i don't mean crts i mean a cheap mac for education or people who want an all in one thats cheaper than the currant imacs
The other downside is that viewing angles are less forgiving.
It's an incremental step forward, and it's a decent-looking machine the way a bunch of the newer PeeCees are decent-looking. It's just not iconic or revolutionary, and that would have been nice.
Yes it will.I've been reading macrumors.com almost every day for the past 3 weeks, because of the new iMac release. Until then I've been using a friends Mac Mini next to my Vista PC. Now the iMacs are finally here, I am a bit (a lot actually) worried: will I be able to use one of my Samsung 226BW TFT screens as an extra display for my (hopefully) future iMac? I'm a near-complete Apple noob, so please someone help me out? : )
I believe that the new iMac supports a new type of mirroring too...just place the iMac close to any bright light source and stare at the (NEWSUPERDUPERYETCOMPLETELYPOINTLESS) glossy screen.The iMac supports spanning (where your desktop becomes twice as wide across the two displays) and mirroring (where the information on the iMac's screen is mirrored on the external display.)
Notice the white keys on the keyboard do not really match the dark design of the rest of the iMac - even the Apple has turned black. I think it would work better to have black keys. Of course then the Mighty Mouse would need to go black as well.![]()
Just go try it out. Seriously. Standing in front of both models extensively, anywhere there is a reflection on a glossy panel, there's also a reflection on the matte one (using the MBP as a reference). Neither one affects use when you're sitting at the computer.
Because of transmissive backlighting, the computer itself is brighter than all but the most intense and focused light sources that might be aimed at the display. A matte display will wash out in intense light and diffuse the spot across a larger area. A glossy display will show a reflection.
People condemn the displays based on a walk-by from five feet away instead of sitting right at one, adjusting it properly, and trying to use it. The 10-second jab is always easier. When the glossy panels first came to Macs, there was doom and gloom left and right. Then people actually used them and found their fears baseless. It bears absolutely no relation to the anti-glare screens for CRTs--the physics and optics are completely different, and people seem to have forgotten that the anti-glare screens were themselves glossy from oblique angles, too.
Um yes, they absolutely are. Fingerprints on a glossy screen are easy enough to remove, but good luck taking fingerprints off of a matte screen. You need special cleaner, and even with said cleaner, you'll likely still see the prints. They're absolutely a nightmare when the screen is off.Um, no, actually, they aren't. Fingerprints are clearly more visible on glossy surfaces. I have to look carefully to spot fingerprints and smudges on my 19" Samsung matte monitor. Fingerprints on glossy screens are readily visible from a good distance.
I don't think so. If you've ever - ever used a Macbook with a glossy screen, you'd know that the gloss is rarely a glare issue. Haven't you read any of the reviews from Macbook owners with glossy screens? They (almost) all say the same thing. It isn't an issue unless you happen to be sitting in the "sweet spot" for glare. In which case, a slight re-adjustment fixes the problem. In terms of color rendition, again, it's personal preference. Some people argue that because the individual pixels are less viewable, it's more difficult to calibrate/use professionally. Others say the gloss improves perceived color saturation and contrast ratio (which is true, if you're looking at a matte and gloss screen side by side, the gloss will "pop" more).Maybe if you live in your parents' unlit basement it would be OK, but a large monitor like the one on a 24" iMac can generate enough illumination of its own to make reflections and glare an issue even in a dark room. The glossy screen also screws up color rendition, and as I think I already mentioned the gray levels on this monitor were pretty crummy. Shockingly so.
It's only a rats nest if you make it one. One cable going to a subwoofer, and one cable going to each of the individual speakers. I have mine in the corner of my ceiling, with tape & paint perfectly hiding the wiring. On my office desk, the wires are tucked behind the desk. One cable tie keeps everything neat and tidy. If you use the internal speakers on your computer and expect them to be any more than even quasi decent, you're a complete idiot. It would be like using your TV speakers in a home theatre. Next.Um, people who don't want their desktop and workspace cluttered up with speakers, cables, volume controls, power supplies and other junk. If I wanted that rat's nest of mismatched cables, I'd save $500 - $700 and just buy a desktop PC from Dell or HP.
The video card is definitely a downgrade. Everything else is an upgrade. More RAM, Bigger hard drives. Faster processors. Better software. Your opinion about what is and what's not "visually appealing" doesn't merit a specific generation of computer a "downgrade".No, I'm just not impressed by an already-outdated hardware "upgrade" and a visually unappealing (and in many cases impractical) design. In many if not most respects, the "new" iMac feels like a downgrade from the existing model, not an upgrade. The graphics card actually is a downgrade from what I can determine, and they've taken away the ability to replace it, the way you could in the existing 24" iMac.
They should have AT LEAST put a 2900 XT in there and then put a 8800GTX/Ultra or new Nvidia part (Fall part) in the update for the Mac Pro. This will keep the Mac Pro ahead of the iMac, since the 8800GTX beats out the 2900.
Need not worry, you can, there is a mini DVI port at the very end. The MacBook provides the same mini DVI port as well. You just have to have a converter to regular DVI unless your display has a mini DVI connector at the end (I wasn't sure if displays actually have those or not).