Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What about a real surprise with NEW iMac's (they will keep the name) being shipped immediately with a Beta version of Leopard?

Give me a black 20 or 24" that flies and I will be really happy.
 
if true, I don't like the elevated price points. Hopefully a new mini to fill the gap?
Sure, the low end $999 price seems to be gone, but still... how can a (rumoured) drop from $1999 to $1799 be considered to be an elevation?!... :eek:
 
If Apple announced the new iMacs and then didn't make them available till the release of Leopard they could wave goodbye to making ANY revenue from the current iMacs for the next two months. Stock price plummets, they lose a LOT of cash. Stupid, and never going to happen. The only reason they did it for the iPhone was because they had to register the phone with the FCC and it would have leaked so they made the announcement. Also, they weren't going to kill exisiting sales because the device didn't already exist...

Anyway, a chum on another forum has posted this:



Who knows? Maybe time to stop speculating and wait, eh? But if the new iMacs have 1GB of RAM I'll be VERY p'd off.

at least gives me some hope that the Mac Mini will continue
 
A combo drive in ANY modern computer is simply insane.

It is not done for a cost reason. It is to try and get you buy the next model up.
Integrated graphics would also be ridiculous.

False. Outdated graphics would be ridiculous. Integrated just mean it is printed on the same board. Apple used to integrate RAM. The future is to integrate graphic processing onto the same silicon as the CPU.
 
I'm thinking this could well be right. If the rumours about Intel bringing Penryn forward are right, then the dates would line up well.

Then again, Steve did say that the iPhone pre-announcement was not the new normal process for Apple product releases..... so an iMac pre-announcement would go against this.

Not a chance, that would be commercial suicide. They'd not sell a single iMac for the next 1-2 months until the release. I don't think a major company is that stupid.
 
To add to these fine comments:

Aren't you also assuming someone wants to spend that and that they want OS X? Something the Mac defenders like to assume because that is what THEY want.

Spec for spec comparison are dandy and useful. But what incentive does one have to buy a Mac when they are more? Who cares if it is VGA, integrated graphics, etc, if the person doesn't care/know about it?....

And I'll add "can't justify or perhaps afford it".

Some models of Hondas and Toyotas are basically the same as their much higher priced Acura and Lexus cousins. Some people don't want or need the heated power butt-washers or whatever - so the Hondas and Toyotas sell.



Memory Installed 3 GB
Maximum allowed 8 GB (4 x 2 GB) (64-bit OS)

Ummm, we are talking about an entry system here, and comparing it with an iMac that has *never* supported more memory than the $879 HP comes with as standard.

Also, the important thing about the memory is that the minitower and motherboard support 4 DDR2 DIMM slots. While this allows for a max of 8 GiB using 2 GiB DIMMs, the more important thing for the entry is that cheaper smaller DIMMs can be used.

The 3 GiB is 2x1GiB + 2x512MiB - which can easily be found for $120 online and probably far less at the volumes that HP buys. A single 2 GiB DIMM is about $100 online - quite a bit more than the price for two 1 GiB DIMMs.

(64-bit OS) note the HP doesnt come with Vista or XP 64-bit..Add on $400 for that if you want to have 8 GB of RAM..

Once again, you leave out the facts.

Vista Home Premium 64-bit - $114.99

And you'll qualify for the OEM price if you buy the x64 kit along with the $400 to $500 that the 8 GiB will cost you.

But anyway, the 64-bit issue is moot - my sister won't need even 2 GiB....


NO Wireless...Need to buy a 802.11n card---Add $59...

Nope, don't need wireless. Office is wired, and wireless sucks for performance compared to a Cat5 cable.


Integrated graphics SUCKS need to buy a comperable video card--Add $249..

Let's see, you think that the 128 MiB X1600 chip in the iMac is comparable to a GeForce 8600GTS 256MiB GDDR3 PCI Express x16 HDCP Video Card - since that one can be purchased for $240? Or perhaps a Radeon X1950XT 256MiB GDDR3 AGP 8X HDCP Video Card for $260?

And, integrated graphics are pretty good for most tasks and most people - and the HP has the newest GMA3100.... It's DX9c and has video decode offload engines.

I think that you're dreaming up stuff to jack up the price of the HP....


The 19" monitor is cheap compared to the 20" and 24" in the iMac. so you'd have to buy a decent 20" or 24"/23" LCD--Add $349[/url]

And the great thing is that I *can* buy a different monitor!

Anyway, you haven't even seen the HP, so perhaps you don't know that it's pretty good, and it's a big jump up from what my sister has now.


Add $400 for 64-bit Vista

Still harping on that?
__________________________________________

Actually, though, I have upgraded the system a little.

  • $113 - 512 MiB GDDR2 nVidia GeForce 8500 GT x16 PCIe graphics (VGA+DVI+TVout) - silent Asus EN8500GT - no fan
  • $210 - 750 GB Seagate Barracuda for 2nd internal drive slot (1.15 TB total disk) -- for $200 added to the iMac, you'd get a total of 500GB :mad:
  • $104 - AverTV PCIe NTSC/ATSC/QAM TV/cable/digitalcable tuner w/ MCE remote - http://www.aver.com/mpd/combopcie_mce.html

So my $1050 HP is now a full Media Center for $1477 - still less than the iMac.
 
Apple is not going to ship a mac with a beta version of it's software, this would go against the mac design mentality completely. This is not Windows world here.

What about a real surprise with NEW iMac's (they will keep the name) being shipped immediately with a Beta version of Leopard?

Give me a black 20 or 24" that flies and I will be really happy.
 
Not a chance, that would be commercial suicide. They'd not sell a single iMac for the next 1-2 months until the release. I don't think a major company is that stupid.

New enough not to remember the iMac G4->G5 transition? At least 2 months no iMacs available AT ALL! Apple had no back-up plan, just stopped making the G4, and announced 'G5 aint ready, oops, instead of a price drop, or a RAM boost or even a colour change or just ANYthing, we'll just sell nothing till it's ready' (Supply issues, hence the eventual intel thing.)


So: "I don't think a major company is that stupid"... It has been before...
Only 4 hours to go till the Flower Power & Blue Dalmation 24" iMac Core 2 Duo! ;)
 
New enough not to remember the iMac G4->G5 transition? At least 2 months no iMacs available AT ALL! Apple had no back-up plan, just stopped making the G4, and announced 'G5 aint ready, oops, instead of a price drop, or a RAM boost or even a colour change or just ANYthing, we'll just sell nothing till it's ready' (Supply issues, hence the eventual intel thing.)


So: "I don't think a major company is that stupid"... It has been before...
Only 4 hours to go till the Flower Power & Blue Dalmation 24" iMac Core 2 Duo! ;)

All the more reason not to do it this time around.
 
Any chance of new cinema display ? Something like a Led cinema display 20 inches for 299 ? Would be great no ?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.