Same here—currently installing a major update on my old Surface Pro 2 running Windows 11.I have an unsupported system with Windows 11 installed and it receives updates.
Same here—currently installing a major update on my old Surface Pro 2 running Windows 11.I have an unsupported system with Windows 11 installed and it receives updates.
you would fool to spend $400 dollar extra for base M2 model that is slower than base M1 MacBook Air...
But this should not happen in first place. Apple has audacity to charge more for a new product that is actually slower than old product. I don't think this should be overlooked, frankly.
If what you do is not actually that demanding, why would you need spend that kind of money for something you don't need?
Just in case anyone was wondering what the speakers are like, they're worse than the M1. Definite backwards step, not even subjective IMO. Heard them both side by side this morning in Curry's (UK electrical store).
Because I can and I want a new MacBook.
It’ll be the same for many others so just because I want to browse the web and watch Disney plus, doesn’t mean I have to buy an acer.
Just because you think a $1000+ laptop is only for 8K video editing, doesn’t mean the rest of the world does.
It’s a MacBook Air aimed at the average user, Not the Pro users. Something MANY reviewers have FAILED to understand.
2006? That’s so recent! Why did you get rid of your older stuff? How dare you be so wasteful!You can and you want DOES not mean you should. This is complete waste of money. I CANNOT understand why would you want to do that.
And what is wrong with Acer? I have my oldest PC which I brought around 2006, and it is still turning on and functioning correctly. And my most recent Acer with Skylake processor runs just as fast as any Skylake based Mac.
We are in a complete wasteful society where people think it is okay just to dump a completely useful system because fancier new things.
I cannot change you and I cannot change other people. I will continue use my old Intel system, because it just serve me fine.
You can and you want DOES not mean you should. This is complete waste of money. I CANNOT understand why would you want to do that.
It is subjective. What you stated was your opinion not fact. In my opinion, the speakers sound much better than my M1 MBA.Just in case anyone was wondering what the speakers are like, they're worse than the M1. Definite backwards step, not even subjective IMO. Heard them both side by side this morning in Curry's (UK electrical store).
I like the form factor though: I'm definitely not nailing myself to a cross just because they've abandoned the wedge design. Two refreshes from now, this is what people will just accept MBAs look like and the door-wedge form factor will date the M1 and earlier models. Screen was brighter.
2006? That’s so recent! Why did you get rid of your older stuff? How dare you be so wasteful!
I mean, what could people possibly need to do in their workloads to justify anything, I don’t know, built in the last 3 years? Only everything.
That just tells me you prefer a barely-there indistinct bass, an ill-defined soundstage that varies depending how much you tilt the screen (because the speakers rely upon bouncing sound off it) whereas the M1's soundstage was almost 3D, and a very rolled-off top end, which again, varies depending on how you tilt the screen. Which of course is your preference, but in no way is it objectively better.It is subjective. What you stated was your opinion not fact. In my opinion, the speakers sound much better than my M1 MBA.
You don’t know what I prefer. I have practical expectations with sound coming from a laptop. I am not expecting theater quality. We disagree and that is fine.That just tells me you prefer a barely-there indistinct bass, an ill-defined soundstage that varies depending how much you tilt the screen (because the speakers rely upon bouncing sound off it) whereas the M1's soundstage was almost 3D, and a very rolled-off top end, which again, varies depending on how you til the screen. Which is your preference, but in no way is it objectively better.
We'll just have to be adult and agree to disagree.
Because it's something else they've made objectively worse M1>M2, but I'm not saying it's wrong to prefer the M2 Air's sound, because everyone has a preference.Why are people bitching about speakers? Don't the majority of MBA users use headphones or airpods?
This sums up what I would have said had I understood what I wanted to sayan ill-defined soundstage that varies depending how much you tilt the screen (because the speakers rely upon bouncing sound off it) whereas the M1's soundstage was almost 3D, and a very rolled-off top end, which again, varies depending on how you tilt the screen.
NP I got your back...This sums up what I would have said had I understood what I wanted to say![]()
That's what I fear and have seen reviewers state the same M2 needs the dual channel 512 SSD & 16GB RAM to get the best out of the SOC, versus the M1 which could manage with 256/8. At such pricing the 14" MBP simply cant be ignored as it brings more features & performance to the table at the cost of some portability for just around $100 more for me at Apple's pricing....My wife is taking my Midnight M2 MBA 8/10/8/512 back for me. 8GB Ram isn't going to cut it. They have a space grey 8/10/16/1TB in stock, so will swap it with that. Only money right @Aoligei ?
MKBHD is correct the major issue with the M2 Air is the price...
TBH if an M2 Air was my primary I'd spend, not happily but for the same reasons as I value the portability and battery life. Coming from the M1 13" it's not worth it for me at this present time.Absolutely, it's just priced all wrong. But I am Sticking with it. The 14" has more features and is the better value. But as I travel far and wide the lower weight makes a difference, to me at least, so does the longer battery life. I have to go upwards to ensure it gives me the best performance and more than I need which prices above the MBP 14, that is just wrong.
That's what I fear and have seen reviewers state the same M2 needs the dual channel 512 SSD & 16GB RAM to get the best out of the SOC, versus the M1 which could manage with 256/8. At such pricing the 14" MBP simply cant be ignored as it brings more features & performance to the table at the cost of some portability for just around $100 more for me at Apple's pricing....
I'll stick with the M1 and look at the details when the 14" moves up a gen or workload demand's more performance. MKBHD is correct the major issue with the M2 Air is the price...
Q-6
to me this is super simple... apple knows anyone serious will buy the 16g and 512 model anyway, basically same price as the soon to be outdated 14 proThen why not increase the base model to 512? Doubt Apple has too many issues with supply or pricing given the volume & status. If I opted for a base M2 Air I'd be seeing a downgrade in performance versus my M1 MBP. If coming from an older Intel Mac likely ok for basic use, however the reduced flexibility of the base models is pretty well illustrated as the YT channel is showing reasonable real world tasks not just repeated benchmarks.
Had Apple gone with the duel channel 512 drive they would have gained a lot of favour. I suspect they don't want the M2 Air & MBP to be too close to the more expensive 14" & 16" MBP as many bought the original M1's as stopgap yet found them more than powerful enough so never upgraded.
Q-6