riddle me this, Macrumors legions - if PB delays have been blamed on shortages of the blazingly fast (cough) 1.25GHz G4, why would Apple choose to stock them in iMacs when the PB line represented a more critical need? Am I missing something about the die size or something here?
I think this points to a G5 PB to be announced at Paris.
As underwhelming as this update is to the iMac line, I can't belive Jobs & Co. would delay an announcement on PB updates of the same underwhelming nature.
I paint two scenarios here for you:
A) After an underwhelming response to the iMac updates, Steve Jobs shows up at Paris announcing before the crowd, "Behold, I give you the .25GHz increase in speed PowerBook - another example of Apple innovation". A small smattering of Applause from the Ultra-Orthodox Macolyte representatives, then some invectives hurled out in French (for example, please refer to Matrix: Reloaded) followed quickly by stale baguettes and strange French sandwich fixings. Steve ducks and dodges and runs for the side, but ends up with pate in his eye, cursing Motorola under his breath.
B) After an underwhelming response to the iMac updates, Steve Jobs shows up at Paris wearing a smug grin, announcing before the crowd, "Behold, I give you the G5 PowerBook. The world's first practical 64 bit laptop - another example of Apple innovation," to the shock and awe of everyone there. Parisian girls start kissing American GIs on the streets, Americans start eating French Fries again. Orders for G5 PBs skyrocket although delivery dates remain 3 months away (and then a 4th month - something about a small university wanting to create a portable super-cluster). Behind the podium, where nobody can see, Steve gives Motorola the finger.
Now vote! Which do you think is more likely?