Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What's the reason for the large images being scaled down? iOS bug?

EDIT: For those who say it is for memory, cellular reasons or speed of the web browser, the iPad 3 is meant for high resolution images. If there's one available, and you are on WiFi, then why restrain it. It does have 1GB of memory..

This makes sense on other iOS devices, but the iPad 3's selling point is the retina display. Seems daft to downscale images below the 3 megapixel screen the iPad 3 has when a WiFi connection is available along with enough memory.

I personally do think it's a performance concern. When I view high MP images in my photo album, it can take unto 5 seconds for the image to clear up, despite the iPad being "made for it" Yes, the iPad is a powerful device as far as tablets go, but it's still a long ways away from being as powerful as a modern day desktop or laptop.
 
Has anyone ever noticed the same thing while receiving a picture through Messages? You don't get the highest resolution from viewing it within the Messages app, until you save it to your photos. Same concept?
 
Mmm, I don't like that. I hope Apple fixes it... it's definitely not a RAM issue.

Even a 2048x2048 (retina wallpaper size) image will only take up 16MBs of RAM.
 
Has anyone ever noticed the same thing while receiving a picture through Messages? You don't get the highest resolution from viewing it within the Messages app, until you save it to your photos. Same concept?
Not even close. For starters it does not send the full sized image or video if you send from within an iMessage conversation: it sends a reduced size version. It does not save the high res image when you save it as it never received it in the first place.

With iMessage the issue is speed of receiving the message as well as bandwidth. You would not want to be waiting forever when someone is sending a quick pic during the conversation. Moreover, it behaves differently on WiFi than 3G/4G. This is what happens with, for example, a sample iPhone 4S pic and vid sent during an iMessage chat:

Original photo: 2448x3264 (1.7MB)
WiFi: 1440x1920 (.6MB)
3G: 960x1280 (.42MB)


Original video: 1080x1920 (48.6MB)
WiFi: 540x960 (2.6MB)
3G: 180x320 (.89MB)


Now if you send a pic or vid from outside iMessage then it is not treated the same way. In that case apparently the presumption is that you are not in the middle of a conversation so it is sent at full resolution--at least for photos. So if you took a picture and then sent to via iMessage to someone from the camera roll they get the full-resolution picture (or whatever would be sent via email--it almost treats sending that way like email).

I read someplace, perhaps on the dev center at Apple, that iMessage won't send a video or picture greater than 1GB when on 3G.



Michael
 
The Safari scaling issue is infuriating when looking for wallpapers. You simply can't look for them in your iPad because they're compressed to hell and scaled down to 1024x1024, you have to look for them on a computer, then transfer them to your iPad. I hope they fix this.

Not correct. I've downloaded wallpaper in safari and they are 2048*2048 as confirmed by iPhoto. Yet you have to open a new tap for original img though.

As for web pages, I do hope safari can solve the issue, although currently it does more scale up than scale down in daily uses.
 
The way it continues to charge after reaching 100% is normal for any brandnew device based on Li-Ion or Li-Po cells. The charge controller needs to get its bearings on exactly how much capacity it can stuff into each cell and the cell capacity tends to increase it bit over the first few cycles anyway.

A few notes.

A Lithium Ion/Polymer is full when a certain Voltage reaches a certain threshold(about 4.2 Volt), not a capacity as many people think.
You can not overcharge (Voltage) a Lithium Ion/Polymer, it will break, so anything over 100% is bad.(Explosion)
Nor can you discharge under a certain Voltage threshold, again it will break.
Charging is Temperature controlled, if it wasn't there's a big chance it may break/explode.

There's a reason why it's not that easy to buy Non-pack Li-Ion cells because of these potential dangers.

Edit : A good link to charging Lithium Ion

http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/charging_lithium_ion_batteries

It's constantly counting how much energy goes in and out and after a few cycles I would expect it to be much more accurate.

You are wrong, it constantly checks the voltage in the cell and will only calculate the Battery meter according to this.
To calculate a batteries Capacity you have to completely charge the Battery, then discharge completely and only then you know the capacity.
 
Last edited:
Battery

My original iPad used to say the battery was fully charged at levels as low as 92%. It was running iOS 5. I think the percentage meter it more of an estimate at the battery life.
 
Why should they? iOS shouldn't be doing it, period. If developers start adding this, they also need to add hundreds of other proprietary tags too.

---

As for the battery, the issue is USB. We're using a 5v crummy old usb cable to charge a laptop battery here. Apple should have supplied a new power connector as theres no way that they didnt know that charging was going to be significantly slower.

I plugged my iPad in yesterday and noted its charge at 20%. Exactly 6 hours later, it was at 60%. Thats not right.

My guess is that it is to make pages load faster and use less 4G bandwidth.
 
My guess is that it is to make pages load faster and use less 4G bandwidth.

The mobile networks compress images anyway. You dont need images being compressed when you're on Wifi, so there is no need for it to even exist in Safari.
 
The mobile networks compress images anyway. You dont need images being compressed when you're on Wifi, so there is no need for it to even exist in Safari.

only if they have a special mobile-version of the site
 
It turns out the iPad continues to charge for as long as an hour after it says its at 100%, suggesting the on-screen indicator isn't quite accurate and may still need more charging.iLounge found in their battery testing of the new iPad that sometimes the charge would drop initially quickly when they thought the iPad was fully charged.

Duh? How to charge a LIPO battery:

The basic process is to charge at constant current until each cell reaches 4.2 V; the charger must then gradually reduce the charge current while holding the cell voltage at 4.2 V until the charge current has dropped to a small percentage of the initial charge rate, at which point the battery is considered 100% charged. Some manufacturers specify 2%, others 3%, but other values are also possible. The difference in achieved capacity is minute.

What Apple are doing makes perfect sense. Once the charge current has dropped significantly, the amount of energy still being transferred to the battery is negligible. It makes no sense to tell (by displaying < 100 %) the user to wait another hour for such diminishing returns.
 
A consumer has the right to trust that when a device says 100% charged that it no longer draws additional electricity = cost behind the consumers back and without a consumers agreement.

Almost every PC laptop I've ever used NEVER stops charging. That's why the batteries wear out so quickly. At least Apple is smart enough to stop charging the battery when it's full.

The calculation of battery life is not an exact science. Sometimes my MacBook Pro battery peaks at 100%, sometimes it peaks at 96%.

Besides, just because the battery isn't charging doesn't mean that your computer is not using electricity. It's still drawing power from the AC outlet. And you're talking about pennies in any case.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.