Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's see how long she is going to have that PC before it breaks down. I guess less than 1 year. :D

It's USER Error. Anyone can screw up a mac in less than a year do, downloading anything and everything, taking care of it, etc.
 
I have to say it but I think it is a pretty good ad. The economy, savings, value are all front page stuff right now and it goes right to it. I have 3 Macs and will probably be buying a new 24" iMac this weekend because I do know you get what you pay for. But....the average person....and she obviously was an average user.....the ad makes a really compelling case.

If I really thought it would make a difference with Apple I would wait a month or so to buy my new iMac but my old 17" G5 is starting to show its age (but then again, I still should be able to get about $500 for it I bet).
 
Why stop at a cheap HP laptop? There are a ton of refurbished laptops for $100, running XP. Seems like she could use the savings to pay 3 months of her car payment. Would her experience be any different?
 
Those of us who used BOTH PC's and Mac's extensively know that you can get the SAME or BETTER quality hardware in a PC versus a Mac at about 70% of the price. Plus a world of more hardware options and flexibility. In terms of hardware alone, a well built PC will always come in for less money for the same quality components. Always. It's called competition. You can even have one custom made to specs chosing everything from your specific motherboard to RAM type etc. You can't do that with a Mac even at the inflated price. If you think differently, then you're just being a Mac fanboy. :)

Now, in terms of the SOFTWARE O/S, it's debatable which is better. But that's a DIFFERENT issue.

Tony

A Dell Laptop at $700:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9166564&type=product&id=1218041148773

The $1000 Macbook:

http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB881LL/A?mco=MzE2NjMyOA

Processor: Both are Intel Core 2 Duo running at 2 GHz.

Screen Size: Dell 15.4"; Mac 13"

RAM: Dell 4GB DDR2; Mac 2GB DDR2

Hard Drive: Dell 320 GB at 5400 RPM; Mac 120 GB at 5400 RPM

'Nuf said. :)
 
I get the point of the ad and all, but why a _17"_ laptop? Do most people actually buy 17" laptops? I thought only graphic designers and such only felt the need for such massively impractical laptops, with most people going for 12–15" models.

You do know that the 17" MBP weights about the same as most 15" PC laptop??? Not massive. I use my 17" MBP every day.


Why would you want a $1000 17" laptop?

17" laptops aren't very portable, and are only really suited to those people who need the large screen for professional work while going on-site.

But you're not going to get a pro laptop for $1000. Especially a 17" one.

Photographers, DJ, etc. Anyone who need the screen real estate.
 
She's not cool enough to own a Mac so she goes for the cheap garbage alternative.
 
Macs are overpriced though.

You need to find a dictionary and look up the definition of the word "overpriced", I think.

A Dell Laptop at $700:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9166564&type=product&id=1218041148773

The $1000 Macbook:

http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB881LL/A?mco=MzE2NjMyOA

Processor: Both are Intel Core 2 Duo running at 2 GHz.

Screen Size: Dell 15.4"; Mac 13"

RAM: Dell 4GB DDR2; Mac 2GB DDR2

Hard Drive: Dell 320 GB at 5400 RPM; Mac 120 GB at 5400 RPM

'Nuf said. :)

Dell: Windows.
Mac: OS X.

"NUF" said.
 
Besides, Apple isn't going for the mass market, its making pretty good money with just 5-10%. I wouldn't actually want to see Apple with much larger share than that, too many compromises.
 
Sure Lauren... you've got just what you want it... a laptop, 17 inch, viruses, crashes, lag... and so on..
everything you want it... or didnt
 
A Dell Laptop at $700:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9166564&type=product&id=1218041148773

The $1000 Macbook:

http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB881LL/A?mco=MzE2NjMyOA

Processor: Both are Intel Core 2 Duo running at 2 GHz.

Screen Size: Dell 15.4"; Mac 13"

RAM: Dell 4GB DDR2; Mac 2GB DDR2

Hard Drive: Dell 320 GB at 5400 RPM; Mac 120 GB at 5400 RPM

'Nuf said. :)

exactly. you can talk about the OS all you want, but the actual HARDWARE SPECS are undisputible
 
Given the state of the economy, it's a better angle to be playing up than trying to sell people an overpriced Windows 7 upgrade or several-hundred-dollar Office suite. Also not as bizarre as those aborted Seinfield ads.

That said, it smells an awful lot like desperation. Also, explicitly saying that your products (or those running your OS, technically) aren't as cool as the competition seems like a really, really stupid thing to be touting.

Yes, it's obviously trying to paint the Mac as elitist or somesuch, but I don't think that's not the way to go about it.

There's also the "preaching to the choir" issue--the people with a $1000 budget for a 17" laptop weren't going to be buying from Apple anyway, so I'm not sure what they're actually getting with this ad.
 
A Dell Laptop at $700:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9166564&type=product&id=1218041148773

The $1000 Macbook:

http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB881LL/A?mco=MzE2NjMyOA

Processor: Both are Intel Core 2 Duo running at 2 GHz.

Screen Size: Dell 15.4"; Mac 13"

RAM: Dell 4GB DDR2; Mac 2GB DDR2

Hard Drive: Dell 320 GB at 5400 RPM; Mac 120 GB at 5400 RPM

'Nuf said. :)

The display will show the exam same as they are the same resolution.

I would rather have 1280x800 in 13" and 5lbs than 15.4" and 6.4 lbs.
 
Perhaps Mac could simply show a breakdown:

$1000 for a mac

or

$500 for a PC
+$500 in IT service costs the third month


+ $500 in IT service costs the sixth month
+ $500 in IT service costs the eight month
+...

But hey, you can say you got a computer, so I guess that's something.
 
This post highlights the likely effectiveness that these ads will have on consumers. No die-hards or tech-heads will be converted, but the average consumer will likely find something in the ad that resonates with them.

I'm sure of this, which is why i think this is MS first effective ad in quite a while.
 
Wait... since when did a messaging application on a PC cost money?

Since never.
I was actually quite appalled when I got my Macbook at the number of Mac 3rd party apps that have the gall to charge you for them, when equivalent PC apps have been free for years.

Even the open source community dont really seem to care about an OSX port, but check over on MacUpdate, and pretty much every single app costs money, even for the most basic software like an audio/video transcoder.
 
Diapers?

Am I seeing this right? They are telling you to buy diapers with the HP laptop? Why is that? Because the HP laptop will crap out all time? :D

Also, MS should be careful with this kind of ad, because they are basically positioning a typical PC you can buy at Best Crap as the bottom of the barrel. If people follow this logic (get the cheapest machine you can find) they will reach the conclusion that they should ditch windows and get a $300 netbook with a Linux flavor of some sort...

I like the comment she makes at one point: "I am not cool enough to buy a Mac". Ouch!
 
Since never.
I was actually quite appalled when I got my Macbook at the number of Mac 3rd party apps that have the gall to charge you for them, when equivalent PC apps have been free for years.

Even the open source community dont really seem to care about an OSX port, but check over on MacUpdate, and pretty much every single app costs money, even for the most basic software like an audio/video transcoder.

Since when is that Apple's fault? Macs come with lots of free software installed on them that you have to pay for on PCs.
 
Yeah, this ad didn't work out. Okay, here's my take. Microsoft is advertising "price" rather than overall experience. It's cheezy and says nothing about the customer more than, "Hey I'm a cheapskate ". What's not being "cool enough" have to do with not finding a Mac in her price range? Stupid. I actually like the MS ad with the little 4 year old asian girl that edits pics on her PC and emails them to her parents. It's not only cute but it sells the experience, although not a true reality when it comes to using a PC and Windows.

This is exactly what Apple does in their ads is sell the experience and that's exactly what you get when you buy a Mac or any Apple product is a good experience.
"Good selling" is when you sell the experience and not the price. If you sell on price alone your customer will most likely return the product. "Oh, you didn't tell me it would overheat!", "You didn't tell me the keyboard flexes more than others!" "You didn't tell me my son couldn't play Crisis on this $699 17"!", "You didn't tell me the screen washes out while watching DVD movies". "You didn't tell me that the fans would be noisy while I'm in class".

It doesn't make any difference if the economy is in a recession, people are still buying expensive goods, cars, going to the movies, going on trips so not everybody is a "cheapskate ".

One last thing, this ad represents a falsehood. Microsoft seems to have a deal with HP as they advertise only this company's PC's. What if someone prefers a Sony or Alienware PC, they won't get out the door with a 17" for $699.
 
Definitely a good move for Microsoft to target Apple's foolish pricing. Hopefully Apple will review things as a result of this.

I bought the Mac Pro in Feb 2008 (2.8GHz 8-core) and the current models are TERRIBLE value for money in comparison, and yet the economic climate should warrant the opposite to be true.
 
Photographers, DJ, etc. Anyone who need the screen real estate.

In other words, professionals who need a big-screen laptop for work.

If the laptop's vital for your work, you're not going to care too much about the price. You're going to get a fast, reliable model. Preferably with an on-site service contract.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.