Ambrose Chapel said:the increased battery life is making me think about upgrading my original 5gig...the only question is whether the 40 is overkill...
khairulnz said:Sure the new iPods are cool... but I wouldnt call it a new generation of iPods. Its more like an enhanced iPod.
I actually thought we'd get :-
1. Colored screens - Though it may not be as popular as music just yet, I'm pretty sure a lot of people out there would love to watch their latest trailers or TV shows while commuting to work. This would surely appeal to those who are more inclined to Sony's new 20GB video players. Imagine your iPods playing your favourite selection of pictures as a screen saver. Thats just one example. Personalising my iPod would make the experience, well... more PERSONAL 🙂
iPod already HAS the capacity, why not take advantage and use it as a added value feature on the iPod? Trust me, this will certainly sell more iPods.
2. wi-fi enabled iPods for the new Airport Express - though i'm sure someone is gonna start producing wi-fi cards for the iPods, its just too bad Apple isnt already doing this.
And whats with the different color scroll wheel? The previous all white looks better. But this is subjective I guess. Apple products tend to look better after I've seen them first hand anyway.
Lets all pray that the items I've listed as my above is in the upcoming 60GB models. Hope you're reading this, Mr Jobs.
Cheers,
Khairul
If the click wheel is the same as the mini. It does move. Only up and down as if pressing buttons. The scrolling action is like a touch pad on a laptop and although I have never used a regular iPod, I would assume that wheel works the same as the mini.iChan said:no it isn't, it actually physically moves... thus how can it be non moving?
jimsowden said:I bet the 60gig will come out in Paris, seeing as how Toshiba leaked that apple wants 350,000 a month.
CubaTBird said:the 3g have no moving parts... 🙄
unsigned said:Isn't Apple trying to squish a G5 computer to fit in the space behind a flat screen monitor? A tiny 60gb hard drive might help.
Could account for numbers so high (they don't sell that many of their top-end ipods, do they?
stuepfnick said:...And for the 15 GB: They could get sell it cheaper... If Apple wants a 99$ iPod that would be the way to go for. A 199$ 10 GB Version...
But that would cannibalize iPod mini sales... so the 20 GB is the entry now... A mini with 10 gig would be interesting too (4 gig is too small for me! -> whole music collection + a lot of data storage)
ArticulatedArm said:Wasn't that model slightly more rounded than the original?
Or did they change the wheel slightly?
Or thinner maybe?
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you have no idea what you're talking about. The audio output from the ipod is extremely good, many recording artists use it for work. The Zen from creative has a better audio output not in quality, but in effects. It can emulate different levels of echo. However, the headphones that come with the Zen are junk deserve to be stuffed in to a garbage can. From my personal experience most of the audio output from the different Harddrive MP3 players are more or less born equal. It is the headphones that make the bulk of the difference. I have a pair of bose quiet comfort II, which basically makes my ipod feel like aural cocaine.Jalexster said:I'll keep complaining as long as I like! I still think that everyone should buy an iPod, but nothing can stop me going on and on and on about other brands! I'm trying to pass a subtle message here. "Buy an iPod, Don't buy an iRiver, because I'm buying one. You should buy an iPod." It's a hidden message! Don't you get it? If you don't get an iPod.
Also, about Battery Life. I remeber hearing that in order to reduce the size of the 3G iPod, they decreased the quality of the battery to one thats alot lower quality. Thats why the battery life isn't good.
Finally, about the 4G iPod having better battery life, Apple probably made the headphone amp/sound processing even lower quality, to save battery life. If this is the case, it's an incredible achivement for Apple, because it is a breakthrough to make an amp, that is that crap. I didn't even know it was possible to make something that crap. Maybe the haven't, maybe they have. We'll have to wait and see.
Ok, thats my rant finished.
mcarvin said:You know, as I was going through this thread (and most but not all of last night's when the image first got posted), I can't help but to try and make a connection between the "unusual" PR scheme mentioned by Think Secret et al and the first image being found on MSNBC. MS still equals Microsoft, right? Apple uses their nemesis' news outlet to generate the mainstream buzz about the flagship product. To me, that's ballsy.
voodoofish said:They won't add radio transmission as it is illegal in Europe (or at least it is in the UK... it's because it interfers with commercial radio signals)
millypede said:Well looking on all the Developers/Sales/Training sections on Apples sites there is nothing in there at all about these iPods. usualy we get some info before thier release, so that any new firmware/software for the iPods can be tested with software that we create.