elgruga said:Now all they have to do is to make it without the CRT tube, and we have a $499 eMac and we can choose our own display.
i quite agree with you on that.
it would be funny to see a iMac dome without screen
elgruga said:Now all they have to do is to make it without the CRT tube, and we have a $499 eMac and we can choose our own display.
Hattig said:Can it do 1152x864 at all (i.e., is that an option in MacOS X*)? I've found this to be the best configuration for a 17" monitor personally - 1600x1200 is just miniscule! That would allow it to get a higher refresh rate surely (probably close to 80Hz)?
* Yeah, still waiting for a decently priced laptop before switching ... I have a feeling that the next iBook revision could be the one
They did a lot of weird stuff in the past already, so I wouldn't try to predict anything based on that logic.Whotheheck said:I think the best part about this news is that it means that the iMac should be updated soon. I mean, they can't leave the $799 eMac and $2000+ iMac with the same processor, can they?
areyouwishing said:[snip]The only reason Apple/Stevo is not doing this is because its not sexy, if they really cared about market share, they would do this.[snip]
Codemonkey said:Ummmm.... have you actually seen an eMac in person? They are _so_ not sexy. They're actually negatively sexy, sucking the sexiness out of any other sexy Mac within a 15' radius.
The eMac looks like a nose cone to an airplane.
Flyers486 said:The iMac is dead. At this point it would seem unwise for apple to try to premier a new iMac with specs comparable to the new powerbooks (the new G4s at 1.5). More likely this spells the end of the iMac (in its current form) as we know it and a new product debuting at WWDC. The cube G5, anyone?
Greg
visor said:I suspect new imacs next tuesday. Obviously you can't have a big gap in time offering a very cheap computer faster or as fast, as the expensive one. As there'll be no faster G4's, we'll have g5's single processors - makes a lot of sense. Then, the PM's will all be upgraded to double proc's making a clear destinction between educational, home use, and professional line.
Kirk said:Anyone know when the new eMacs will be available in Europe? Still no sign of it on the Norwegian Apple Store . . .
NicoMan said:I don't know if it's the same on the Norwegian store, but on the UK site there is a mention of the new emacs with the new specs and new description etc..., but on the store it is still the old models. Weird no? I guess it's because they are going to update the store today for other machines...![]()
Oh by the way, apparently if you call the Apple Store, you can order the new ones.NicoMan said:I don't know if it's the same on the Norwegian store, but on the UK site there is a mention of the new emacs with the new specs and new description etc..., but on the store it is still the old models. Weird no? I guess it's because they are going to update the store today for other machines...![]()
elgruga said:Now all they have to do is to make it without the CRT tube, and we have a $499 eMac and we can choose our own display.
NicoMan said:I don't know if it's the same on the Norwegian store, but on the UK site there is a mention of the new emacs with the new specs and new description etc..., but on the store it is still the old models. Weird no? I guess it's because they are going to update the store today for other machines...![]()
taylan said:so, if you are thinking about buying one, please take the fan noise into account. i didn't know about it before i bought it, and i was simply shocked when i first used it in my room.
http://portfolio.orangeslices.net/
Hehe...takao said:"hans...hans, the customers are asking us about new eMacs and when they will be available !"
"new eMacs ? Ok I'll check out the apple.com homepage."
stoid said:Yes, with new video cards now reaching to 256MB on the Windows side, 32 is rather lame. It would be great to be able to get a BTO for at least a 64MB card.
El Duderino said:i have a 3.0 HT P4 with a 9600 all-in-wonder (128) and when i only had 512ram it ran UT2k4 like absolute garbage, i had to shut every last program i was running just to get a decent game, not to mention it took anywhere from 3-6 minutes to load a single level.