I'm amused at the irony that for a game calling itself "Brain Challenge", there is a blonde with glasses perched above its title.
Oh, those are glasses? And here I thought it was a unibrow...
I'm amused at the irony that for a game calling itself "Brain Challenge", there is a blonde with glasses perched above its title.
Those brain training games are for a number of systems, including the Wii and PSP. I've played a couple for the Wii and DS. They're kind of addicting. If it's anything like those $20 games, $5 is worth it.
No, but Nintendo started the new fad about it. Ever since Brain Training came out in Japan and sold like nuts, then Brain Age over here, everyone has been making "brain games" using terms like "Train your brain!" You never saw catchphrases like that prior.Nintendo did not create the handheld brain exercise game franchise, though. These games have existed on other mobile devices, Tiger Electronics handheld games, those big TI calculators, and if you wanna get really ancient:
...I love Nintendo; they've progressed video games in much the same way as Apple has progressed computers, and I'm sure they'll do it again. However, I don't think Nintendo will, or even desires to legally pursue Apple for compensation. As I've said, no one buys an iPod as a gaming system. That's what Nintendo's for. As for the iPod, their games are more of an afterthought, and I think Nintendo is confident in their current position in this market.
Brain Age (Brain Training in Japan) and Big Brain Academy are made by Nintendo. Everyone and their brother has been ripping it off since. There are ripoffs for the PSP.
This is just another ripoff.
I'm amused at the irony that for a game calling itself "Brain Challenge", there is a blonde with glasses perched above its title.
How old are you people? 11?
$5 isn't a big investment and nobody is forcing you to buy it. I went ahead and purchased it because I enjoy the brain games on my DS and Wii and it turned out to be a smart choice. Had it not been, I would have been out $5.
Really, people. It's $5. How much do you blow at Starbucks, Dunkin Donuts, or, since most of you are 11, the candy store in one visit?
That's a bad strawman. A responding to a complaint that the game costs $5 is not implying that paying for software should be a requirement.
I'm really annoyed at people who think that software should always be free, but that doesn't mean that I don't think developers should release software for free. As you said, it's totally up to the developer. This developer chose to charge money for it
Not one person here implied that software should never be free.
lazyrighteye said:Exactly.
iPhone apps represent HUGE revenue stream(s) for developers and their efforts will not (nor should not) go uncompensated.
Thus, consumers will pay for their products... possibly via iTS, to help Apple maintain a high level of control.
Good one. Personally attack everyone who thinks $5 is generally too much for many of these games they release. By your logic of 'it's $5' you don't have any problem sending me $5/week for the indefinite future?
Everyone is different, but I don't consider these games to be a good value at $5 each. And, if a SDK ever really does come out, there will be free ports of many fun games.
Brain Age and Big Brain Academy are not made by Nintendo. They are made by Touch Generations.