Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It’s not an issue, market economics will dictate this.
That's not true at all. Social acceptance of the utterly ridiculous and perverse and backwards, is being pushed at high levels by extremely disturbed people, that have achieved unprecedented levels of power and influence.

I'm a very tolerant and inclusive person and have always been very much in favor of breaking down pointless old barriers to acceptance. But it has gone too far. Acceptance for some things has turned into forced acceptance of all things, and that's just wrong.
 
In some apps, like Messages, you can type a word like dog, and then switch to the Emoji keyboard, and words associated with Emojis will be highlighted gold - tap one of them and it gets replaced with the corresponding Emoji, or in some cases you can pick from variants. It’d be nice if this was more widely implemented.

I didn't know that, always wondered why some words would highlight and some others didn't. So thanks for the tip. But honestly, doesn't that prove the point how far off we are from the original intent of emoji right now? The idea was to be able to quickly convey an idea, thought or feeling without having to spell it out. Simple things like 'this was meant as a joke' or 'this makes me sad'. To be able to find the damn things I now have to.... spell them out, then tap them, then select the emoji from a list. If my significant other wants to let me know I should bring eggplant, and has to spell it out, what's the point of having an emoji for it? 🤪
 
Meh. I'll still be using the same 12 emojis that I do now. I can't be bothered to look through, what, well over 1000!! (Kinda like cable TV. 1000 channels and I watch the same 12...)
 
That's not true at all. Social acceptance of the utterly ridiculous and perverse and backwards, is being pushed at high levels by extremely disturbed people, that have achieved unprecedented levels of power and influence.

I'm a very tolerant and inclusive person and have always been very much in favor of breaking down pointless old barriers to acceptance. But it has gone too far. Acceptance for some things has turned into forced acceptance of all things, and that's just wrong.
Slippery slope here. Let the market and consumers dictate what is enough.
 
Still waiting on that Stout emoji.
Also a way to hide unused/unwanted emoji's.
I'm all for in the future, if they add an emoji, they have to remove or combine one.
 
But honestly, doesn't that prove the point how far off we are from the original intent of emoji right now? The idea was to be able to quickly convey an idea, thought or feeling without having to spell it out. Simple things like 'this was meant as a joke' or 'this makes me sad'. To be able to find the damn things I now have to.... spell them out, then tap them, then select the emoji from a list. If my significant other wants to let me know
Oh, I totally agree. I started out with emoticons on Usenet ( :-/ and such - most of the common ones get forcibly converted to emoji by the forum), long before the Internet was a thing. Half a dozen or so were great for conveying tone in text-only conversations between people who'd never met and didn't know each other's manners of speech - a wink could let someone know you were carrying forth in a sarcastic manner and help prevent a flamewar about, "how dare you espouse such a viewpoint?!?"

When they later became non-human circular yellow "faces", that was amusing. But then we had to make them look human. And then we had to make them look like every human. And then we had to represent every occupation and every pastime and every food and every animal. And we've got 30 or so different circular yellow ones intended to show various emotions and feelings and it's hard to tell the exact difference in meaning between half of them (thus, what are they really conveying, if there isn't universal agreement and understanding about what they mean). (I read an explanation once, that Japanese culture has many subtle variants on shame, and since emoji originated with Japanese phone carriers, that's why there are so many indecipherably different variants of slightly red-cheeked and/or downwards-looking emoji - I don't know if thisis actually true.)

Emoji have become a mixture of poorly thought out modern hieroglyphics (a wildly random collection of nouns with few verbs), and random stickers a child would plaster all over everything (don't get me wrong, I think modern life could use more whimsey, and I love when I get messages from my niece filled with rainbow and unicorn and princess emoji, but ... yeah, for most uses, emoji got out of hand a long time ago). It used to be that messages filled with many different fonts and colors were often an indication of someone who wasn't capable of properly expressing their ideas with actual words, now emoji have taken over that role.

(There's an old joke about, "the modern word processor has made it possible to full-justify ideas that previously could not be justified in any other way.")
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon
the emoji art style is one of the ugliest I have ever seen on the internet, it is only better than the old vbulletin smilies
 
  • Like
Reactions: iHate You
I like that emojis are getting more diverse and accepting, but why include such a niche emoji like "man in veil" when we don't have something useful (and arguably more relevant) like a condom emoji? I'm a huge advocate for safe sex, and it's driving me crazy that we still don't have a condom emoji especially in an age of Tinder and other dating apps.
I asked Jeremy for you:

A lot of organisations have suggested a condom emoji to promote safe sex – especially for dating apps and the LGBT community, yet this proposal have been turned down again and again. Why is that?

Jeremy Burge 8 hours ago
  • For an emoji to be approved by Unicode, it's good practice for there to be agreement that vendors will support the emoji. If Unicode were to approve a bunch of emojis that vendors don't add, we'd have a situation where some emojis only work on some platforms, which is a pretty bad outcome for end users who wouldn't know which are universal.

    For the condom, I can absolutely see merit in such a proposal, though I do wonder whether major tech companies would feel entirely comfortable putting this on the emoji keyboard for all ages, in all countries around the world. It's a big commitment to add any emoji, and I would speculate that some may be hesitant to bring 'sex' to the keyboard in a way it isn't at present.

    (this isn't to say it couldn't or won't happen in future)
 
Slippery slope here. Let the market and consumers dictate what is enough.
That would be great, if that were actually case. The market has been told not complain about certain things that they didn't ask for, but get anyway...or they'll be labeled a bigot, for simply opposing the inappropriate.
 
That would be great, if that were actually case. The market has been told not complain about certain things that they didn't ask for, but get anyway...or they'll be labeled a bigot, for simply opposing the inappropriate.
I say, let the emoji's come and see where this goes. Maybe for some that dislike the trend the tide will eventually turn. I personally don't care.
 
I say, let the emoji's come and see where this goes. Maybe for some that dislike the trend the tide will eventually turn. I personally don't care.
Boomers had a saying back in the day: live and let live.

And another one: do your thing.

Is that really so different from Millennials? But maybe some Boomers have lost their way 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Unfortunately for those with issues, many of the younger generations are more tolerant, inclusive and accepting—no matter how upsetting that may be to some.

If certain emojis trigger the more sensitive snowflakes amongst us, maybe don’t use them? And those that like them can use them. Everybody wins 🙂
 
I like that emojis are getting more diverse and accepting, but why include such a niche emoji like "man in veil" when we don't have something useful (and arguably more relevant) like a condom emoji? I'm a huge advocate for safe sex, and it's driving me crazy that we still don't have a condom emoji especially in an age of Tinder and other dating apps.

Let's not forget the "man in veil" is sporting a Tom Selleck mustache. Does "niche" even fit here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: otternonsense
the woke cringe is annoying and sad to see its particularly offensive with Santa as thats based on a real person (yes i realize the 13th century's Saint Nicholas is far from the modern Santa legend but im not arguing legends are based in reality)

in a lighter note why black cat why not do cat alt colors like they do skin tones, same with mammoth it should be an alt elephant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pete480
Boomers had a saying back in the day: live and let live.

And another one: do your thing.

Is that really so different from Millennials? But maybe some Boomers have lost their way 🤷‍♂️
Not sure what you're driving at. Live and let live meant: Live your own life, I won't interfere, and don't force your stupid nonsense on me.

When you start forcing your ways on other people, that's not "tolerance".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.