I choose black numbers for the clock so I can get rid of that tooi use black color as wallpaper on lock screen so basically the only thing it shows is clock
I choose black numbers for the clock so I can get rid of that tooi use black color as wallpaper on lock screen so basically the only thing it shows is clock
This is meant to be a very mobile device. Brightness when used outside really matters.I don't need more nits. I need more focus on eye comfort. Tell me you're Eyesafe maybe I'll start to get excited.
So you have your iPad set to always display a big black clock?i use black color as wallpaper on lock screen so basically the only thing it shows is clock
If I didn't have a watch with AOD I think i'd like it on a phone. There's a problem with that however where in modern times its considered polite to put your phone face down as a sign your not watching it/are engaged with somebody else. Going back to college some professors also either require you to hide your phone or have it face down rendering the feature worthless.I'm not a fan of the Alway-On display because it slowly drains the battery anyway. 😒
I have one iPad hung on the wall as a general Home control center and for calendar/reminders/notes. An always-on mode that doesn’t burn in the screen would be useful for that.I’m not sure what the usefulness of an Always-On iPad display would be. Can someone educate me?
On an iPad 13' I could actually see the feature making sense. Could Display weather/text/time/appointments etc. As the devices get smaller it does seem to make less sense besides the watch showing time.I’m not sure what the usefulness of an Always-On iPad display would be. Can someone educate me?
On a watch its great, you should always be able to see the time. Period. Fixed a major error. On a phone.... I don't see the point.Always On will not be missed for me.
I was hoping you could dock it and it would go to a low refresh rate and could act as your bedside clock alarm like the iPhone and when you wake schedule smart home hub etc etcI’m not sure what the usefulness of an Always-On iPad display would be. Can someone educate me?
I was really looking forward to seeing a new iPad mini.
The new 11-inch and 13-inch iPad Pro models are equipped with OLED displays that support a refresh rate as low as 10Hz, but the devices still lack an always-on display option like the iPhone and Apple Watch have, according to Apple's tech specs.
![]()
While the iPad Pro has supported ProMotion since 2017, the device only supported refresh rates between 24Hz and 120Hz until now. The new iPad Pro models use low-power LTPO technology, according to display industry expert Ross Young, allowing the display to ramp down to 10Hz for static content. This change will contribute to lower power consumption, but advertised battery life is unchanged overall compared to the previous iPad Pro generation.
The same situation happened a few years ago with the iPhone 13 Pro models, which also support ProMotion down to 10Hz, but lack an always-on display option. The feature finally arrived on the iPhone with the iPhone 14 Pro models, which can ramp down to 1Hz, and Apple Watch models with an always-on display also reach 1Hz.
All in all, the iPad Pro is unlikely to get an always-on display option until if and when it too supports a 1Hz refresh rate.
Apple says the iPad Pro now features "state-of-the-art tandem OLED technology that uses two OLED panels and combines the light from both to provide phenomenal full-screen brightness." The new iPad Pro models can achieve up to 1,000 nits of full-screen brightness for SDR content, compared to 600 nits for the previous-generation models.
The new iPad Pro models are available to order starting today and launch on Wednesday, May 15.
Article Link: New iPad Pros Support Lower Refresh Rate, But Lack Always-On Display
It's good of you to question Apple's decisions. Another *gate coming. Yippee. More anti apple stuff to post about.Anyone else thinking what I am. Have we got another "Bendgate" scandal on its way. That is so thin for its size. How can it have good structural strength ?
It wouldn't have made sense with an LCD, because an LCD doesn't save power when displaying a mostly black image.Why was article written? I have NEVER heard anyone ask for an always on display on an iPad. And the article ends by saying it will likely never happen. Much like this article that should never have happened. Is someone getting paid by the article or the word now?
I'm curious what the situation with PWM will be. Most small OLED devices use PWM, but OLED TVs don't.I don't need more nits. I need more focus on eye comfort. Tell me you're Eyesafe maybe I'll start to get excited.
This would be great. But, Burn-in…I have one iPad hung on the wall as a general Home control center and for calendar/reminders/notes. An always-on mode that doesn’t burn in the screen would be useful for that.
Calendar updates, text message and alert updates. Photos. I use my iPhone always on display all the time for this on a dock at my desk and it’s great. Would be wonderful to have a larger screen iPad provide this.I’m not sure what the usefulness of an Always-On iPad display would be. Can someone educate me?
Nope. I like my monitor to go into stand by and save me power. I have pictures in frames around my home for the family that require zero power and a watch that tells the time. That is if I'm not near the half dozen clocks and electrical devices around my home or office that have the time displayed as well. Do you need a photo frame and clock that sets you back four figures?I’ve been wanting it for a long time. Just nice to see my wallpaper and widgets/time. Don’t you like having your computer wallpaper/desktop showing and not going completely black after 1 minute?