Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wow, you win dumbest post of the year award! I am successful middle aged person that loves the size of the iPhone 5. I am not a budget shopper who cannot afford the 6 or 6plus. I can afford any phone on the market and could afford to buy YOU 50 times over, bought lots and lots of Apple stock in 2002 and 2003, do the math, if you can. In the meantime continue to keep your face pointed towards your "big" phone 80% of your waking hours of the day, and continue to make stupid posts.

Well, it's true: Money can't buy manners! Do you realise how conceited your post reads as? Insulting and rude! I have money and would never dream of writing something like this...you must be new money one presumes.
 
I'm hopeful Apple will place all the latest/greatest in iPhone technology in the original iPhone casing for their 10th anniversary in 2016.

I'm honestly curious to see if Apple does anything special for iPhones 10th Anniversary. It'd be nice, but then the question comes, will it be out in late 2016 or late 2017 since the iPhone debut in early 2007 but didn't come out until June 2007.
 
Not a terribly credible source....

But I wouldn't be terribly surprised to see apple do a 4 inch model as well. I'm not necessarily expecting it, but I also wouldn't be blindsided by such an announcement. It wouldn't be unlike their MacBook lines.

I'd be most intrigued by pricing and specs.

I can see it filling the cheap/$0 on contract option.

iPhone 6S/6S+ would be $199/$299 like always
iPhone 6/6+ would be $99/$199 like always
iPhone 4" model would be free/$49
 
I can see it filling the cheap/$0 on contract option.

iPhone 6S/6S+ would be $199/$299 like always
iPhone 6/6+ would be $99/$199 like always
iPhone 4" model would be free/$49

I dare say the pricing should be inverted. From what I read so far on this forum, people who prefer a 4" iPhone are the more affluent crowd who want a more discrete phone where as the younger kids wants 5.5" or even bigger screen.

Kidding aside, do you realize that a couple hundred bucks is little compared to the cost of the plan for the life of an iPhone? The so call "budget" prices are for people who are bad at math. $200/2 years = $8 per month, the amount you save for buying a budget phone compared to $2000 you pay over the life of a phone in service.
 
Since it's not confirmed by Apple or corroborated by any credible sources, it's nothing more than a rumor. Exact same thing that happens every year with every version of the iPhone. I think people start throwing rumors out without any clue just so they can say "I told you so!" if it happens to come true. Sort of like throwing a bucket of crap against a wall and seeing how much sticks.

This. Exactly.
 
Kidding aside, do you realize that a couple hundred bucks is little compared to the cost of the plan for the life of an iPhone? The so call "budget" prices are for people who are bad at math. $200/2 years = $8 per month, the amount you save for buying a budget phone compared to $2000 you pay over the life of a phone in service.

The way I see it, service is service and it deoends on what you use it for. Why spend an extra $200 "just because" if you don't need to? Plenty of people pay far less for service than $2000 over two years. Our lines come out to be about $900 over two years (per line). For a large family with the maximum amount of lines on our same plan it could go down to $549 (again per line) over a two year period. People in TMobile are potentially even lower than that. $200 might just be $8 per month over two years, but if it's $8 I don't need to be spending then what's the point of spending it? I see it as far more foolish to buy more than you need because you can.
 
Last edited:
The way I see it, service is service and it deoends on what you use it for. Why spend an extra $200 "just because" if you don't need to? Plenty of people pay far less for service than $2000 over two years. Our lines come out to be about $900 over two years (per line). For a large family with the maximum amount of lines on our same plan it could go down to $549 (again per line) over a two year period. People in TMobile are potentially even lower than that. $200 might just be $8 per month over two years, but if it's $8 I don't need to be spending then what's the point of spending it? I see it as far more foolish to buy more than you need because you can.

By the same token, why buy the new model phone? Get last year model and save $100.

But as you say if you need to have the new model, that would imply you want current technology. For a 4" phone it would be whatever a 4.7" phone has, but a 4" screen, not last year chipsets in a new 4" body.
 
By the same token, why buy the new model phone? Get last year model and save $100.

But as you say if you need to have the new model, that would imply you want current technology. For a 4" phone it would be whatever a 4.7" phone has, but a 4" screen, not last year chipsets in a new 4" body.

That's my entire point. You can get last year's tech for $100 less. Except that it might not have what I want in. A phone (screen size being one of those things).

My entire response was based in the fact that some people want to save money (and they can). Other people want (or need or don't need) certain features.

These are all examples of people choosing ohones not because they are "bad at math" but because that was the decice that made the most sense to them at the time. There are many more factors that go into play than a person's ability to do math before they make a purchase.

I don't doubt that if Apple reintroduces the 4" device, it most likely won't be a "free low end" model. But that's not at all what I was responding to there.
 
hahahahaa not a chance

I've found those that 'long' for the ol' 4" or even 3.5" factor are more contrarian than would put their $$$ where their mouths are... even while they hold their newly upgraded 6's and 6+'s... :roll eyes:

One would argue by simply pointing to the sales and demand factor we've seen so far with this generation: its unprecedented. Nobody puts down close to at least $300+ in the millions if the screen was either too small or too big, it was enough to convert.

Who cares about the smaller screen or whatever! ! :p :p It's just noise!

Android conquest buyers (which continue to make up a lot of the current demand volume) are the sweetest plum because its so easy to say "I told you..." :apple:
 
Genius boy #1:
"Boss, the new meatball sandwiches sell well. We should stop offering all other sandwiches when we are done with the current stock"

Genius boy #2:
"Yep, that would keep thing simple. Two sizes: big and bigger"

Boss:
:(
 
I think a new iPhone with the full functionality of the iPhone 6 but with the screen size of the iPhone 5/5S would be a lot more popular than people think, especially in Europe and parts of Asia that are not enamored with the idea of a larger-screen phone.
 
Hmm, honestly doesn't sound like a bad idea.

4"
4.7"
5.5"

Choices...I like, I like. But, honestly, the 4.7" isn't even all that big. Once they shrink the bezels, it'd feel like a 4" phone in your hands. I wouldn't even bother with a 4" phone if I were Apple.
 
5S guts in a smaller iphone 6 body.... =the iphone 6 mini! The cost should not be anything crazy, and they can get rid of the 5c/5s at the same time.

Should sell like hot cakes to those who want a smaller pacakge or can't afford the 6/6+
 
If there are some technological advances with the next series of iPhones, and there is an uncompromised 4" version (that is to say, the same spec as the larger models) then I'm sold. However, with the trend to offer increasingly large devices, it's probably unlikely and those of us who are quite happy with the 5/5S form factor will eventually have to upsize at some point. I'm not bitter about that, but I also do feel that there's definitely a market out there for a premium smaller form factor device (even the 'compact' Android handsets are 4.7"+ these days).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.