Any chance the MBP 16" will get the 10th gen Intel processor when the updated MBP 13" is announced?
Are the 45W H Series shipping yet?
Any chance the MBP 16" will get the 10th gen Intel processor when the updated MBP 13" is announced?
The thing is Apple can inform intel to produce a 7w 4-cores CPU for the MBA years ago or in 2016 which is certainly a
possibility.
The harsh truth is that TIM COOK does not share the same visionary as SJ for pushing the boundaries of technology for the mac lineup.
In fact, TIM COOK is notorious for turning it into overpriced product with less innovation over the years and let's not forget the fiasco of butterfly mechanisms that took years to admit its failure.
The MacBook Air also requires a fan to squeeze adequate performance out of the Y series chip, Either stepping up to the better performance of a 15W U series (especially for the better graphics, the HD 617 is worse than the HD 6000 in the 2015 MBA!) or going with a custom Arm CPU (which iPads demonstrate seem to actually be able to give half decent sustained performance without active cooling) seems to be better than this worst of all worlds compromise.
I doubt we'll see a 15 Watt chip again in the Air. That spot has been taken by the lower-end (2 ports) 13" MBP.
Any chance the MBP 16" will get the 10th gen Intel processor when the updated MBP 13" is announced?
The thing is Apple can inform intel to produce a 7w 4-cores CPU for the MBA years ago or in 2016 which is certainly a possibility.
The harsh truth is that TIM COOK does not share the same visionary as SJ for pushing the boundaries of technology for the mac lineup. In fact, TIM COOK is notorious for turning it into overpriced product with less innovation over the years and let's not forget the fiasco of butterfly mechanisms that took years to admit its failure.
Are the 45W H Series shipping yet?
Intel then screwed up hard, couldn't get performance up much, and eventually had to increase the TDP by 56% for Amber Lake. Then that still wasn't realistic, and they increased it another 29% for Ice Lake.
That one does exist in a four-core setup. But it does four years later than what you're claiming would have been possible, and it still isn't shipping in volume. So even today, four years later, and at twice the original promised TDP, Apple still doesn't actually have this option other than on paper.
No, the thing is Intel promised, with the Core M branding (that was discontinued after a single revision) in Broadwell, that they would have 4.5W CPUs that would keep improving.
That's what the MacBook was based on.
Intel then screwed up hard, couldn't get performance up much, and eventually had to increase the TDP by 56% for Amber Lake. Then that still wasn't realistic, and they increased it another 29% for Ice Lake.
That one does exist in a four-core setup. But it does four years later than what you're claiming would have been possible, and it still isn't shipping in volume. So even today, four years later, and at twice the original promised TDP, Apple still doesn't actually have this option other than on paper.
The harsh truth is Intel overpromised and underdelivered. If you want to blame Tim Cook for something, it's trusting Intel's schedule.
No, actually, let's forget it, because it has nothing to do with this.
[automerge]1584471632[/automerge]
If you put a 15W U in there, though, you basically have the base-model 13-inch MacBook Pro. The Air is thinner and lighter, and offers more battery life, but the Pro gives you the Touch Bar (yes yes I know), Bluetooth 5.0, better speakers, wide color, a brighter display, and of course a much better CPU and GPU.
It's… basically… if you want better performance than the Air? For $200, you really get your money's worth.
[automerge]1584471683[/automerge]
Yup.
People can complain that the 2018-era Air is kind of underpowered compared to its predecessor, but… the Pro does exist, and it's not much more.
[automerge]1584471742[/automerge]
If suitable 10th gen Comet Lake H processors (45 W) are available in time, that's a possibility. And even if, I think that's rather unlikely since the device has just been introduced in November. I could imagine a refresh at WWDC the earliest.Any chance the MBP 16" will get the 10th gen Intel processor when the updated MBP 13" is announced?
So Apple would probably not put the 10nm Ice Lake processors in this new Air? Interesting.
Then chances are they are going to use Comet Lake Y series. Whats the performance increase of that over the current Air?
So basically you are saying there ARE nothing wrong even if APPLE PRODUCTS COMPLETELY WENT TO THE WRONG DIRECTION! BRAVO!
If suitable 10th gen Comet Lake H processors (45 W) are available in time, that's a possibility. And even if, I think that's rather unlikely since the device has just been introduced in November. I could imagine a refresh at WWDC the earliest.
[EDIT] I see, others have answered that already. I should've refreshed the page before replying.
If it hasn't failed you in over 3 years, why would you expect it to now? It's not like it has to fail at some point..
It still doesn't seem like Ice Lake-Y is shipping in any relevant volume at all, after half a year. So Apple might skip it altogether, which is a shame, because it would offer nicer battery life (though the Air's is arguably already good enough), much improved graphics (where the Air is quite lacking), and twice the cores.
Comet Lake-Y wouldn't offer much of a graphics improvement. It would also double the cores, and its CPU would be faster than Ice Lake's. (It's confusing.) Ice Lake's graphics would roughly be twice as fast as Comet Lake's.
Or they might skip those altogether and not upgrade the Air until Tiger Lake-Y later in the year. Which would once again give graphics a significant boost.
The new MacBook Air delivers up to two times faster CPU performance and up to 80 percent faster graphics performance,
So, turns out I was pessimistic about that, and I guess Ice Lake-Y production is finally ramping up — today's MacBook Air is all Ice Lake.
We'll see about benchmarks (doubling the core sure won't hurt), but at the very least, it'll help with graphics performance. Which is basically what Apple is touting:
So there you have it: the first 10nm Mac, only about four years late.
I don't know where they got the info from but someone in the other thread seems to think the i5 and i7 might be running TDP up at 12W as well!That's honestly impressive. But that also means the quad core (i5 and i7) options have beefier graphics than the dual core (i3) base model, doesn't it?
Although Intel calls all of them "Iris Plus" now, there's G4 and G7 tiers with 48 and 64 EUs respectively. The base model probably has the former, looking at Intel's ARK.
Will also be interesting to see whether the base model retains the same (kind of semi-passive) cooling system as before. For the quad core options that probably won't suffice. Can't wait for iFixit to tear down all of them!
Although Intel calls all of them "Iris Plus" now, there's G4 and G7 tiers with 48 and 64 EUs respectively. The base model probably has the former, looking at Intel's ARK.
Guess what? My n key doesn't work 100% of the times... here we go. I just remembered somebody quoted me about that
I have an USB keyboard, I was thinking about buying the new Air and returning it before 14 days but it doesn't ship for 3 weeks. The 16 is really expensive so I don't feel like spending so much even if I eventually get them back.
I guess I'm going to wait for the quarantine to end, then I'll send it for repair, I still have AC and the keyboard is covered anyway. Looks like it finally broke once I started using it full time...
That's honestly impressive. But that also means the quad core (i5 and i7) options have beefier graphics than the dual core (i3) base model, doesn't it?
Although Intel calls all of them "Iris Plus" now, there's G4 and G7 tiers with 48 and 64 EUs respectively. The base model probably has the former, looking at Intel's ARK. Both should be decent upgrades over the previous UHD 617 though.
Uh oh, that's bad (corona) timing..
My MBP's keyboard (the 2016 version) held up well for almost 3 years of heavy usage, before, of all keys, the TAB key started to act up. So Apple replaced the whole top case with the 2017 version (yay, new battery for free!). Half a year since, and that keyboard's been fine.
I'm really sad to see the butterfly keyboard go away, now of all times, after reliability and noise have been fixed for good with the 2019 version.. I love the precise and stable feel of mine, the direct and clicky response, just not the noise.
I was disappointed when I tried the 16" MBP's Magic Keyboard, it just feels more clunky and ponderous compared to the butterfly. Not as swift to type on, at least for me. Oddly enough it felt worse to me than the external Magic Keyboard, even though the mechanism seems to be nearly identical.
I guess I'll hold on to my 2016 MBP with the 2017 keyboard for some more years.
The 2016 keyboard is always replaced with the significantly more reliable 2017 version,Hopefully I'll receive the 2017 version as well, but did they change the internals?