As Apple dropped out of doing their own complete SSDs as 'cards" to going to a fully soldered approach in the laptop. It becomes relatively easy to come to the wrong causal conclusion that the soldering was a significant part of the speed increases over time. ( as opposed to better SSD controller and newer NAND tech. ).