I can't believe everyone here is acting as is the new Time Capsule will have local storage. A couple million iTunes songs does not a 500,000 sq. ft. data center make.
I can't believe everyone here is acting as is the new Time Capsule will have local storage. A couple million iTunes songs does not a 500,000 sq. ft. data center make.
The current AE has a single USB port, and obviously has no A5 processor w/ iOS. Also, it is not aggressively priced like the AppleTV. And as gramirez says, I don't think Apple officially supports time machine over Air Disk.
But you're right, what I described is more similar to a current AE than TC.
This could be big.
I know at least one person who considered an iPad as her only computer at home but she gave up on that idea because of the need to sync it with a full computer.
If a time-capsule really could sync/update/backup an iPad then I can think of 3 or 4 people I'd suggest an 'iPad-Time Capsule-Bluetooth Keyboard-Apple TV' home system to. *
As iOS grows there will be more and more people who fit that profile.
* These are people who currently own a single Macbook and only use 1/10th of its potential. So yes, that sort of customer does exist.
Without local storage, whats the point of a Time Capsule?
Is this what youre advocating?
iOS Device/Mac <Time Capsule> iCloud Servers
All iCloud services (what we think they will be) can be done without intermediary HW.
The answer is speed. A Time-Machine Backup of 20GB data takes 10 minutes to a local disk; 30 minutes to a local networked disk (TimeCapsule); 10 hours over the internet (iCloud). Are you gonna wait 10 hours for a backup to complete ? (yes I know, but FiOS is not available where I live).
Another problem is the streaming. I am not willing to keep my MacPro running; so my wife can watch TV. If the TC is running iOS it can act as iTunes (=server) and the aTV can stream from it. That's all I really need.
I can't believe everyone here is acting as is the new Time Capsule will have local storage. A couple million iTunes songs does not a 500,000 sq. ft. data center make.
So where does ones iTunes library get backed up to if it resides on the TimeCapsule?
Me for one, right underneath my TV in the same rack.
Wireless synching makes sense, this bodes well against the conversation I overheard, but didn't take too seriously at the time. It would be an extension to the wireless activation piece.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1089193/
Phil
Can anyone list any good reasons to move to iOS from NetBSD for a freaking router?!? It does however already use an ARM processor.
Is the guy behind the Airport products still at Apple? (I can't recall his name - but I seem to remember that he left Apple last year)
if apple can pull off the marketing, it would be great to mergeTV into the Airport Express Line..
1. Airport Express (router only)
2. Airport Express withTV
3. Airport Express withTV + Time Capsule(500GB, 2TB, 3TB) called the Apple TV Personal Cloud Edition
.
Not everyone here is in love with the iCloud concept as a complete replacement for local storage. The one big benefit would be a truly remote backup, but Apple could give us local TC2 with the option to mirror our time machine backups to the iCloud if we want that benefit.
A pure iCloud-only option has all kinds of issues, but the biggest one (IMO) is the controllers of the pipes that connect us to the iCloud are striving to pinch down our broadband use through tiers, caps and pricing while this iCloud concept is encouraging even more broadband usage. That's not going to end well if we like to keep as much money as we can in our pockets, yet we want to store and stream everything in the iCloud.
And let the iPads / iPhones / MacBooks just act as a remote to stream to TV / Speakers!!!!
(minimizes bw usage too!!)
Not a "real" fan of clouding "everything"....
PLEASE!!!!!![]()
the Cloud is gonna take over the internet...