Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
that mode where it doesn't add things to the history or cookies is a little weird. my automatic thought was the kids being able to look at porn without it being recorded. interesting idea, but where are they going with it?

Safari has had this feature for years, Mozilla recently added it to Firefox, and I'm not sure but I bet Opera has this mode as well. And yes, it is considered "porn-mode" by most people.
 
You should know Chrome first have awesome bar. Firefox's awesome bar (i mean the extension) was just copying Chrome's idea.

Firefox's "Awesome Bar" was basically a rip off of Chrome's Omnibox, so yes. Most people seem to think Google's works better anyway.
.

you guys making such ignorant lies, its disgusting.

Chrome was first introduced in Sept of 2008, Firefox had awesomebar developed and released in public as 3.0a8 back in Sept of 2007.

and not to mention, awesome functions are so much more, and useful than chrome's urlbar.

plus, if you obviously don't even know what awesome bar was, then stop making imaginary statement filled with lies. "Most people think chrome works better?" what most people? you?

I can't believe people like these spreading lies so easily here. what do facts mean to you guys? fart?
 
I get what your saying. Of course google does keep track of what your search within it. But what I'm talking about is the fact that unlike any other browser that I know of, google chrome tracks every word, URL, and/or word phrase that you type on the address bar. Basically, it will get recorded on their servers. Now that's not cool


Your ISP knows way more about what you do online than Google does. Who do you trust more?
 
This is a well-known issue:

http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=13716

Basically they seem to be held up on how exactly to do this within their keep-everything-in-separate-processes model. Previously, they could only get the first page of a PDF to display in-line. Then they changed it to its current download-only state because at least then you could see more than one page. They're working on it, but like the bookmark manager before today, I wouldn't hold your breath.

Instead, you can try this extension, which forwards PDF links to Google's online PDF viewer. Not a perfect solution by any means, but it might help.

http://blog.arpitnext.com/gpdf

Be careful with that extension. It sends all PDF's clicked in the browser to Google Docs to display. The problem is that is sends it through the internet to Google unencrypted (http instead of https). So don't use it to display any PDF's that has personal information like SS#'s, credit card numbers, checking acct #'s, etc, etc. I think this is a big flaw and the developers of this extension should warn people about it.
 
I've been using Chrome as my primary browser for a few weeks now to see if I can make the switch. I'm finding it much more enjoyable to use than Firefox and Safari. The only reason I ever used Safari in the first place was to view PDFs in the browser, but now that Chrome has that capability, I really don't need it anymore, and I've just grown tired of Firefox.
 
I'm loving Chrome, and the update does seem nice so far.
I do have a quick question though. The top bar used to be a Grey color, which I liked very much. Now after the update it's a Blue color, a nice shade of blue but I'd rather it be grey, for less eye distractions. Does anyone know of a way to change the color back ?

Thanks
 
At last a decent Mac browser that offers extensions without being Firefox. I'm looking forward to seeing what comes out of the Chrome extension community in the near future.

It might even make me switch from Safari.
 
I've found that Chrome is sooooo much faster than every other browser I've used.
Extensions will make me happy.

I want bookmark management, though.
 
Infinitely better than that god-awful Safari that crashes on me at least 5 times a week(and also much faster than Safari). Much better ad blocker in this than in Safari too. Good job, Google. Bad job, Apple.

No, and flash being worse means im sticking with Firefox 3.6 with chromifox.


WTF are you talking about? If you're clueless, don't respond. The people that make adblock for Firefox made an Adblock extension for Chrome and it works great.

WTF are you talking about? If you're clueless, don't respond. The people that make adblock for Firefox made an Adblock extension for Chrome and it works great.

Not true. There is an Adbock extension for Chrome. But it is not from the same developer at the one for Firefox. But they both use the same bocking list and share some of the same code. But it is a good ad blocker, including Adthwart too.
 
No, and flash being worse means im sticking with Firefox 3.6 with chromifox.

Have you even used Chrome? Adblock works great (and I think is made by the same people who make it for the other browsers) and flash runs a lot better than on Safari. Additionally, each tab being it's own process means the generally crappiness of flash won't take your entire browser down anymore.

I've been running the developer preview for months now and it works great.
 
Adblock works great (and I think is made by the same people who make it for the other browsers) and flash runs a lot better than on Safari.

Chrome's Adblock extension is NOT from the same developer that makes Firefox's extension. But Chrome's Adblock is still good. I actually like Chrome's Adthwart extension better Chrome's Adblock extension.
 
that mode where it doesn't add things to the history or cookies is a little weird.

It's the same as the Private Browsing in Safari.

Anyone else notice that Google claims Chrome will be "snappier?" :rolleyes:

At my school they've been experimenting with Chrome both on PC and Mac and there are many sites that are still buggy with Chrome. But hey, competition is good.
 
Chrome's Adblock extension is NOT from the same developer that makes Firefox's extension. But Chrome's Adblock is still good. I actually like Chrome's Adthwart extension better Chrome's Adblock extension.

Ah, I see AdThwarte uses the same engine as Adblock Plus on FF.

I'm not sure the developer really matters anyways.
 
you guys making such ignorant lies, its disgusting.

Chrome was first introduced in Sept of 2008, Firefox had awesomebar developed and released in public as 3.0a8 back in Sept of 2007.

and not to mention, awesome functions are so much more, and useful than chrome's urlbar.

plus, if you obviously don't even know what awesome bar was, then stop making imaginary statement filled with lies. "Most people think chrome works better?" what most people? you?

I can't believe people like these spreading lies so easily here. what do facts mean to you guys? fart?

lol, wow, okay. I was about to apologize to ebow, who politely brought up the possibility that I was too rash in my statement earlier. But I didn't realize the issue was so offensive.

Firefox had something called an "awesome bar" in their alphas before Chrome released, but it wasn't until later with extensions and especially with 3.5 that they started catching up on the features in Google's Omnibar. It still hasn't caught up completely, if you really want to fight about it.

The "awesome bar" as you're talking about was a bookmark and history search. It didn't add full-blown internet searching until after Google did it. To my knowledge it still doesn't do key-by-key internet searching. Then you can look at Google's other features like key-by-key Google Suggest results, and the related intention-prediction and context-sensitivity Google's well-known for, that the "awesome bar" doesn't do.

There are even UI things like highlighting the most likely choice automatically so you don't have to arrow down like in Firefox that still has Chrome ahead of the game, in my opinion.

So while there are technical reasons why Chrome's bar is better, I will admit that saying "most people" is never a good idea - I apologize for that; I was in a rush. However, there are many people who find Chrome's bar more useful than Firefox, including tech writers from - off the top of my head - PC World, PC Mag, Lifehacker, eCommerce Times, Cnet, writers for the New York Times, etc. All I can say is I've had the impression that in general people that have used both prefer Chrome's bar. And I'd agree. That's all.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.