Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
New AirPods Pro Feature Lossless Audio With Vision Pro and Additional Dust Resistance
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yeah, I actually used Compact Cassettes with Dolby B and then Dolby C as the 1980s hit. And most still sounded worse than modern digital. I loved LPs, but as the oil crisis went on, they got thinner and thinner and the the vinyl got worse, so you would get warps and crackles. I remember CDs being a major improvement just for the lack of noise, but I do recall some complaints that the early CDs were mastered like they still used the RIAA Curve. We used to pay $25 for CDs when LPs were only $10, so someone must have thought they sounded better. LP prices now are breathtaking.
This keynote was really terrible. It seems like they’ve virtually forgotten to mention the most important stuff. Lmao.
Last edited:
Speak for yourself. My parents and grandparents had 2 ****** stereo speakers hooked up to old stereo. I have a Dolby atmos 5.1.2 home theater system that sounds incredible🤷🏻♂️
Except that AptX was not lossless at that time. But of course you knew that.
True lossless over BT barely exists at this point, but we may get it, eventually.
I tried aptX Lossless Bluetooth – and yes, we can all look forward to it (with caution)
A step in the right direction for Bluetooth
But aren’t all AirPods, including both APP 2 and APP 2 USB-C, all still just Bluetooth at their core? Specifically, it’s the H2 chip and Bluetooth 5.3 for APP 2.
But it’s all wireless via Bluetooth, and, surely, Apple Vision Pro cannot alter the hardware of APP 2 USB-C, but will just transmit audio to them like any other Apple device?
Or do APP 2 USB-C and Apple Vision Pro have some undisclosed wireless radio that we don’t know of?
If APP 2 Lightning and APP 2 USB-C have the exact same hardware internals, apart from their respective charging ports, then the Lightning version is only limited artificially via software, not anything else.
As it stands, it doesn’t add up unless it’s a sales strategy and not an actual hardware limitation for APP 2 Lightning.
Exactly. Really confusing as it’s just a side note for APP 2 USB-C, not a headline.
Gotta save something for the companion iPhone to the Vision Pro next year. The iPhone Pro Ultra
Well he has been dead for long. We also used to think 720p HD looked incredible
They did, for about two seconds. I thought they were talking about older ones.
It was compared to file sharing sites lie Napster which always had bit rates all over the place and people were copying files and then converting them to a different format and then re-uploading them and converting them and re-uploading them to make it appear as if it were a higher bitrate. Compared to how things are now, it was a crappy bitrate.
Back in the day, when I was younger and didn’t quite know how not to spend money, I had a Nakamichi BX-300. If any cassette deck out there could sound like a CD, that was the one. That thing sounded magical.
I used to load AIFF files on my original iPod, I think I could fit around 30 songs on it and the buffer was always so full that the hard drive would run constantly.
Lol I feel even worse than you guys who got the AirPod Pro 2's when they came out last year considering I got AirPod Pro 2's like..a month ago 
if I'm not too worried about USB C (already have to carry the lightning for my phone...), am i missing any other features? I'm getting mixed messages about the lossless; is it only the USB C thats supporting it or the lightning will too?
Thirdly, the new lossless would only be for the Vison Pro?
if I'm not too worried about USB C (already have to carry the lightning for my phone...), am i missing any other features? I'm getting mixed messages about the lossless; is it only the USB C thats supporting it or the lightning will too?
Thirdly, the new lossless would only be for the Vison Pro?
And I sure won't buy the same AirPods twice. Would have bought an USB-C case however.
Why is Apple so cramped up?
I agree in principle but thanks to modern mastering choices I think there is a strong argument that music sounds worse than it did say in the 80s. Nothing to do with codecs or formats but maybe these mastering choices are why it is harder to tell a 256AAC from 24/192 FLAC. Also the overall quality iof your earphone counts too(driver, processing etc) just because your $50 earbuds do lossless does not mean they will sound better, the whole chain counts.
I'd take a well mastered version at 256 AAC over brickwalled 24/192 all day long. Everythng else being equal though I also think that CD quality is more than good enough.
Straying into another conversation though. As for the OP I am interested as to exactly how Apple will implement lossless into the bluetooth equipped APP, even if I do not really care!
Last edited:
We are most likely jumping to conclusions on this topic. I highly doubt the actual hardware of the earbuds is any different between the AirPods Pro 2 (Lightning) and AirPods Pro 2 (USB-C). This sounds to be exclusive to when you combine Vision Pro + AirPods Pro 2, most likely as a result of range restrictions when operating in "lossless" mode, just like how Sonys LDAC has terrible range when operating in "lossless".
I'd bet this will be available with the original AirPods Pro 2 as well via a firmware update. Doesn't make much sense for Apple to have two different revisions of the earbuds with different capabilities.
I'd bet this will be available with the original AirPods Pro 2 as well via a firmware update. Doesn't make much sense for Apple to have two different revisions of the earbuds with different capabilities.
Hang on, I’m confused.
So there are new airpods pro that have been launched with other differences, not just the usb c case? Reading earlier articles I thought the existing airpods pro were now shipping with just a new case that has usb-c but everything else was the same?
So there are new airpods pro that have been launched with other differences, not just the usb c case? Reading earlier articles I thought the existing airpods pro were now shipping with just a new case that has usb-c but everything else was the same?
Not sure why people are bringing up 24-bit at 192kHz. Pretty much all digital music has been using 16-bit at 44.1kHz. This already covers about twice the dynamic range a perfect human ear can hear. None of us above 20 years have anything close to perfect hearing, to begin with, and even if you somehow have perfect hearing, it still covers lower and higher frequencies than your perfect ear can hear.
What possible reason would Apple have to waste range and bandwidth by going 24-bit at 192kHz? This is like asking for Thunderbolt 5 when you are only connecting a 5400 RPM external hard drive. Utterly useless. It's even more useless when talking about codec for your wireless earbuds as the meaningless high bandwidth needed for 24-bit at 192kHz isn't only wasteful itself, but this will directly affect the range and power usage.
What possible reason would Apple have to waste range and bandwidth by going 24-bit at 192kHz? This is like asking for Thunderbolt 5 when you are only connecting a 5400 RPM external hard drive. Utterly useless. It's even more useless when talking about codec for your wireless earbuds as the meaningless high bandwidth needed for 24-bit at 192kHz isn't only wasteful itself, but this will directly affect the range and power usage.
I'm surprised they haven't dual-stacked Bluetooth & their own new wireless audio protocol. Seems like the obvious thing to do, given their Ultra Wideband custom silicon. Maybe they're ramping up to do it? Or maybe Bluetooth 6 will have a 2nd set of frequencies using a different technology.