TBT 4.0 is unlikely
Optical vs. non optical fight... go
My thought is that they should start including the external drive for any machine sold without an optical drive.
So they should be bulky and heavy for no reason other than to make them "feel" powerful?
No thanks.
I really dislike that technology moves so fast nowadays. I guess I just need to learn not be concerned with having the latest and greatest.
Optical vs. non optical fight... go
My thought is that they should start including the external drive for any machine sold without an optical drive.
Why? Just buy the cheap ass thing if you really need it so bad.
Why? Just buy the cheap ass thing if you really need it so bad.
That's been true for the last 30 years or so.
Apple still cares about Mac?
I am still all for having an optical drive. I really do not need my laptop to be light. I use my optical drive a lot. I'm one of the few people left who still purchase physical CDs.
It's funny Apple was so successful with the iMac at the desktop that includes all things needed in a single piece of computing machinery - whereas PCs tended to be cluttered with cables and appendices.
Now you are proposing the opposite directions for mobile computing - I don't find this appealing.
Optical vs. non optical fight... go
My thought is that they should start including the external drive for any machine sold without an optical drive.
Since when are Macs codenamed with the letter-number-letter format? I thought that was only for iOS devices, starting with the original iPhone (m68ap). Are they bringing this over to Macs now? I don't believe there are any current products referred to as k91, k92, etc.
Shouldn't this new MBP be called MacBookPro6,4 or something?
Ivy Bridge promises dramatic increases in battery life, making it a good time for a redesign.
Same analyst who predicted a drastically redesigned iPhone 5.
Redesign or not, it would be foolish to buy a Macbook Pro or Macbook Air without Ivy Bridge.
All I want is a quad core 13" MacBook Pro.