Very unlikely. I'm thinking it is more likely is it was just as cheap for the manufacturer to provide 12 GB chips than 8 GB chips in that specific situation.
Very unlikely. I'm thinking it is more likely is it was just as cheap for the manufacturer to provide 12 GB chips than 8 GB chips in that specific situation.
But copying something stores it in RAM. Since it's not written to 'disk' (SSD), it needs to be kept 'alive'. As far as I know, that requires power. It may very well be negligible, but still needing more power than writing (and retrieving) from te SSD.
I'd really appreciate if you, or anyone really, can educate me on this old perception of mine.