Apart from the pure joy of seeing Speedtest numbers that high, what practical purpose would that much bandwidth be needed on an iPad Pro?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
New iPad Pro Includes Special Mode to Turn Off Wi-Fi 6E
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
the client controls which frequency to use, how is the router going to solve this?
I don’t think it will require a network. I think it will connect directly, like the AppleTV can and how airdrop works.
You need to get a better router. That is called band steering and your current router is not doing it properly. A good router will perform infinitely better. Higher end routers also allow you to customize this behaviour, allowing you to prioritize the 5 GHz bands more. Unfortunately, one can’t just get an expensive router and be done with it. Lots of expensive routers perform band steering poorly too. You will have to do lots of research and get one that has been extensively tested with this feature via reviews etc. The Netgear R7000p is one such router, but I wouldn’t recommend it now, as it is older and only supports wifi 5.
That’s just categorically false. Not just in practice but even in theory. It’s not even as fast as USB 3, let alone thunderbolt.
because wifi 6e achieves the same speeds as wifi 6. wifi 6e operates in the range of 6 ghz is very susceptible to speed drops caused by distance from the router and obstacles
I finally upgraded my 10 year old router to a couple Eero 6 (not 6e and not Pro) mesh routers. It'll probably be another decade before I upgrade again!
There are few things less interesting than a router.
wifi 6e and wifi 6 can achieve the same speeds. 4800 Mbps maximum if 4x4 antennas are used
Not at all. That way of needing to manipulate the controls to get Wifi 6e working is: a) overly complicated, and b) not a good user experience, and therefore c) not in line with what we think has been Apple's computing and design philosophy. Very clunky.
Got the 12.9” today. Connects without issues to my eero 6E mesh network on the 6GHz channel. Speeds are about 30% greater than my 5GHz devices get, as there is no other traffic on the 6GHz channel right now.
I have a 6e network. It primarily puts almost all of my items into the 5GHz network. Only a few of my items that are far from the main router end up on the 2.4GHz network. The 6GHz network never seems to get used, which I find odd, though I only have one device that uses 6GHz, so perhaps that's not so unusual. The one item I have is the Samsung Galaxy Fold 4.
Of my 50+ devices on my network, about 3 of them end up on the 2.4GHz network. The rest go on 5GHz.
So that the software on the connecting device can auto switch to the best network more easily / seamlessly.
Using different SSIDs is only useful in order to isolate clients to a specific Band rather than allowing them to jump between 2.4, 5 and 6 ghz.
I would recommend keeping Wi-Fi 6e capable devices on their own SSID temporarily as more often than not they will jump over to the strongest band which will often not be 6 ghz. Also it’s a bit easier to test and validate your client is connected to 6ghz while it is still an emerging standard and gaining more presence in the market.
That happens with separate networks, too. Typically, to avoid these problems, you get a mesh network. With mesh networks, they seamlessly roam from 2.4GHz to 5GHz networks and so on. Now if you have your threshold set wrong and a device holds onto a far access point too tightly, then it won't roam properly. So fine-tuning of any system may be required.
It isn't really inherent for a single SSID to cause problems, though, if you have your network set up and configured properly. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind that a single SSID is better than separate SSID's. I've used both and have had more problems in my case with separate SSID's, especially with IoT devices that can't communicate. I especially had problems with my Sonos sound bar that was only fixed by unifying the network. Some devices that can only support 2.4Ghz, like the Sonos or our Gardyn (networked planter) or my Meross mood light, couldn't talk with my 5GHz devices when the SSID"s were different, so it was a royal pain to connect with my iPhone. Putting them on the same SSID fixed that issue. At one point, I had to return some of my HomeKit items that only worked on 2.4GHz in favor of ones that also supported 5GHz.
Basically it differs depending on the network. Some find it easier one way, some find it easier another way. For me, a unified network solved a ton of problems. If separate networks work for you better, that's great.
If you'd truly followed that adage, you'd still be on a 2.4 only network and wouldn't face this situation at all.
It works great. With my RBR960, all bands under one SSID, M2 iPad picks up the 6ghz band with the speeds that go with it. A separate 6ghz band would give you “Limited Capability“
I have a 1gb fiber connection and just got the 2022 iPad Pro and the 6E speeds am getting are 941/840. I got the Orbi RBR 960 mesh system
Why would that be? Other phones have had WIFI6E since beginning of 2021. 6E channel frequency start where 6 ends. Clear channels and no interference means clients can finish transmitting faster then go back to low power sleep.
As others have said, this is dependent on your router and client, but modern devices should be capable of band steering properly.
What you need is an access point (AP) which supports 802.11r and 802.11v. Eero release notes mention added (or perhaps improved) support for these standards in their October 8, 2021 software update. Here's some info on Apple device support for the standards and what they do:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202628
With the appropriate standard (i.e. 802.11v and 802.11r) the AP can intelligently "suggest" when a client would be better off roaming onto another AP or frequency. It's up to the client to accept the suggestion, but most will.
Theoretical max performance isn't at all the same as real-world max performance. Plus, when high-bandwidth devices move from 5Ghz to 6Ghz, that frees up bandwidth for other devices to use on 5 Ghz. 6E will be a big step forward for WiFi over time as 6E devices proliferate.
Can you cite a source? As I am not aware of any way to enable WPA2 on a network with 6Ghz and they require that this restriction applies across the entire SSID. So you can't have WPA2 on 5Ghz and WPA3 on 6Ghz on a network with the same SSID.
Wireless Security in a 6 GHz Wi-Fi 6E World
www.extremenetworks.com
6E is pretty useless. Most people don’t use these expensive routers and 7 is just around the corner. Personally I would prefer that Apple skip 6E and introduce 7 ASAP… 🧌
Last edited:
I’m confused here: Apple recommends using a single network name across the router's 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz bands. However wifi 6E requires WPA3 only in order to operate the 6ghz and does not support mixed mode. Many devices older than a few years will not be able to connect to the network because They don’t necessarily support wpa3. The solution would be to broadcast separate SSID for a network that is on wpa2/3 mixed mode. Smart tvs for one is a good example that don’t usually support the wpa3.