As of now, it is based on rumors and constraint in supply chain due to the pandemic.
Jon prossor’s sources are saying it will be announced by next week...guess we will see in a week
As of now, it is based on rumors and constraint in supply chain due to the pandemic.
Jon prossor’s sources are saying it will be announced by next week...guess we will see in a week
The original SE was about moving downmarket: coming up with a way to sell an iPhone at the never before seen price point of $349/399. The only way to do that was using a 2.5 year old model, whatever that be.
If in 2016 Apple could have gotten to that price with a 4.7” model, there never would have been another 4.0” iPhone. People wanted bigger screens, evidenced by the smash hit of 2014’s new 4.7” and 5.5” form factors introduced with iPhone 6.
Similarly, today if Apple could find a way offer the 5.5” Plus at $399, we wouldn’t be getting another 4.7” iPhone now. Because a 5.5” iPhone at $399 would sell better than will a 4.7” iPhone at $399.
Android switchers especially don’t want small screens. They’re used to getting a large screen at $250, let alone $399. A 4.7” screen is a joke to them. In 3-4 years when the newest SE is a 5.5” screen, it’ll finally be big enough for them.
When???
But one thing is for sure the battery life will blow away the battery life on the 6s, as well as the camera.
At $349/399, and reusing old parts from the 5s, the SE was clearly a budget model. They had the flagship 6s at $649, and the flagship 6s Plus at $749.Look, you are bewilder about the original SE as a budget model and it's clearly not about the price. People are interested in SE due to the smaller form factor with newer specs.
At $349/399, and reusing old parts from the 5s, the SE was clearly a budget model. They had the flagship 6s at $649, and the flagship 6s Plus at $749.
If they had wanted, they certainly could have introduced a flagship 4.0” iPhone at $549 or so. But they didn’t. Instead, they introduced a budget model that left off high end features except the SoC and rear camera—so it could be sold at $349/399.
Sure, some bought the SE because it was small sized. But many bought because it was the least expensive iPhone available.
I bought two of them myself, because they were low priced. If I could have gotten a 4.7” or 5.5” iPhone for the price of an SE, I would have bought one of those instead.
At $349/399, and reusing old parts from the 5s, the SE was clearly a budget model. They had the flagship 6s at $649, and the flagship 6s Plus at $749.
If they had wanted, they certainly could have introduced a flagship 4.0” iPhone at $549 or so. But they didn’t. Instead, they introduced a budget model that left off high end features except the SoC and rear camera—so it could be sold at $349/399.
Sure, some bought the SE because it was small sized. But many bought because it was the least expensive iPhone available.
I bought two of them myself, because they were low priced. If I could have gotten a 4.7” or 5.5” iPhone for the price of an SE, I would have bought one of those instead.