I cry "BS". The next iMac is under the same tight wraps as the iPhone was and only those who don't talk have seen it. Sure it's probably in the design-phase but I feel this was just way for Apple Insider to generate some decent web traffic. That's it.
iPod Nanos anyone?Please stop with the "Bring back the G4 iMac design".
It will not happen. Apple will never take a step back. There may be elements that get incorporated into the new design...like adjustable screen height and tilt, but the old design will never come back. It was too expensive to produce...period.
Don't get me wrong, I had no problem with the G4 iMac, but I have no problem with the current design either.
Why do people want to go back? I am excited to see what NEW things Apple has to offer.
iPod Nanos anyone?
Despite the fact that this mockup is for the Mac Pro, I would kill for the new iMacs to look like this.
Why?
Brushed metal wears better; Looks nice;
Whats not to like?
You are the actual Adam that created that work of art - WOW? 😱 Stunning!http://www.kromekat.nildram.co.uk/imac.html
If it looks like this, I'll be wanting royalties Steve! 😉
Adam
This mockup was floated last pre-refresh last year and I was looking all over for it this time because I still think this is how the next iMac should look, especially if it's an "Industrial Design". I love this design a lot. Thank you Mac Fly for finding this. 🙂
Hey, here's a thought, and sorry for the double post - a while ago some site mentioned that Apple patented the possibility of touch-sensitive metal around the border of a device - so, for instance, you could slide your finger along the edge of an ipod to scroll. It looks like that got discarded in favor of multitouch in the iPhone. However, what if they put that tech to use in the iMac? You could control brightness or volume with the sides and top of a screen, or program them to respond to Spaces automatically (slide your finger in a particular direction to move to that Space), or any number of things. It'd probably be a lot cheaper to implement than multitouch hardware, but might still be quite useful.
So does 'third review' actually mean there have been four critiques? It's so prescriptivist to insist on outdated and overliteral notions of words. Common usage is that when someone refers to the first revision, they're referring to the first generation. The "vision" of the product, you could say, is the prototype phase.Well, actually, the post on MR front page talks about "major iMac design revision", which does not discuss generations of the product. Further, the word revision means to have "reconsidered and made changes to", so the first model is not the first revision. There have been three (significantly) different iMac designs: the original, the first revision, and the second revision. So, yes, the front page article should say '3rd', not '4th'.
I think it's a terrifying design. The imbalanced black in the four corners, the odd curves that are too soft for a device of its size, the mismatched speaker grilles, and Frankenstein stand are all arbitrary elements. I get that it's supposed to evoke 'iPhone' but it's possible to do that in a sensible and artful way.This looks like an HP in sheeps clothing to me. Too much fuss over a pair of speakers.
My friend who works at Apple HQ took this pic of the new iMac on his mobile phone"
...
Apparently the graphics card is replacable.
I would also really like to see a return to the older arm and a potrait swivel option.
That's just about exactly what I do think will happen. But I think of it as a computer with multitouch thrown in for (almost) free. I think that the new line of displays will have multitouch as well - that's why they've been delayed so long!For all you fools expecting the imac to suddenly become a half-price widescreen wacom cintiq with a computer thrown in for free, i suggest you take pause.
Mike from myallo.comThat's not quite right - Revs A - D were all tray loading. I had a lime Rev D, which was a tray-loading 333Mhz G3. Slot-loading began with Rev E, and then there were the DV, DV+, DV/SE versions before the iMac G4 (lamp) was introduced.I consider:
Rev A & B to be the same = 1st design (tray load)
Rev C = 2nd design (slot load)
Rev D = 3rd design (dome)
Rev E = 4th design (slab)
Rev F = 5th design = which does actually equal #5