I'd like to see some new MB and MBP designs pleeeeaaaaaase.![]()
The screen could be really thin, and the manoeuvrability of it would be great for optional-touch...imagine using a keyboard and mouse, then just pulling the screen towards you for touch sensitivity...Why would Apple go back to the lamp-design? Ok, almost everyone loved it, but they want sleeker, thinner, better NOT bulkier, heavier...
IF the design changes, it won't be much. Less chin, as has been posted here already, maybe a bit thinner... maybe aluminum or a black version... time will tell.
I am confused...
Why would Apple go back to the lamp-design? Ok, almost everyone loved it, but they want sleeker, thinner, better NOT bulkier, heavier...
IF the design changes, it won't be much. Less chin, as has been posted here already, maybe a bit thinner... maybe aluminum or a black version... time will tell.
i bought one like 3 or 4 months ago and i love it...
but they have to find a new cooling solution in order to make it able to hold better graphic cards and cpus...
that is the only thing that sucks... i`d like a 8800 gtx in my iMac `cause i like to play 3d games. but you can`t i guess because they are way too hot with around 70-80 degrees celsius.
but few things i`d like to see in future iMacs:
1) the ability to use it as a monitor for other devices like a mac pro or even a pc!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2) black design
3) 360° stand
4) even more inputs on the back (firewire 800, s-ata, s-video, hdmi)
5) monitor off button![]()
The screen could be really thin, and the manoeuvrability of it would be great for optional-touch...imagine using a keyboard and mouse, then just pulling the screen towards you for touch sensitivity...
Yeah, I think this is probably closest to how it'll look (color-wise and with the chrome trim, though that'll be thinner and I don't expect it to have speakers on the front of the machine like that). Make those slight changes and it'd make for a seriously elegant design, consistent with the look of the iPhone, and it looks a hell of a lot nicer than that fugly translucent futuristic screen design that people keep posting.
Chrome? No............ NO!
Too 1980![]()
Or maybe it will look like this:
![]()
A combination of multi-touch and desktop![]()
That looks good, just out of curiosity do the current iMacs have a powerbrick.
Just move the power brick and superdrive to the bottom stand. And add a battery to the monitor. We are all set to go. Lightweight laptop + powerful desktop all in one. A true one computer dream![]()
Just move the power brick and superdrive to the bottom stand. And add a battery to the monitor. We are all set to go. Lightweight laptop + powerful desktop all in one. A true one computer dream![]()
If you want a gaming machine, why the hell are you looking at Macs anyway? Macs have never been all that good for gaming. This is why I have a Mac and a Wii.
Can I play
- Combat Mission 1, 2, and 3
- Il-2 Sturmovik
- Half-Life 2
- Europa Universalis 3
- Civilization IV
- etc.
On a Wii? No I can not. I always get annoyed when someone says "why play games on a computer, when you can just get a console?". Maybe because the consoles do not have the games that interest me? Maybe because consoles suck for the type of games I like to play?
this coming from someone who owns a Wii.
This is so very simple to understand...& still some appear not to. Add on Boot Camp & Macs can be the perfect computer for all purposes, including gaming.
But the original comment was about getting a console for gaming instead. And those people fail to understand that while you can play games on a PC and you can play games on a console, the two are not necessarily alternatives to each other. To them, gaming is gaming, and there's no difference in console-games and computer-games. But in reality the difference between the two is substantial.