$200 for a fancy remote is cheap compared to what's out there. Check out Phillip's Pronto line. The cheapest is $199 and they go up to $1699!!!Originally posted by bokdol
ok how funny would this be. a unversal remote to control are your devices that connect to your digitalhub. but it has to be prced in the 200 dollar range because it's more then a remote.![]()
Originally posted by Chef Ramen
i want it, whatever it is![]()
Originally posted by Richmond
The only connection on a powerbook & not on other machines is Firewire 800...hmmm....
Since when do Apple display's have SVideo connectors?Originally posted by beatle888
if its only for the display or powerbook could that mean that it needs the Svideo connector for some reason. why else wouldnt the powermac be able to use it. that part just doesnt make sense.
Why would you connect such a thing via firewire?Originally posted by illumin8
My guess is that this is an 802.11g Airport that you can simply plug into a Firewire port on your PowerMac or PowerBook that will transmit a Remote Desktop out to the future iTablet device. That would certainly make sense. Offer a low-cost adapter that enables your PowerMac or PowerBook to wirelessly publish it's desktop out to multiple wireless tablets with zero configuration. Just plug it in and you're ready to go.
Also, this makes it very easy to wirelessly enable your home without any networking skill or ability. Combine this with OS X 10.3 which is supposed to support multiple graphical logins, and you're set.
My thoughts are - Mac OS X Server will allow educational institutions to connect up to 50 tablets to an Xserve per server license. Regular Mac OS X will only allow 5 simultaneous remote desktops. This is to keep you from overloading your desktop system, as well as to keep businesses from buying a dual 1.42ghz. PowerMac and cheating Apple out of licensing fees for OS.
Originally posted by eric_n_dfw
Why would you connect such a thing via firewire?
What about the Airport Extreme card in (or available to) most Mac's today? (And sure to be added to the iMac, iBook and 15" PowerBook soon)Originally posted by illumin8
High bandwidth connection that is common to every current Mac model. Plus it leaves your Gigabit ethernet port free for Internet access on your main machine. 90% of the usefulness of the tablet will be browsing the web from your sofa. Here's a sample diagram:
Cable Modem -> PowerMac/PowerBook -> Wireless tablet adapter -> - - - - - <- Wireless tablet
Originally posted by jazzdog
I don't know if this has been discussed before - but what if Apple is headed towards a new model of personal/home computing. One in which instead of one computer per user, there were one computer with multiple wireless client nodes. (one per family member) When they talk about 10.3 supporting multiple acounts/logins maybe they mean multiple SIMULTANEOUS users. This would definitely leapfrog them past the Windows world.