Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
it'd be cool if they had a loop-tube system of some sort that runs to take people quickly from one side of the circle to another.

I like that the parking garage forces the employee's to walk. Most multinational corporations just put the garage underneath.
 
"The concept of the building," said Oppenheimer, "is collaboration and fluidity. It'll provide a very open-spaced system, so that at one point in the day you may be in offices on one side of the circle and find yourself on the other side later that day."

I had to laugh when I read this. From recent publicity, it seems that this is the exact opposite of how things work at Apple, where most projects are locked-down, compartmentalized and highly secretive.

True, I thought the original idea of the circle was so that people who needed to be near each other, could be, but that it otherwise kept everything compartmentalized because of all the security you have to go through for each segment.

If I remember correctly there is a park included in the plans, it would be cool if it's open to the public.

A major objection by residents to Apple merging their land and the 100 acres they bought from HP, is that people were using to jogging/walking around HP's former campus park. Now that road between the two areas will disappear and the pathways become Apple's private property with no access.

Funny how the Curpertino council is taking so long to vote and approve lol.. really!? This is probably the best thing that ever happened to that city.

Wherever Google builds an office, they give out free WiFi to the nearby residents.

To celebrate their Austin expansion, Samsung gives a million dollars to the local UNICEF so that troubled kids can get help and an education.

In Cupertino, Apple refused to offer WiFi, and insists upon keeping their deal where the city has to refund half of what Apple pays in sales taxes each year. To the city, that's a loss of six million dollars, which is chump change to Apple.

For that matter, Apple pays no revenue taxes to Cupertino or California, since they funnel all that through a shell corporation in Reno Nevada. (Granted, many California based companies do the same.)

Apple also has made it clear in the past couple of years that they want their employees to stick around campus for lunch, instead of leaving to patronize local restaurants.

So yes and no. HP used to be the major employer in town, and they left. So Cupertino is wary of being dependent on any single company.
 
Does the new Apple headquaters contain just offices or does it contain a data center? Or both?
Because I doubt solar panels alone will provide enough power for a "datacenter". Perhaps they're for cosmetics. Something that looks good, but doesn't really do much.
 
Why does everything have to benefit shareholders?

Because that's what businesses do. When they stop doing that, they stop getting investment, they stop making products, they stop getting revenue and eventually go out of business.

Plus what a couple others say more eloquently: They own the company.


----------

I hope this building isn't Apple jumping over a shark made of hubris.

That was actually the very first thought I had when this was unveiled.
 
Last edited:
Does the new Apple headquaters contain just offices or does it contain a data center? Or both?
Because I doubt solar panels alone will provide enough power for a "datacenter". Perhaps they're for cosmetics. Something that looks good, but doesn't really do much.

It won't have a public datacenter (that is, none of http://*.apple.com will be served from the spaceship).

Software engineering and hardware engineering facilities have lots of computers though, and the servers will be installed in datacenter-like rooms. In my company's (pure software) main office there are three 20,000 square foot raised floor computer rooms, and about a dozen 2,000 square foot departmental computer rooms.

Apple is also putting in a large fuel-cell installation to "burn" natural gas for electricity. http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/03/31/1969051/apple-plans-nations-biggest-private.html
 
the multibillion overcharge consists of the aggregate of all those 'small' expenses I noted.

I like the building, and I'm in favor of building it. But is not true that the expense is almost all an accumulation of standard high end, or extra high end expenses. A lot of the cost is unusual and even experimental materials and construction practices. Now, I'm in favor of all that because Apple can afford it, can benefit from it, and is doing what amounts to basic research for buildings to follow. But there's more going on here than just a really fancy building. The same is often true of monumental public works like major bridges, airports, etc.
 
I think TallManNY has already solved what should go in the middle :)

View attachment 440376

Seriously, I can't believe they didn't put a Home button app-icon shaped reflecting pool in there!

Hey, there is still plenty of time to change the plans a bit. Especially on something that isn't structural. Maybe just a few trees in a square formation to be the app-icon.

----------

Does the new Apple headquaters contain just offices or does it contain a data center? Or both?
Because I doubt solar panels alone will provide enough power for a "datacenter". Perhaps they're for cosmetics. Something that looks good, but doesn't really do much.

It is just offices and enough server support for Apple's internal use. It doesn't contain anything like a data center for apple's customers. Despite that fact that this is huge, this is going to be high end real estate. They aren't going to put servers in fancy offices in a high rent district.
 
Hey, there is still plenty of time to change the plans a bit. Especially on something that isn't structural. Maybe just a few trees in a square formation to be the app-icon.

Imagine the free advertising if their HQ looked as you suggested, like a Home button, when seen from Google satellite imagery or even passing airliners.

The other poster's suggestion about the building being apple shaped was pretty good, too.
 
Any way you look a it, even if you don't like the shape, as a whole, it's going to be a gorgeous campus. I'm assuming no parts of the campus are open to non-employees? Like a park for locals to visit?
 
Could he/she/they have simulated an even shallower DOF for some of these photos?

The thing is already a miniature, now let's go all fake DOF on it ...
 
That model alone must have cost a couple of thousand dollars to make! :D

That is a very conservative estimate. Scale architecture models like that of that size and details easily hit $10K in cost. The amount of detail they have in there with the small people models, trees, cars and curved structures tell me the model firms bill to Apple was at least $15K to make that.

If it has lighting for dawn, day, dusk, night perspectives where the model's room lighting is controlled along with the embedded fiber optic lighting in the model, you are talking around $25K. Expect this to be in a visitor's lobby or the inevitable Steve Jobs / Apple museum in a few years.
 
Imagine the free advertising if their HQ looked as you suggested, like a Home button, when seen from Google satellite imagery or even passing airliners.

The other poster's suggestion about the building being apple shaped was pretty good, too.

My fav on that is flying over Intel HQ in Santa Clara. They have a huge "Intel Inside" logo on their roof. One of the better double entendre's seen in a while.
 
I still don't see how any of this is beneficial from a shareholder perspective.

Putting more employees in a single location is expected to increase communication and collaboration.

----------

I am surprised about the parking, I would have thought they would only allow public transport such as trains to access the campus. This would be the "green" thing to do anyway...

Trains? In Cupertino?
 
I also don't understand the point of a large, circular building. Looks cool, but it's so impractical.

Looking cool is the point. The world's coolest company needs to have the world's coolest HQ. It's corporate branding.

----------

Expect this to be in a visitor's lobby or the inevitable Steve Jobs / Apple museum in a few years.

Actually there will be a shrine to Steve at the exact center of the circle. When you leave offerings there, you are rewarded with a recording of Steve's voice saying "this is complete s***." :D
 
Last edited:
To celebrate their Austin expansion, Samsung gives a million dollars to the local UNICEF so that troubled kids can get help and an education.

UNICEF doesn't provide services in Austin. It provides immunization, education, health care, nutrition, clean water and sanitation to children in developing nations.
 
UNICEF doesn't provide services in Austin. It provides immunization, education, health care, nutrition, clean water and sanitation to children in developing nations.

Thank you, you're correct of course. I mixed up UNICEF and the United Way.

Samsung contributed to the Austin United Way to help local kids.

They also are contributors to UNICEF both monetarily and with expertise. For example, Samsung helped with solar panel equipped portable computer classroom trucks for children and adults in places like India and Africa.
 
True, I thought the original idea of the circle was so that people who needed to be near each other, could be, but that it otherwise kept everything compartmentalized because of all the security you have to go through for each segment.



A major objection by residents to Apple merging their land and the 100 acres they bought from HP, is that people were using to jogging/walking around HP's former campus park. Now that road between the two areas will disappear and the pathways become Apple's private property with no access.



Wherever Google builds an office, they give out free WiFi to the nearby residents.

To celebrate their Austin expansion, Samsung gives a million dollars to the local UNICEF so that troubled kids can get help and an education.

In Cupertino, Apple refused to offer WiFi, and insists upon keeping their deal where the city has to refund half of what Apple pays in sales taxes each year. To the city, that's a loss of six million dollars, which is chump change to Apple.

For that matter, Apple pays no revenue taxes to Cupertino or California, since they funnel all that through a shell corporation in Reno Nevada. (Granted, many California based companies do the same.)

Apple also has made it clear in the past couple of years that they want their employees to stick around campus for lunch, instead of leaving to patronize local restaurants.

So yes and no. HP used to be the major employer in town, and they left. So Cupertino is wary of being dependent on any single company.

Why exactly should Apple provide free wifi to anyone other than the employees inside its building? I wasn't aware corporations were obligated to to that. I can tell you the Fortune 50 company I work for doesn't do it.

And just curious what your source is for Apple not wanting employees to leave the campus for lunch. Have employees who work there told you that? Also, I thought one of Google's perks was free food for employees so I would imagine then not many Google employees are patronizing local restaurants either. I know I wouldn't leave and pay for lunch if someone was offering it to me for free. :)

----------

Does the new Apple headquaters contain just offices or does it contain a data center? Or both?
Because I doubt solar panels alone will provide enough power for a "datacenter". Perhaps they're for cosmetics. Something that looks good, but doesn't really do much.

I believe this new building is supposed to be R&D. I wonder then is the 1 infinite loop location still the main headquarters where all the executives are.
 
Why exactly should Apple provide free wifi to anyone other than the employees inside its building? I wasn't aware corporations were obligated to to that. I can tell you the Fortune 50 company I work for doesn't do it.

No one said they had to provide free WiFi. Nor even that they are "required" to be good corporate citizens like many top Fortune companies which are involved in charities and projects in their home cities... although most people think that's a good idea.

The question was: why shouldn't Cupertino be overjoyed to have them? One answer is, why should they? Do they host parks for the public? Do they contribute extra to the community? No, they lock down their territory and haggle over a million dollars in tax refunds.

Remember when Jobs first presented the plan to the town council? Remember the mayor pitifully asking about WiFi downtown in return? She must've been wishing that Google had bought the old HP land instead.

And just curious what your source is for Apple not wanting employees to leave the campus for lunch. Have employees who work there told you that?

No sir, it was news that was covered here last year when Apple started building cafeterias to keep the employees in the more outlying buildings from going off campus.
 
Thank you, you're correct of course. I mixed up UNICEF and the United Way.

Samsung contributed to the Austin United Way to help local kids.

When United Way drops the Boy Scouts of America from their benefit list I'll send them money again. Until then, "United Way" equals "No Way".

I'm disappointed that Samsung supports the United Way, and have sent them feedback on that. One voice probably won't matter, but if enough voices say "don't support hate" it could.
 
Last edited:
The Evoluon, built by Philips in the sixties in Eindhoven, Netherlands

41534099.jpg
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.