I assume via different WiFi access points? As a WiFi 6E device can’t be certified in that configuration.Source: My home network.
You most definitely can. On one network I have a Nest thermostat connected on 2.4Ghz via WPA2, my iPad Air connected on 5Ghz via WPA3, and there is an available 6Ghz network (I do not have any 6E devices yet) all under the same ESSID. In fact, my Guest network does the same.
I agree to a degree. But I didn't say the 5G band is empty, I said that some radio environments have an extremely congested 2.4 Ghz band. And high bandwidth applications such as 4K video or IP video/phone calls may suffer severely on the 2.4 GHz band. Your radio environment is different from mine, but I suggest if you haven't already to use Wifi Explorer to scan your wifi radio environment to get a visual depiction of the SSIDs around you. The results can be illuminating. In the example I gave, there were 30+ SSIDs in the 2.4 GHz spectrum and only about 10 in the 5G spectrum.Also, this idea that the 2.4 GHz band is so congested while the 5GHz band is empty is very antiquated. Pretty much every router sold for nearly a decade now supports 5GHz, including the really crappy ones that come free from ISPs. So in apartments and other crowded areas, the 5GHz band is incredibly crowded too. That’s part of the appeal of 6E and the 6 GHz band to many people.
Roaming is a client decision. The router can help facilitate roaming when there is a mesh network (e.g., by disconnecting a client when RSSI drops below a certain dBm threshold and steering it to a different node) but if there is no mesh, it is the client decision to roam or not. And many clients roam to the 2.4 GHz band and stay there. It is not the fault of the router. Asus routers have a smart connect feature that is supposed to use one SSID for all bands and help facilitate roaming and migrating clients to the 'best' band. But if you look at forums online, you will see that many people have had a bad experience with this feature and have turned it off.That is not a problem really of SSIDs though. That is just a crappy quality router. And you cannot just spend a lot and expect to get a good quality router in return either. You really have to do a lot of research and look at good reviews about the model you are considering. If you had a better router, those high throughput devices (at least if they are 4 years old or less) would stay on the 5GHz band properly
I clearly said "in my experience." It's not about scaring, it's about sharing. It's not about my idea being best or yours being best. There's room my position and for yours. Some people may have terrible network experience, and blame their ISP, when the problem is not the ISP's wire into the house, but rather with having one SSID and most of the wifi clients (including the ones that need high bandwidth) hanging out on the 2.4 GHz band. This is exactly what happened to my wife. If you only use one SSID, have you ever even checked your router to see which band the clients are on? Have you ever tried to optimize your network by splitting it up into chunks, 2.4 Ghz for some clients, and 5 GHz for others? Having separate SSIDs and manually planning the network solved all of my wife's laggy latency network problems.But to just blanket claim that all people should split their SSIDs, and scaring them into thinking that all their devices will be stuck on 2.4 GHz “ad infinitum” is not really great advice, IMHO. I am glad that has worked for you. But it is far from universal advice.
Really disappointed is all. They were better off not releasing anything rather than screwing and devaluing everyone's m1 by releasing a pointless productThey are made from the exact same material. If you have buyer's remorse and want to return it, return it. No need to try and justify it.
I strongly suggest to not plan your network around 1 apple device. You have to think about how the other devices on your network will behave once you have one SSID. Most of them will roam to the 2.4 GHz channel and stay there ad infinitum, and you will lose the ability to steer them to the channel you want them on (5G).
If you live in a building with many neighbors, the 2.4 GHz band will suffer from interference. During the pandemic when everyone was working from home simultaneously , my now wife was using a router with just one SSID and her Roku/Apple TV would roam and stay on the 2.4 GHz band and she would sometimes have severe trouble with watching videos. The video would stutter or not load. Also, Sometimes her zoom calls would drop. Whenever she got on a zoom call she would switch off Wi-Fi and use LTE on her phone. She thought it was a network provider issue.
I told her before you call them, let me check it out. When I investigated the situation, I found that she had only one SSID, I looked at nearby SSIDs using Wi-Fi explorer and found there were 30+ networks competing for space in the 2.4 GHz band. It was crowded! As soon as I set separate SSIDs for 2.4Ghz and 5G, let the low bandwidth clients use 2.4 GHz and let the higher bandwidth clients use 5G, all the problems with video and zoom went away.
Real world experience contradicts the theory behind clients choosing the ‘best’ band. They seem to prioritize RSSI strength and not channel bandwidth or throughout. If one SSID is working well for you then use that. But for some of us, manual control is still necessary.
So I have the nighthawk try-band router and had separate names for 2.4, 5 and 6ghz bands. For some reason my M2 iPad was not seeing the 6ghz band, so I renamed the 2.4 ghz band and the 6ghz band to the same name. Now the iPad will connect to 6ghz (I can tell because of the speed) and I also saw the setting in the screenshot below in the wifi settings on that ssid. So apparently, the iPad is connecting to 6ghz automatically when available.
What’s a use case that requires wifi and the bandwidth that comes with 6e? I have 3x eero (wifi 5) with a wired backhaul and I get between 200-500 mbit anywhere in my house. Wired clients max out at 940mbit. I can’t see the need for wifi 6 or 6e.
I really did like Airport routers but now that I've been forced to look elsewhere I won't go back.They wouldn't have to explain anything if they'd still make AirPort routers. I'll be the first to buy if they'd ever start making routers again.
Agree to disagree on the one vs multiple SSIDs position, and move on. Best wishes!This isn't planning for one Apple device - it's planning for every device and my advice holds true.
One SSID has worked perfectly for me and everyone I know for well over a decade now. Cheap 2.4ghz wifi sockets have no problem connecting to the 2.4ghz bit.
It helps if you're using decent AP's as well - i'm using only UniFi stuff for a very few number of clients (compared to their enterprise design) and all have their own channels that don't overlap.
The only device in the entire system which has issues is the Apple Watch and making separate networks for that isn't going to help.
6E is also designed to be a top player to 5ghz, not it's own SSID - hence Apple's recommendation. With a decent AP you can set minimum RSSI for each band, you can enable band steering and more - all this needs to be under one SSID or "Most of them will roam to the 2.4 GHz channel and stay there ad infinitum" (ironically as you said) WILL happen with seperate SSID's as a device will only move SSID if it loses signal even if the 5ghz is now over powering the 2.4ghz, if it sees the 2.4ghz first as it approaches your house and signal stays strong it'll never change to the better network - and it's best not to make phones use one or the other spectrum, they're design to use both and in the future they'll be designed to use all 3 and pick which gives the best signal strength/speed in the area it's in.
It's also best to hard wire everything you can anyway - and not use the routers that come free with the ISP unless you're a very casual user.
No, not really, not if your 5 and 2.4GHz have the same SSID. iOS and MacOS take into consideration the predicted/estimated datarate, which is a product of RSSI + noise + channel bandwidth + protocol level. 5GHz tends to have lower RSSI, but also lower noise, wider channel bandwidth and more recent WiFI versions.Exactly, 2.4 Ghz always has the strongest RSSI so most devices choose to roam to the 2.4 Ghz band and stay there.
So what are you using nowadays? Apple only offers Linksys in their store. I’m most concerned with privacy these days, so I wonder if they keep other brands out because of their privacy policies.I really did like Airport routers but now that I've been forced to look elsewhere I won't go back.
Same with the Cinema Display. They took so long to update it I can't be bothered with their offering now.
Damn Nice upload, you free tonight?
https://amplifi.com/alien This is the extreme we always wanted!!!!So what are you using nowadays? Apple only offers Linksys in their store. I’m most concerned with privacy these days, so I wonder if they keep other brands out because of their privacy policies.
I use the Asus GT-AXE11000. The config web page shows what band is being used by my devices and the vast majority go on the 5GHz band with a unified SSID. I've seen my devices roam, occasionally going on the 2.4GHz band and then later migrating back to 5GHz, which is where they tend to stay.Which router setup are you using?
Oh gosh, a Kuo rumor. So it'll be right about 1% of the time. Throw enough claims out there and some are bound to come true.Wifi 6E does more than have fast internet speeds. It’s essentially a wireless connection with close to Thunderbolt speeds. The original rumors from Kuo said the headset will feature wifi 6E pairing to a more powerful processor as well.
I have an iPhone 13 (iOS 16.1) and a 16" MBP from 2020 and both connect to my 5GHz signal through several walls and a floor. WiFi is very location specific.I can't use a single SSID with Apple products cuz they default to 2.4ghz slowskee! Why is my video lagging.. OH, I'm on the slowest freaking protocol. WHY? I have 5ghz and 6ghz, so why are Apple products constantly on the wrong band? ATV use 2.4, why? It lags and can't stream on 35mb. Go to my iPad 11inch 2nd gen and blam also on slow band. Same with MacBooks. So to fix this I have to split my SSIDs up and put the Apple devices on the correct band they should be using. I call this wrong band lock. Once the device goes to the slow band it never lets go. If the slow band lock issue with Apple is not fixed I don't see this 6ghz "feature" being worth a 💩!
Don't say it is my settings I have AMplifi Alien and I don't fux with the settings it's out of box and Apple products function this way. I was AirPort Extreme purist as well and still same issue with the Extremes. Apple OS' have a "gets stuck on lower band" problem.
Of course it is - but if you're going to refuse to use a single SSID like you should, you should at least put the 5hhz and 6ghz bands on the same SSID and not the 2.4ghz and 6ghz together!
It absolutely can. This is all on every AP I have.I assume via different WiFi access points? As a WiFi 6E device can’t be certified in that configuration.
Obviously, the WiFi 6E restrictions can’t be enforced if your SSID split across different devices…
That’s awesome! Would you mind turning off 6E and testing it on 5GHz for comparison? Does your router provide a way of verifying whether the iPad is using 160 MHz channels? Or alternatively would you mind running the Apple wifi performance diagnostics utility and posting the results? Many thanks!
What access points do you have?It absolutely can. This is all on every AP I have.