I'd like to see the reverse. Give them the complete AppleTV treatment. Tiny $99 black boxes, no onboard storage. Put a bunch of USB ports on the back, all compatible with external hard drives or printers. Kill the Airport Extreme (or Time Capsule, depending on which name Apple wishes to keep.)
What if they used Thunderbolt instead of (or along with) USB? Or maybe TB enabled units would be an option?
For strictly wireless access, TB doesn't make much sense over USB. More expensive, less options, wireless speeds won't let you take advantage of TB's throughput. But... if you had some systems hooked up via gigabyte ethernet, having a TB attached HDD would make sense.
If download caching was being built in, imagine how fast an update would appear when wired into the TC/AE?
Next week is going to be very interesting indeed, eh?
This could be big.
I know at least one person who considered an iPad as her only computer at home but she gave up on that idea because of the need to sync it with a full computer.
If a time-capsule really could sync/update/backup an iPad then I can think of 3 or 4 people I'd suggest an 'iPad-Time Capsule-Bluetooth Keyboard-Apple TV' home system to. *
As iOS grows there will be more and more people who fit that profile.
* These are people who currently own a single Macbook and only use 1/10th of its potential. So yes, that sort of customer does exist.
I think you are onto something here. I think this is Jobs real dream. That for many many people, an Apple iPad and an Apple "device" that attaches your iPad to the internet is all the computing power you need. Then you just need external storage for all the Apple provided content you are going to buy. I give your comment 3 thumbs up!!