Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Uhg, same ol’ traditional display and a rapidly becoming yesterdays news M2 chip……….move along folks, nothing to see here, just an ‘interim‘ device until the actual upgraded models become available.
 
I don't understand why this is launching with a year old chip? The M3 is going to be a bigger leap forward on the 3nm process. Between that and the rumored OLED upgrade next year, it doesn't make sense to buy this thing unless you absolutely need it. And it didn't exist until now, so that seems unlikely for most. Basically Apple is betting on the new screen size pushing their margins higher on old hardware. I'm sure some exec is getting a fat bonus for coming up with this plan.

This crowd practically melts down at the idea that there could be ANY M3 in a Mac before every other Mac has M2 in it.

I'm of the mind that if M3 is ready, launch it... and M4 as soon as it is ready too. However, there seems to be a great wall of people here who are extraordinarily hung up on what numbers are painted on top of chips they will likely never see.

I'll hope for M3 with anyone who dares to share such a hope. But other rumors imply that there may not be enough M3 yields yet for the most popular Mac to launch with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
I doubt Apple cares about unsold chips that much, since they've already been paid for. The incremental cost of an M1 probably isn't that high. There's a cost to producing them, but it's not like having a bunch of x86 chips sitting around that you paid hard dollars for.

Apple's marketing department historically has been pretty good at feature/price differentiation. Here's the current lineup. These are base prices and specs:

MBA M1 13.3" -> $999
MBA M2 13.6" -> $1199
MBP M2 13.3" -> $1299
MBP M2 Pro 14" -> $1999
MBP M2 Pro 16" -> $2499

There's an obvious slot at $1599. This implies that the MBA 15 will have an M2. At any configuration the 15" MBA obviates the the 13.3" MBP, so unless the MBP 13 gets some kind of bump like an XDR display it's gone. Even now the MBP 13 doesn't make any sense, since you're paying $100 for 2 hours of battery life and a smaller screen relative to the MBA M2.
 
I don't understand why this is launching with a year old chip? The M3 is going to be a bigger leap forward on the 3nm process. Between that and the rumored OLED upgrade next year, it doesn't make sense to buy this thing unless you absolutely need it. And it didn't exist until now, so that seems unlikely for most. Basically Apple is betting on the new screen size pushing their margins higher on old hardware. I'm sure some exec is getting a fat bonus for coming up with this plan.

Classic Tim Cook Apple - trim the marks. Everyone can see the M3 version coming 6-9 months down, but there will be enough people who end up buying both to make this worthwhile for Apple (plus they get to use up the surplus of M2 chips)

That's a ridiculous take on it. What's wrong with a choice?

MacBook Air M1 13" - Entry level
MacBook Air M2 13" & 15" - Mainstream consumer models
MacBook Pro 14" & 16" - Premium consumer models

Please explain how this is messy. I'd love to understand.
You forgot the 13" MBP. The range should simply be two sizes of MBA and two sizes of MBP.

MBA M1 13.3" -> $999
MBA M2 13.6" -> $1199
MBP M2 13.3" -> $1299
MBP M2 Pro 14" -> $1999
MBP M2 Pro 16" -> $2499

There's an obvious slot at $1599. This implies that the MBA 15 will have an M2. At any configuration the 15" MBA obviates the the 13.3" MBP, so unless the MBP 13 gets some kind of bump like an XDR display it's gone. Even now the MBP 13 doesn't make any sense, since you're paying $100 for 2 hours of battery life and a smaller screen relative to the MBA M2.
I'm calling $1399 or $1499. That way, speccing up to 16/512 brings you to within $100 of the 14" Pro which is the classic Tim pricing ladder.
 
I think it will carry the M2.5 Version. I really don't see Apple releasing a new Mac carrying last year's chip. It will mostly be redefined version of the M2 chip series.
They have yet to update the iMac to the M2 chip.
I think they will do exactly just that at WWDC, considering they have a hard time selling those base M2 chips.

I don't see them working on another base M2 variant, when this team should be working on M3, M4 and M5 at this point.
 
Ugh, that is the lone downside to my M2 MBA. Otherwise, it is their most perfect laptop to date. Not everyone has to be editing 4k video for major motion pictures to want/need a dual monitor setup. Designers, writers, etc., have use cases for dual monitor support that don't necessitate the added power/cost of, say, a MBP.

I do think the 15" MBA will come with M2 as I believe 1) they're saving the M3 to debut in MacPro and 2) the larger screen size alone will see customers hitting Buy at a rate not yet seen for an Apple computer.

I have a 14" MBP, which I love. BUT the base M2 Air that I have as a secondary non-work laptop, has exceeded every expectation. I could literally use it for all of my work needs but for the fact that it only allows one external display. Apple silicon power really makes light of everything that I need a computer for and the base M2 chews up my office productivity, short video editing projects, Logic Pro as easily as the M1Pro. It is remarkable.

My only thing is that I need lots of screen real estate for my world of large spreadsheets, Word documents, PDFs, email and browser tabs, but I don't need MxPro/Max CPU performance.

Exactly, still limited in functionality, because has to leave room for upsell to the MacBook Pro 14 or 16 inch; and that is probably what this MacBook Air is designed for more than anything. You can just read the internal training material, if potential buyer brings up multiple display, gently note, this device is limited to one display then say, 'however, we have the 16 in MacBook Pro here that will support multiple 8K displays and includes HDMI 1.2 and this might be a better fit for you.

Yeah, its like we really want this thing with M2 only.

Insightful, as always, @Mr. Dee.

Still - I think they're missing an alternative upselling trick here. There's a niche of folks who might want a bigger screen (i.e. 15") and also external displays in a thin and light form factor. The executive Apple ultrabook if you will. They could price it accordingly i.e. as a luxury laptop for those who want the slim design, but don't need the power of the big boy CPUs. I would pay for it.

DisplayLink docks work. I'm sure there's some tradeoffs, but it's better than one monitor.

I've always been wary of this because of the performance hit and/or possible glitches.
 
My only thing is that I need lots of screen real estate for my world of large spreadsheets, Word documents, PDFs, email and browser tabs, but I don't need MxPro/Max CPU performance.
I think the lack of dual monitor support is what is going to push me to the MBP. I don’t anticipate using those dual monitors too often, but I definitely want the option if I ever use the laptop in place of my desktop machine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
I don't understand why this is launching with a year old chip? The M3 is going to be a bigger leap forward on the 3nm process. Between that and the rumored OLED upgrade next year, it doesn't make sense to buy this thing unless you absolutely need it. And it didn't exist until now, so that seems unlikely for most. Basically Apple is betting on the new screen size pushing their margins higher on old hardware. I'm sure some exec is getting a fat bonus for coming up with this plan.
This is typical of apple though. They did the same with Apple silicon in the M1. They released the M1 in old products before redesigning products.

They want to milk as much as they can from customers...and use up existing inventory/components.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
If it's lighter than 4lbs and has a higher resolution, then I'm in. I don't care about >18 hours battery life, as cool as that is... I'm looking for something lighter than the MBPro and with a better resolution than the 13" Air.
Do you mean better PPI or resolution? Surely as the screen is larger than the 13", the resolution will be increased to keep the PPI that is needed for "Retina" quality. But it will probably be on-par, quality-wise, with the 13".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
That's a ridiculous take on it. What's wrong with a choice?

MacBook Air M1 13" - Entry level
MacBook Air M2 13" & 15" - Mainstream consumer models
MacBook Pro 14" & 16" - Premium consumer models

Please explain how this is messy. I'd love to understand.
Factor in pricing that is available (given some products are older and discounted more and some aren't), any of those models you listed can be within $100 of each other, especially when you factor in the ridiculous upgrade prices from anemic base specs. Example -- MBA 15" with 16GB/512GB may very well be more expensive than a sale price on a 14" M1 Pro (or even 16" M1 Pro if that $1500 deal comes back around).
 
I don’t like this. Things are getting too messy. Why don’t they just release one for every inch? Won’t be long where it’s similar to the pre-Jobs era of crazy number of products.
For a very long time, Apple has offered two screen sizes for each laptop line they sell.

Do you recall that it wasn't too many years ago that the MBA came in 11" and 13" screen sizes?
 
For a very long time, Apple has offered two screen sizes for each laptop line they sell.

Do you recall that it wasn't too many years ago that the MBA came in 11" and 13" screen sizes?
There was no 12” MacBook Pro. This will just confuse users. 15” MacBook Air or 14” MacBook Pro. But the air has bigger screen! It will confuse users. There were a lot of choices before Steve Jobs cleaned up the products. Doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.

I’m just massively frustrated with Apple right now with their treatment of pro users. I don’t want to hear about Airs that my parents or grandparents use. I need more pro focused items. Is it really going to be M3 before the higher end desktop systems even iMac get updated?
 
Last edited:
DisplayLink docks work. I'm sure there's some tradeoffs, but it's better than one monitor.

I'd only be consider DisplayLink if it's as reliable as a standard display. I've wasted too much time working with cranky software. Geez, even my Anker a8384 usb-c hub flakes out so that my displays don't work until I kill power on it.

Two external monitors is a hard requirement for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange Bat
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.