Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
New iMac's in 2013??

That's only 6 months away.

Reading in some of the many 'crying because no new iMac came out yesterday' threads, many people have held off buying 6 months waiting for the new iMac to come out yesterday.

Since that did not happen, they can easily wait another 6 months! LOL
 
New iMac's in 2013??

That's only 6 months away.

Reading in some of the many 'crying because no new iMac came out yesterday' threads, many people have held off buying 6 months waiting for the new iMac to come out yesterday.

Since that did not happen, they can easily wait another 6 months! LOL

Not. Laughing.
 
Imacs

To me it was a big disappointment the slight updates they did to the pros and airs... only the retina one was decent but they bump their price a little high .... they need to do a good update with a new imac that is worth the wait ..... i think apple wont be the same with out :apple:steve:apple:
 
Not. Laughing.

Me either. If a new iMac doesn't accompany the new OS in July, I'm really not sure what to do. I don't know if I can wait another 6 months. My current iMac is from 2007 I believe. I need something new but don't want to buy a 2011 at 2012 price and without updates that MAY follow in a year....
 
there better be some kind of speed bump here in a month or so. this is extremely frustrating. i am not buying a year old machine.
 
Sure its 6 months, until January.. But they might release the new iMac at wwdc june.. Thats 1 year from now
 
I don't know why the delay but all is forgiven if Apple comes out with the iMac touch. :cool: 2013 is 6 months.

Skjermbilde-2012-05-02-kl.-16.28.16.png
 
I think this is being discussed in the News section, but I'm not sure if it's been mentioned here (then again, maybe it has - there are so many "WHAT? NO NEW IMAC?!" threads)

Apple Says New Models, Designs for iMac, Mac Pro In Works, Due in 2013 (Update)

Forbes said:
Updates to add email from Apple CEO Tim Cook to a customer re: Mac Pro. Also Apple corrects to say desktop updates for 2013 applies only to Mac Pro and not iMac.

Apple said today that it is working on new models and designs for its Mac Pro desktop that will be released in 2013.

The company confirmed a New York Times report, citing an unnamed Apple executive yesterday, that new desktops are in play.

(snip)

...Cook doesn’t mention the iMac, and Pogue’s reference to an update to the iMac in 2013 is incorrect, Apple said (which probably means that you can expect an iMac update sooner. The iMac, Apple’s all-in-one-desktop originally introduced in 1998, was last refreshed in May 2011.)

(my bold)
 
I don't know why the delay but all is forgiven if Apple comes out with the iMac touch. :cool: 2013 is 6 months.

Image

That concept is dumb though, that would be something Microsoft would do. First off it would be cumbersome to move that thing back and forth. Secondly that thing would be way too thick and heavy, this would be more reasonable with an iPad or Macbook Pro-thickness screen. And then on top of that you still have a "refrigerator-toaster".

Perhaps the computer of the future (not tablet) would be something slanted, like 45 degrees in front of you. Imagine the virtual keyboard at the bottom. Weight is not a problem then. Looking down instead of in front might be uncomfortable though Idon't kno, but at least you wouldn't have to hang your arm in the air all the time to touch the screen.
 
I am betting there will be an update in the Fall at the latest, but I respect them for not rushing something out. They updated 2 laptop lines, the Mac pro and added a redesigned macbook pro. There is alot that can go wrong with that many releases, I think they did the right thing. It's much easier to add the latest parts to a chasis that only costs 3 bucks to make like a Dell or HP. Apple graduated to the highest level of hardware design a few years back and it will only get crazier from here. Upgrades and redesigns are a big deal for them.

no they updated two laptop lines and introduced a third that doesnt really make sense, while killing off the 17" MBP. The Mac Pro got a very tiny processor bump, no GPU bump. That does not merit an "update". At least the notebooks are running on a contemporary chipset with comtemporary ram speeds, CPUs and GPUs. They actually have the nerve to still sell a Mac Pro with DDR1066?!
I am not sure what is going on with the naming conventions at Apple. the "new" Ipad? Macbook Pro Retina?
 
New iMac's in 2013??



Since that did not happen, they can easily wait another 6 months! LOL

I am not wating 6 more months for a new computer - I have been holding onto the cash for a while and wont keep the cash in the bank - ill go out and spend 1/2 of what I saved for a MAC desktop and buy a gaming PC.

Then ill go do something else with the other half I have had waiting for a new IMAC.

And if I dont get an IMac then I wont get the new IPhone in the fall - ill go buy a droid.

Tom
 
lol - a PC with a droid phone? I'd rather use 2008 iMac and a first gen iPhone than have to deal with the awfulness of droid+Microsoft.... ick
 
Apple PR have reached out to to clarify that the 2013 redesign was specifically for the Mac Pro. You guys are getting a refresh (probably just a spec bump) this year. It's quite interesting to see the backlash against the "update" to the mac pro and the fact that Apple have actually responded.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/connieg...esigns-for-imac-mac-pro-in-works-due-in-2013/

Yeahhh, that sounds great :) , maybe we will get an update this year anyway :-D -thx for the link
 
Yeahhh, that sounds great :) , maybe we will get an update this year anyway :-D -thx for the link

The backlash after the "new" Mac Pro made Apple realise that this is something that they need to fix so they did something that's quite unusual for Apple and released info to the press that they are working on an update and this is an interim thing. However, the press took it to mean all desktops so Apple wanted to clarify that.

As I've said already in other threads. I think you'll see an Ivy Bridge spec bump and USB 3. They will want to keep all of their mainstream computers in line (USB 3, Nvidia graphics etc).

I think we'll see a more radical redesign in 2013 (maybe sooner but I doubt it).

This will include Hi-res graphics, vibrating pen patent and the folding Mac patent. This will be Apple's answer to Metro. However, now that I've said that, Metro is meant to release later this year so it would make sense for Apple to pre-empt that and create a "touch" computer that isn't really touch, but much better.

Craig Federighi (Vice President Apple OSX Software) said at last year's WWDC that dirty fingerprints on their computer monitors is not something that any one likes. He made Apple's thoughts on the matter very clear, although one must caution that Apple can and do change their mind (Steve Jobs said at AllThingsD that tablets are silly back in 2004 / 2005). A vibrating pen gives you much more precise control, especially for graphics work.

People have often touted the folding Mac patent as evidence that the Mac will go touch based. I think that's only half the picture and the picture is complete when you combine it with the vibrating pen patent.

I am not interested in trying to reach my monitor with my hand that is over 1 foot away from me and wave my dirty fingers over it causing smudges. Just try and see how ergonomic and comfortable that is, by reaching towards your screen and then pretend you're using it to do some work with your hand.

But if you fold the computer down onto the desk and use a pen, in combination with voice input (Mountain Lion), a normal keyboard and a mouse or trackpad it does make sense.

http://www.cultofmac.com/169875/what-apples-vibrating-pen-tells-us-about-the-future-of-everything/

The chances of a vibrating pen being added to your iPhone and iPad are next to zero. We already have mobile touch screens with a stylus. I had such a device back in 2005. That's why Apple went for capacitive touch screens on the iPhone and the iPad. So why would Apple patent such a device? I would guess that it's for your Mac.

From the article above:

Apple is unlikely to do what existing products with styluses do. We’re not going to see iPads and iPhones with skinny little styluses inserted into a slot for the device. We already have a wide range of third-party pens and styluses for iOS devices.

Apple isn’t the kind of company that will add a usage model (like pen input) just because other companies offer it. And they’re not the kind that will avoid using it because others have it.

Apple will offer haptic pens because they’re a great idea. Apple is leading the charge into the post-PC world. And that means touch screens. But illustrators, architects, designers, cartoonists, photo editors and others aren’t going to use their fingers for fine drawing and image manipulation. They use pens now, and they’ll use pens in the post-PC world, too.

Average users want to sign documents, doodle, hand-write notes, annotate texts and photos by circling things and scribbling in the margins.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.