Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Facial recognition technology???
Oh great, now the government can scan millions of faces and track everyone by hacking into their GPS. Just brilliant. I can't wait to see how the American Civil Liberties Union responds to this one. What's next, full body scans? "The government has detected that you need to lose weight. Your debit card will no longer be able to purchase more than $5 worth of food each day...also, you were short by $2.35 on last years income taxes. We know this is your friend's cell phone, but we recognized your face." :eek: :eek: :eek:

I agree with your sentiments, but you are naive, they already got you pegged from date of birth, from buying your contact and a millions other things you wouldn't image, the echelon isn't waiting for effing apple to come up with face recognition just to to tap you, it's been doing a very good job at it since back when they did it with paperwork and sticking cards into rooms of computers, they never missed anyone they didn't want to go missing....


The rest is for the naive.
 
How about using facial recognition as a form of log-on

Here's a suggested use for facial recognition: when you turn on your Mac, the webcam automatically detects your face and logs you in. This would take the place of logging on using a password or fingerprint recognition. Different members of the family could be recognized without assigning everyone a different password. It could also take a picture of people who aren't recognized and are trying to gain access to the system. :cool:
 
Facial recognition . . . not what I was expecting. It watches me while I'm watching it? And then sends my face and location to the government, right?!?!

Since they don't already have your photo from drivers licenses, passports, etc etc etc.... :rolleyes: I've got a spare roll of tinfoil if you'd like a hat.:p

Proving once again that sarcasm doesn't come through on forums. I'm not crazy!! Honest!
 
But anyone with common sense knows that you don't always see patents come to market.

Then no patent can truly predict a front-facing camera, can it?

But you're right. Apple certainly didn't bring motion-detecting menus to 3.0 (or at least not so far). It would be cool to see any of their patents, though. This and a haptic iPhone? Awesome!
 
"Unread Message Alerts: An application filed January 3rd, 2008 covers the ability for a device to automatically provide unread message alerts when a user is about to contact another party."


You've got to be kidding me. In my opinion, things like this are what bring the whole patent system into disrepute.

The idea that a piece of software will notify you of any pending unread messages to a recipient when you start to send them a new message, is a patent-able idea is--for lack of a better phrase--patently absurd.

Basically you're talking about patenting code like this:

Code:
if (inbox.getAllUnreadMessagesBy(recipent).size() > 0) { 
     displayUnreadMessages(inbox.getAllUnreadMessagesBy(recipent));
}

... which is over-simplified pseudo-code. But as a developer, I must say, that while it's a cool idea... it's also a ridiculously "evolutionary" not "revolutionary" idea, which is contrary to what the patent system was designed for.

If Apple is granted this patent, I'm going to spend a few days writing a simple mail client with the express purpose of infringing on this patent out of spite, if for no other reason than I find it horribly offensive.

If this is the standard by which patents can be granted--as a developer--I should go on a binge of patenting absolutely every stupid unique idea that I can possibly come up with. Every other developer can too, and we'll end up not being able to develop pretty much any software anymore because the whole bloody industry with be so encumbered with a patent on every possible software idea that we'll all inevitably trip over each others patents and we can all spend our time suing each other instead of developing software.

If the patent system was this badly abused in the 1960's and 1970's during the rise of computing, we never would have come as far as we did today. Somebody could have patented the idea of a code compiler, and then we'd have no C programming language, because that would violate that patent. Everyone else would be stuck writing machine code or paying a royalty for the right to use the idea of a compiler.

Or someone could have patented the idea of transmitting digital messages over a network of computers, and then the whole internet would have been encumbered by a cluster**** of royalties.

This type of crap needs to end.
 
... they did work on the battery -- 12 hours of talk time on 2G sounds great to me! Who talks on the 3G network? Why would you? Only switch to 3G when you need the net, dude and you've got tons of talk time!

I'd find it very useful if the phone could recognise when it was on the office wifi, and automatically switch to 2G. Longer battery, but more importantly the 3G reception is dodgy and I miss calls or they drop out.

However, this would disable push notifications, which use 3G.

Profiles..
I have no 3G or WiFi reception at my office, so unless I switch these off, my battery is near empty by the time I get home.

So i can with a few gestures select an "office" mode and everything off apart from the phone and Edge.

Selecting an "office" mode in your situation would be useful. Would it work if it scanned local bluetooth devices and found something to tell it it was in the office?
 
Who on this GOD's SWEET EARTH votes negative in this story that is nothing but very intelligent patents exploring some wonderful options and uses for the iphone, even if you don't think they are worth their salt they are just patents why vote negative....:confused::eek::rolleyes:

To the extent that 1/3 voted negative.

I don't vote positive or negative... I'm not sure whether voting is supposed to mean "I believe Apple will do what is described here" vs "I LIKE this, hope it's true"

I often find myself thinking something would be very good, but not believing it'll happen. And sometimes having no doubt apple will bring something out but not caring in the slightest.
 
Facial recognition technology???
Oh great, now the government can scan millions of faces and track everyone by hacking into their GPS. Just brilliant. I can't wait to see how the American Civil Liberties Union responds to this one. What's next, full body scans? "The government has detected that you need to lose weight. Your debit card will no longer be able to purchase more than $5 worth of food each day...also, you were short by $2.35 on last years income taxes. We know this is your friend's cell phone, but we recognized your face." :eek: :eek: :eek:

... I see you're wearing a tin foil hat.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.