Why is that the only option?
It doesn't have to be the only option. But right now it is. Apple is only offering their top tier phones in larger screen sizes. They are not currently providing smaller high end options.
Why is that the only option?
Wow, you win dumbest post of the year award! I am successful middle aged person that loves the size of the iPhone 5. I am not a budget shopper who cannot afford the 6 or 6plus. I can afford any phone on the market and could afford to buy YOU 50 times over, bought lots and lots of Apple stock in 2002 and 2003, do the math, if you can. In the meantime continue to keep your face pointed towards your "big" phone 80% of your waking hours of the day, and continue to make stupid posts.
I think it is WAY TOO EARLY to be believing rumors about the 7.![]()
I'm hopeful Apple will place all the latest/greatest in iPhone technology in the original iPhone casing for their 10th anniversary in 2016.
Not a terribly credible source....
But I wouldn't be terribly surprised to see apple do a 4 inch model as well. I'm not necessarily expecting it, but I also wouldn't be blindsided by such an announcement. It wouldn't be unlike their MacBook lines.
I'd be most intrigued by pricing and specs.
I can see it filling the cheap/$0 on contract option.
iPhone 6S/6S+ would be $199/$299 like always
iPhone 6/6+ would be $99/$199 like always
iPhone 4" model would be free/$49
Since it's not confirmed by Apple or corroborated by any credible sources, it's nothing more than a rumor. Exact same thing that happens every year with every version of the iPhone. I think people start throwing rumors out without any clue just so they can say "I told you so!" if it happens to come true. Sort of like throwing a bucket of crap against a wall and seeing how much sticks.
This. Exactly.
Kidding aside, do you realize that a couple hundred bucks is little compared to the cost of the plan for the life of an iPhone? The so call "budget" prices are for people who are bad at math. $200/2 years = $8 per month, the amount you save for buying a budget phone compared to $2000 you pay over the life of a phone in service.
The way I see it, service is service and it deoends on what you use it for. Why spend an extra $200 "just because" if you don't need to? Plenty of people pay far less for service than $2000 over two years. Our lines come out to be about $900 over two years (per line). For a large family with the maximum amount of lines on our same plan it could go down to $549 (again per line) over a two year period. People in TMobile are potentially even lower than that. $200 might just be $8 per month over two years, but if it's $8 I don't need to be spending then what's the point of spending it? I see it as far more foolish to buy more than you need because you can.
By the same token, why buy the new model phone? Get last year model and save $100.
But as you say if you need to have the new model, that would imply you want current technology. For a 4" phone it would be whatever a 4.7" phone has, but a 4" screen, not last year chipsets in a new 4" body.
At this point it's a rumor whether it's true or not.
That's why this forum is called MacRumors![]()