you dont know what your talking about..bollox.LED LCD doesn't TOUCH the color production of plasma. I bought it on a black friday for $400 and I've always got positive comments about how crisp and colorful the picture quality is.
Motion also looks more natural than it does on LCD. The LCDs with high refresh rates suffer from the "soap opera effect" in which the motion looks annoyingly artifical.
LCD was a better option in the beginning when plasma suffered from silly issues such as burn in and poor life but this flaw has been fixed as such my TV kicks on a screen saver if its left on a static screen as well as the pixel shifting technology it uses prevents burn in.
Only things LED holds over plasma (in my opinion) is a non-reflective screen making it better in light rooms and produces blacks better (considering it can turn off parts of the screen)
Color production is very high on a plasma as well which makes video games much richer than LED LCD.
This is just my opinion though.
you dont know what your talking about..bollox.
Great intuitive counter argument chap. Sorry you're the one that hasn't a clue.
I own both in fact the Samsung is three times the price the plasma is and the plasma (cheap emerson)just kills the LCD. So really it's an insult to me that the plasma is better than the tv I paid three times as much for.
lol, your clueless
On a more serious note, the retina iPad has ruined the iPad 2 for me. My wife handed me her iPad 2 to read something and I was shocked how bad it looked, considering I absolutely loved the display on my iPad 1.
http://www.cnet.com.au/plasma-vs-lcd-which-is-right-for-you-240036500.htm
Spit out some facts or don't reply. It's rude.
PS - you're
some people say im rude, but i just tell them to piss off..
oh and your link is ********, im for LED not LCD. dummy..
blah blah blah..lol..Hey everyone, look at the tough guy. He is real tough. Everyone be scared of him. He doesn't understand contractions, but he will say words he learned from a young age that will make you appear tough and manly and all sorts. It commands instant respect and obedience.
Since I'm not a reactionary posturing narcissist, I'll admit that there is some miscommunication in this thread. I was arguing for Plasma vs LCD and not LED Backlit LCD. But, for that argument you can go here:
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57344058-221/led-lcd-vs-plasma-vs-lcd/
Again, I have a huge room, so viewing angle is important. The room has plantation shutters, so getting it nice and dark is not an issue. For me, the contrast ratio and black levels make or break the picture. They are all close enough in color clarity that it wasn't enough of a deciding factor. I don't think iEvolution is 100% right, but at least I know how to counter with a valid, thought out argument rather then resorting to name calling.
That was 1. The eye strain from wonky alternate polarized glasses, or your realization you must paid $30+ for,you and your honey to see Fern Gulley 2: In Space.I would never trade in my Avatar IMAX 3d experience. I had a tear in my eye within the first 5 minutes. But I still go to the movies just to get out the house and to give my kids something to do. The best thing I remember as a child was my mom taking me to see return of the Jedi. There are plenty of movies I regret not seeing in the theater.
blah blah blah..lol..
im with rob on this, most plasmas i have seen look really grey and washed out. LED ftw, lcd, then plasma in my books.
Though i prefer plasmas for gaming. the refresh rate always seems better.
I went to see a movie the other night after playing all week with my new iPad.
When the movie screen came on all I could think was, huh? is this really 4K?(the promo in begining said it was). The screen looked soft and muddy compared to what I was used to while using the iPad 3.
So during the whole film, instead of paying attention to the movie I just nitpicked the projection and critiqed the image quality.
I swear the 4K movie looked a whole lot worse than the beautiful retina display.
This happen to anyone else?
im with rob on this, most plasmas i have seen look really grey and washed out. LED ftw, lcd, then plasma in my books.
Though i prefer plasmas for gaming. the refresh rate always seems better.
I find that surprising. IME, plasmas have far richer colours and deeper blacks than LCDs.
The only reason I can think they'd be grey and washed out, is that plasma TVs are often shipped with the brightness and contrast dialled way down; for a certain "warm up" period (100 hours maybe, less or none at all on modern plasmas) and then you can turn them up to normal settings. In their normal settings, plasmas are anything but grey/washed-out.
ahhh well ive never owned, just looked at many when tv shopping. even when turned off they appear grey. from what i just googled, it appears plasmas dont do well in well lit rooms.
in store well lit
I've never had problems with greyness, but certainly the weakness with Plasmas is the reflectivity of the glass - as with glossy computer screens. For me, it's well worth the richness of the colours (when brightness & contrast is turned up) and the fluidity of the motion, but yes, that can be a pain.
ahhh well ive never owned, just looked at many when tv shopping. even when turned off they appear grey. from what i just googled, it appears plasmas dont do well in well lit rooms.
in store well lit