Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think this thing is completely overblown. You have to set up a GROUP FaceTime call then PURPOSELY add your own number. And this only lasts as long as it takes for the other party to pick up the call or for the call to go to voicemail. This is TOTALLY overblown.

You completely misunderstood it. You don't have to add yourself. The person eavesdropping has to add themselves, and you don't know about it. And they can even see your video. Let's say your phone is ringing, and you press the power button to make the call go away, and your camera turns on, and the other person can see everything. You don't notice that, because your screen is off, and you think you've cancelled the call. You could be straight out of the shower naked, and the camera is silently on.
 
I think this thing is completely overblown. You have to set up a GROUP FaceTime call then PURPOSELY add your own number. And this only lasts as long as it takes for the other party to pick up the call or for the call to go to voicemail. This is TOTALLY overblown.

What you think might be more interesting if you based your opinion on the facts. YOU don’t have to add yourself. The caller/bad actor has to add himself. And FaceTime doesn’t go to voicemail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pat500000
I think this thing is completely overblown. You have to set up a GROUP FaceTime call then PURPOSELY add your own number. And this only lasts as long as it takes for the other party to pick up the call or for the call to go to voicemail. This is TOTALLY overblown.

My friends that I tried this with said they could not pick up the call. I was listening to them until I turned my phone off...
 
Jailed? Seriously, jailed? On what actual charges?

Upsetting an Apple troll, apparently.

I’m disappointed in Apple, and this was handled badly. But this is a screwup, not a sinister plot. It is in no way comparable to what Google and FB are intentionally doing to invade users’ privacy to harvest even more data. Apple is no saint, but does not deserve to be tarred with same brush about this issue.
 
Andrew Cuomo is furious! “Let me make this damn clear: no one violates the privacy of the citizens of the great state of New York except me!”
 
$20 Billion profit and a bug. The vultures are circling.

It always makes me feel better, as a software engineer, when someone like Apple f's up like this. Reminds me that even the guys at the top of their game are capable of howlers like this one too.
Used to have a manager shout "You don't see the big guys having these issues!!!". I have sent him email after email to his personal, work and the group dev account every time so major bug occurs. Amazon has gone down, Rackspace has failed, I tried ordering from Staples and the Cart page gave me a JAVA exception! and it never ends.

Btw, I got a fake C&D that the manager created stating I will be sue if I continue to email the group account (he's blocked me from all the other accounts)
[doublepost=1548893716][/doublepost]
Investigating over a software bug?
They should investigate all the medical software out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flipzide
Look at your alternatives.

At least Apple tries to keep your data safe yours, private, and secure. Mistakes happen.

Look at Google and Facebook. They have no shame in collecting your data, with or without your knowledge. The difference is, Apple didn't do this on purpose. I still think someone should be fired at Apple for this, but it's not company policy to record what you do as it is with Android.

Basically, Apple is the best we have for privacy and security...and it isn't close, mistakes and all.

Apple was only about privacy because it didn't affect their bottom line, as they transition from a hardware company to a services company see how quickly their stance will change regarding privacy and data collection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Apple was only about privacy because it didn't affect their bottom line, as they transition from a hardware company to a services company see how quickly their stance will change regarding privacy and data collection.
Not sure that logic follows or we've seen evidence of that. I don't think Apple has to bend on privacy to make their services model work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Let them investigate. What will they find? That's it's a bug and Apple dealt with the situation quickly with a patch to follow?
wait...Apple must be guilty......you have said numerous times here on MR if a company is being investigated...they are guilty or else they wouldn't be investigated. Haven't you said that about other companies? Why is it different for Apple?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
I'd argue about NY times to reported "failure" on the Facetime bug... Apple knew about it only recently.
 
Last edited:
Apple’s crediability of privacy have been shot down. Everyone who owns ios devices may not know about this...but then..word of mouth is fast. If apple keeps talking about securitt...he will less likely to be taken seriously.
 
wait...Apple must be guilty......you have said numerous times here on MR if a company is being investigated...they are guilty or else they wouldn't be investigated. Haven't you said that about other companies? Why is it different for Apple?
Yeah, Apple is guilty. Of releasing a bug. What is NY State going to find? That Apple did that maliciously with the objective of incorporating a backdoor that blew up in their faces? Much different than the anti-trust (sic) investigations of Qualcomm, of which there may be a reasonable premise to the investigation.
 
Yeah, Apple is guilty. Of releasing a bug. What is NY State going to find? That Apple did that maliciously with the objective of incorporating a backdoor that blew up in their faces? Much different than the anti-trust (sic) investigations of Qualcomm, of which there may be a reasonable premise to the investigation.

Can you imagine if Apple purposely did this ? That would be like the NSA going 180 degrees in "protecting the contrary"
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Yeah, Apple is guilty. Of releasing a bug. What is NY State going to find? That Apple did that maliciously with the objective of incorporating a backdoor that blew up in their faces? Much different than the anti-trust (sic) investigations of Qualcomm, of which there may be a reasonable premise to the investigation.
Now ...you're back tracking...Wasn't Apple under investigation by the same agencies though? The DOJ....SEC.... numerous times....
Don't you presume Apple innocent until proven guilty...but then when Apple has a conflict with Qualcomm...you say Qualcomm must be guilty simply because they are under investigation.

Seems like your brand favoritism gets in the way of equal treatment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Now ...you're back tracking...Wasn't Apple under investigation by the same agencies though? The DOJ....SEC.... numerous times....
Don't you presume Apple innocent until proven guilty...but then when Apple has a conflict with Qualcomm...you say Qualcomm must be guilty simply because they are under investigation.

Seems like your brand favoritism gets in the way of equal treatment.
The prior post was a restatement of a previous post in different language. There is also quite a difference between New York State "investigating" vs the SEC or some other governmental regulatory agency.

They should investigate Apple, probably to find out how this happened. If the testimony is not sealed.

But if I did say what you state with certainty, you should be able to show the post, where I was so definitive. (As opposed to stating an opinion)

Qualcomm is being investigated across the globe. The point is there must be some merit to these investigations, which is quite different from saying they are guilty of the alleged corporate behaviors. Again, I challenge you to find the post where anything more than an opinion was stated.
 
It's as if elected officials all think that they've been granted summa potestas. :rolleyes: Sorry fellas, but no one is above the law. No one.
Our government has a very different opinion about that. They think that they are not just above the law, they are the law.
 
Last edited:
Tim Cooks response:

national-bologna-day-funny.jpg

[doublepost=1548908741][/doublepost]
Too late, Apple. I've already switched to Android where I know my personal information is kept safe!

;):p
On a positive note at least people will realize they have more phone choices. You can’t trust both apple or android so you might as well get the phone you prefer if you’re damned either way.
 
Last edited:
But if I did say what you state with certainty, you should be able to show the post, where I was so definitive. (As opposed to stating an opinion)

Qualcomm is being investigated across the globe. The point is there must be some merit to these investigations, which is quite different from saying they are guilty of the alleged corporate behaviors. Again, I challenge you to find the post where anything more than an opinion was stated.

Here is the link and quote.
but Qualcomm seems to be doing business in such a way they have various regulatory bodies in multiple countries investigating them. Must be something to it.
https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...for-2019-iphones.2164794/page-4#post-26999753

Just Google how many times Apple has been under investigation worldwide.... Tax evasion...to planned obsolescence to unfair business practices...products being banned from patent infringement
So there must be something to it all. If we apply the same conclusion to all fairly.....
Again....your brand loyalty seems to always give Apple the benefit of the doubt but not others.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.