Thats great and all but it runs Windows.To Windows users, this is about as exciting as hearing your neighbor finally got a microwave oven.
Thats great and all but it runs Windows.To Windows users, this is about as exciting as hearing your neighbor finally got a microwave oven.
The person asked for a single source where Apple said OLED was inferior and I linked it. Here you are making excuses.
The person asked for a single source where Apple said OLED was inferior and I linked it. Here you are making excuses.
benefits of OLED technology could include increased brightness, higher contrast ratio with deeper blacks, improved power efficiency for longer battery life, and more.
Tell that to the butterfly keyboard.More than that, even if they did say, at someone in the past, that Mini was the future, that was in the past. Technologies change. It would be very stupid for a tech company to refuse to adapt if one kind of screen technology advances faster than another.
It's a bit like saying Apple are dishonest because they no longer say SCSI hard drives are the best storage option.
I don't care. Someone asked for something simple and I supplied it. Not here to argue the validity 13 years later.Can you actually stay on topic?
Do you think it is wrong that Apple, 13 years later, have a different opinion on the best screen technology to use?
And have you kept your own views on technology completely unchanged since 2013?
That's what I'm asking you.
The Butterfly keyboard was ... not good. And so they changed the keyboard design. What is your point?Tell that to the butterfly keyboard.
I don't care. Someone asked for something simple and I supplied it. Not here to argue the validity 13 years later.
Because it's a placeholder for a product that isn't launching for another 12 months and for which we don't know what the final design will look like until rumors start leaking when mass production begins.Why the photo still shows notches?
Assuming they're using tandem OLED instead of single layer that solves for the traditional drawbacks of OLED, namely that OLED can struggle to obtain the same peak brightness as traditional LED panels (and require more power draw to do so which in turn raises the risk of burn-in).For years, Apple told us that OLED was inferior and that nano-LED (not mini-LED) was the future. Now they’ve deprecated nano-LED project and now they're going to do the same for mini-LED and suddenly claim OLED is the best?
Assuming they're using tandem OLED instead of single layer that solves for the traditional drawbacks of OLED, namely that OLED can struggle to obtain the same peak brightness as traditional LED panels (and require more power draw to do so which in turn raises the risk of burn-in).
Hopefully the rumors of them getting much thinner and lighter are true (without heat issues, due to upcoming efficiencies in the M6 and OLED).
Can you actually stay on topic?
Do you think it is wrong that Apple, 13 years later, have a different opinion on the best screen technology to use?
And have you kept your own views on technology completely unchanged since 2013?
That's what I'm asking you.
Well, getting a screen as good as the current one on the MBP would definitely be exciting for almost all Windows users (including those with an OLED screen).To Windows users, this is about as exciting as hearing your neighbor finally got a microwave oven.
No, I'm claiming the opposite.Ridiculous. Are you claiming OLED was good 13 years ago? Because it was crap. Green or blue color casts, potential for burn-in, poor viewing angles, color change over time (a biggie for anyone who needs accurate color like photographers/videographers).
Apple switched to OLED on the iPhone when the quality/reliability matched their standards.
But then, you’re still stuck using Windows. yuckTo Windows users, this is about as exciting as hearing your neighbor finally got a microwave oven.
This. I do wonder what's going to happen. I know a hell of a lot of people with various M1 ( + pro, Max etc.) Macs, and none of them feel they "need" to upgrade. I've a M2 Pro, same thing. Nice shiny tech is lovely to get, but it's difficult to justify an upgrade beyond "I want the new shiny thing!"Current models are so good it will take a lot to improve them ...
No, I'm claiming the opposite.
The other commenter is saying that because Apple said in 2013 that micro-LED was a better bet than OLED, and now Apple are touting OLED, that Apple are somehow being "dishonest"
Which is nonsense.
I'm saying that saying that micro-LED seeming a better bet in 2013, and changing your mind in favor of OLED over 10 years later is a healthy approach.
CHanign your mind is good, because some technologies develop more quicker and get better more quickly than other, and companies should choose the best technology that suits their purposes at that point in time.
You're agreeing with me.
No worries.Yes, hence the “meant to reply to the other poster” note I put at the bottom. I replied to the wrong person. 😢