rendezvouscp said:The foot is detachable for wall mountingor any other mounting that's VESA.
Chase
are you sure?
does anyone know where to the get the VESA mount that apple use in their promos?
rendezvouscp said:The foot is detachable for wall mountingor any other mounting that's VESA.
Chase
dili said:I'm a newbie here on this forum. ...Sorry about that.
But, ... only 64MB video memory and no build to order option for 128 ...
In my opinion, ...sad! ...very sad.
What's the opinion out there?
dili
coggie355 said:So does that mean that the graphic card is connected directly to the CPUs Motherboard??
nagromme said:The iMac is still MUCH bigger than a PowerBook in every dimension. More than triple the volume. Shrink that down and cooling IS a problem. Plus portables can't waste as much power on fans.
Chaszmyr said:Everyone remember... Even if this thing can be mounted on a wall.... You can't mount it flat on a wall because that wuold mean you couldn't use the ports on the back of the computer.
(Which means it is only viable to mount flat on a wall if you have airport, bluetooth, and no need for firewire access)
mashinhead said:First off what the hell is that!?
...but make no mistake about it, its the ugliest thing i've ever seeen......
iChan said:are you sure?
does anyone know where to the get the VESA mount that apple use in their promos?
macidiot said:Sooo... if the 20" iMac has the same screen as the 20" ACD(same 1680x1050 resolution), does that mean its got about $600 worth of computer???? So who is getting ripped off, the ACD buyers, the iMac buyers, or the G5 tower buyers? Looks like I got screwed w/my 20" ACD...
And again with the weak graphics. Otherwise the hardware seems pretty decent. Nice 2GB ram limit.
And if Apple broke that $600 computer out by itself, they'd sell MILLIONS. At $600 it blows the doors off of Windows boxes. Heck, I'd buy 2 immediately, one for the home theater and one for the bedroom.
I think it doesn't look that bad, but I really like the look of my ACD which is basically the same. No vertical adjustment though. Here's an idea, how about a modular computer back, that hooks onto the ACD's...add what monitor you want...or none at all.
oingoboingo said:So is this officially the end of the "Waaaaahhhh!!! You can't fit a G5 in a thin, quiet, consumer system!! Too hot!! Too noisy!!" brigade? You know who you are![]()
mrzippy said:Cool design.
Only bad thing I can see is that the 17" still appears to have the low quality TFT that the old iMac had ie. viewing angles 120 H / 90 V.
My 2nd Mac is an iMac 17", but the screen has an aweful viewing angle compared to my Sharp LCD on my powermac with 170 H / 170 V viewing angles.
120 H / 90V is very old when it comes to viewing angles on TFTs now.
zwida said:Sure doesn't look like it's VESA mount compliant to me. Comparing the back of the iMac with the back of the cinema display, it seems to lack the necessary piece to accept the adapter. This is all based on the Apple supplied images, so who knows, but you'd think they'd publicize this very cool feature if it was an option.
Mostly, I'd like it to be an option so that I can stick it on a cool articulated arm in my office.
zwida said:Sure doesn't look like it's VESA mount compliant to me. Comparing the back of the iMac with the back of the cinema display, it seems to lack the necessary piece to accept the adapter. This is all based on the Apple supplied images, so who knows, but you'd think they'd publicize this very cool feature if it was an option.
Mostly, I'd like it to be an option so that I can stick it on a cool articulated arm in my office.