Considering the A18 Pro only has 8GB RAM it would be silly to assume it had more…I smell 8GB RAM. Apple never design their SoC to support anything over what it needs.
You wouldn’t expect Apple to manufacture a different model for this would you.
Considering the A18 Pro only has 8GB RAM it would be silly to assume it had more…I smell 8GB RAM. Apple never design their SoC to support anything over what it needs.
because an iPad and keyboard already exists and apple has made it crystal clear a MacBook is not an iPad and vice versaWhy not? It has a menu bar and runs windows now. Anyone looking for a sub-$1000 laptop probably doesn't care about running Xcode or anything that requires an M-series CPU.
This schtick is getting old. I wonder if you and others made the same insinuations about Steve Jobs when he showcased the iMac, DV, DV+ and Special Edition models.Yep! Exactly right.
Every aspect of every product lineup is Tim "Cooked" to specifically make you constantly think about going up a tier in one way or another.
He's like the tech equivalent of the people doing the science to make potato chips irresistible.
They can use older NAND and limit external display support, and perhaps include a less advanced internal display than even the MacBook Air. It might have only 1 memory option and limited storage options (256GB and 512GB) to reduce production costs.I wonder how they'll pull the price down. 16GB RAM and 256GB of storage seems as a foregone conclusion for AI. The chips itself can't be that cheap if they're using the newest and greatest.
except this MacBook is 13 inches according to the original post, and the last thing you’re gonna want to do with an iPhone chip is X86 emulation.Someone who needs to run desktop software that doesn't require a lot of horsepower and is on a tight budget.
Someone asked in r/FidelityInvestments if Active Trader Pro could run on an iPad. The answer was no. It's an x86 program which runs on Windows or macOS via WINE. I think that this would be better for a 10-12 inch MacBook than another 13.
This schtick is getting old.
The actual cost of a component has very little to do with what Apple charges. See RAM, SSD upgrades, the entire Mac Pro, etcThis is just a bizarre rumor/product. Estimates are that the M1 costs Apple ~$40/chip, and the A18 costs...~$40/chip. So what's the point?
Presumably:If iPhones, iPads, and Macs all sharing the same chips then any software restrictions at this point are purely arbitrary.
Apple has decided against the plastic watch because it cannot fulfil the quality requirements. It scratches incredibly quickly and looks cheap and ugly.Perhaps this will accompany the fabled plastic Apple Watch?
Those production costs may have come down some since the A18 is not a "new" chip anymore. It could also be that a surplus of those chips exists. 🤷♂️This is just a bizarre rumor/product. Estimates are that the M1 costs Apple ~$40/chip, and the A18 costs...~$40/chip. So what's the point?
How difficult would it be for Apple to use the A19 Pro instead? If this were just about using up extra A18 Pro chips, it would be easier just to give the iPad mini a spec bump next year than develop an entirely new product.Considering the A18 Pro only has 8GB RAM it would be silly to assume it had more…
You wouldn’t expect Apple to manufacture a different model for this would you.
With a smaller bezel and a notch they can fit a "13 inch" screen. And the A18 is faster than the M1 even for multicore tasks. It could run WINE for basic Windows applications easily (lack of Rosetta support in 2 years is the bigger issue).except this MacBook is 13 inches according to the original post, and the last thing you’re gonna want to do with an iPhone chip is X86 emulation.
and it’s likely the budget for this computer will still be likely around $1000, maybe $599 at the lowest.
We don't know if this is a Macbook yet. That's a marketing term, and Kuo is frequently wrong about that kind of thing.because an iPad and keyboard already exists and apple has made it crystal clear a MacBook is not an iPad and vice versa
Fortunately (if I’m interested in one when it comes out) I work in an “education channel.”If so, this may ONLY be available through education channels and not at retail.
we are talking about a laptop That’s apparently supposed to be cheaper, I don’t think thinner bezels are really on the menu I’m afraid.With a smaller bezel and a notch they can fit a "13 inch" screen. And the A18 is faster than the M1 even for multicore tasks. It could run WINE for basic Windows applications easily (lack of Rosetta support in 2 years is the bigger issue).
The bezels on the 12" MacBook were huge by today's standards. But yes, it's certainly possible they use the existing MacBook Air chassis or even the M1 chassis if the main objective is a low price.we are talking about a laptop That’s apparently supposed to be cheaper, I don’t think thinner bezels are really on the menu I’m afraid.
I just watched DosDude resurrect one of developer kits. So an A-series is certainly capable. Interestingly the A-12 and up is getting the new iPadOS.Glad someone else remembers that. I was going to be pedantic and complain about the “never used an A-series chip in a Mac before” bit.