Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
CapturedDarknes said:
Like most people's comments, the thinness can't really get any better. I couldn't care less about quad-core, as a user said, most people don't use it anyway. Maybe an option for those who are so inclined to have one. As for the display, I would love it to match the current look of the LED display, and maybe it should have that shiny new display port they came out with along the UB MBP's.

Nobody is using quad-core? Quads are really made for multi-tasking/multi-processing, but now that Snow Leopard is out and have Grandcentral, even a single program can reap benefits with a quadcore chip, doubling the power / speed of a dual core machine. So everybody will use it
 
Im not sure we should put more into BR movie discs or players
according to Endgaget and VIDEOBUSINESS Q1,2 sales of BR to July 1 are abysmal;
despite being pushed like crazy BR's share of the pie is still 13% BR and DVD 87% market share

Even VOD/DDL are leaving BR WAY behind

1. DVD sales to date..........................$5 Billion
2. Video on Demand/DDL sales to date: $968 million (!)
3. BR sales to date.............................$410 million

A truer pie graph would show:

1. DVD sales.........85%
2. VOD/DDL sales..11% (and this is really only just getting off the ground)
3. BR sales............4%

a ROUGH figure
Since a VOD/DDL purchase is generally a LOT less expensive that buying a BR-that means it took a MASSIVE number MORE buyers to hit that near to one billion sales figure
Now ALL optical media sales are down at about 4%
But that doesnt hurt DVD much-but it kill BR-even if sales are rising(......?)
They must be rising a LOT slower than if the economy where OK
But I think it may be too little too late

With this XMas expected to be the worst ever, and the economy dropping still
BR, already being heavily subsidized by a deeply ailing SONY, could bite the dust

When things get tougher in discretionary spending, DVD has the cushion of near a Billion already familiar-and installed players-no need for all-new equipment;
Not sure what BR share has but its probably miniscule and the nations wallets are pretty much locked shut on entertainment electronics

But the REAL death knell for BR is that the young upstart VOD sales are closing in on one billion in sales-which really came into its won in just this year;
And everyone and their brother are jumping into the VOD/DDL Market Google UToob Vuze Stars
DVD/VOD rentals far outstrip BR rentals by a lopsided 90-10%

2009MidYearOverallPie.jpg


Maybe this is why APPLE has held off on BR-then again-it would still make for excellent storage-unless an even better format is on the horizon-
or THE CLOUD

I tracked BR marketshare on Endgaget until they took that chart down March 7, for obvious reasons as BR could never hold and defend more than 13% sales per week average,
in a pie graph of only DVD and BR

http://www.videobusiness.com/info/CA6673480.html



You do realize that at this moment there are only about 300 BR titles available on the market. Compare that to well over 20,000 DVD titles that are available to rent or purchase. If you take into account that there are almost 65 different DVD titles for every 1 Blu-ray title you would understand that $410 million in sales is not bad. In fact if we were to do a simple little conversion and say that if blu-ray could double their production output to 600 titles they would be making $1 billion in sales with only 1/30th the market share. If you actually want to pretend that blu-ray is an old technology on it's way out then you don't understand the market.
 
Have there been any announcements of an event? I can't see apple completely redesigning the iMac and then not having an event to launch it. They only do that with speed bumps. But then not sure how much notice apple give for events.
 
That would be mirroring, extension was blocked on the iMac and iBook back in the day.

Sorry I wasn't clearer. The teleprompter output is not a direct mirror of the primary screen it is a "mirrored mirror" -- reversed for the on-camera teleprompter glass that reverses it again. got that? :)

I ran an available software patch to make the G4 iMac run a screen extension on the VGA output. So, technically the G4 is capable of it, but for some reason Apple chose to block it.
 
I beg to differ. The new Alienware Aurora ALX has some really cool actively-controlled louvers; kinda like the spoiler on Porsches. And what is so technically supreme? iMac uses the same hardware as everyone else. There's nothing special about it.
I'm still a bigger fan of the P180 mini. I like the monolithic feel.

I got my tower up to 3.5 GHz last night and still reasonably quiet.
 
huge hole? they have NOTHING AT ALL in the desktop line.

iMac = overpriced underpowered laptop pretending to be a desktop Agree
MacPro = workstation (this is not even close to a regular desktop tower) Agree

You forgot their "consumer desktop Mac Mini"

Although I guess one could make the claim that the Mac Mini is just a laptop without the screen keyboard or trackpad

Also I dont see it happening but what if apple introduced the 20" entry level model at or under $999 by using the fastest Atom processor, a >200GB HDD 2GB ram and the 9400M graphics? then worked up to the C2D/i5/i7 whatever they used, 4GB ram (expandable to 8) more graphics / dual graphics options and easily upgradable HDD's for the more performance desktop model.
 
If people can't see the difference in Blu-Ray, good for them. They can save the money and stick to DVD!

It sucks being able to notice the jump in quality, because now I don't want to go back. ;)


The new iMac BETTER be quad core. They would have an awesome place for an iMac running a Core i7, even if it was only the top of the line.
 
Really? That thing always reminded me of the damn Pixar lamp for some reason. I hated that one.
The ergonomics on that iMac were the best though, you could move the screen up down, swivel, tilt ... I really hat not being able to adjust the height on Apple's current displays.
 
If people can't see the difference in Blu-Ray, good for them. They can save the money and stick to DVD!
I don't want Blue-Ray simply because I don't want to pay for it because I know I won't use it. It is definitely superior to DVD though, and I can see why people would want it. Hopefully they just make it a build to order option across the entire line.
 
for those desiring a multitouch trackpad

It's rumored that Steve Job's is working on it as we text. It's going to cost somewhere between $799 and $999, which seems high. The nice thing is that when you're not using it for a multitouch trackpad, you will be able to use it like an iPhone/iPod touch.

Cool...

/snark
 
I beg to differ. The new Alienware Aurora ALX has some really cool actively-controlled louvers; kinda like the spoiler on Porsches.

If I was 15, it might be cool. Now I just want a computer to be quiet and stay out of the way. That Alienware is a beast that draws way too much attention in a room.

Motorized fins on top? Ugh.

It looks like it should have robots worshipping at it's base.

And what is so technically supreme?

The OS. ;)
 
i am ready to buy as soon as they are available...

and then pick up an apple tablet in early/mid 2010

i have been chugging along with my 07 mac mini with upgraded ram and hd but it is time to get more serious and i've been a' waiting for an imac for a while now...
 
Although I guess one could make the claim that the Mac Mini is just a laptop without the screen keyboard or trackpad

Also I dont see it happening but what if apple introduced the 20" entry level model at or under $999 by using the fastest Atom processor, a >200GB HDD 2GB ram and the 9400M graphics? then worked up to the C2D/i5/i7 whatever they used, 4GB ram (expandable to 8) more graphics / dual graphics options and easily upgradable HDD's for the more performance desktop model.

LOL a Mac Mini? currently in canada a macmini is $729, my coworker bought a full out GAMING Machine for $650 with a 4870 video Card.

how is a mac mini supposed to compare? a 9400 with shared ram? no HDMI with audio, non-upgradable (you can but you void your warranty)

also the Macmini being the greenest? BS, this is the greenest

http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS9153577198.html

even has HDMI and less than $400 for the most expensive model
 
I don't want Blue-Ray simply because I don't want to pay for it because I know I won't use it. It is definitely superior to DVD though, and I can see why people would want it. Hopefully they just make it a build to order option across the entire line.

dont want to pay for it? how much do you think it costs? laptops that are $600 have blueray drives in it. it couldnt possibly cost that much, or are you going by apple dollars?

they somehow think that 4GB of ram costs $240 << (lol from newegg it costs $50)
or that a 1TB drive costs $359 << (again, WTF 1TB drives can be had for $70)

you seriously need to open your eyes apple is just stealing every dime you make and you somehow are happy with it.
 
One thing that many people are overlooking is the fact that Arrandale is technically dual-core. Many are concerned with the fact that because the rumors point out that the next iMac is dual-core, it's going to be Peryn. So doesn't this mean that Intel could give Apple priority with CPU releases (as they have in the past), and we could see Arrandale in the next iMacs?
 
One thing that many people are overlooking is the fact that Arrandale is technically dual-core. Many are concerned with the fact that because the rumors point out that the next iMac is dual-core, it's going to be Peryn. So doesn't this mean that Intel could give Apple priority with CPU releases (as they have in the past), and we could see Arrandale in the next iMacs?
It's possible. Intel already has Arrandale in production. Apple might be getting the first batch of stock ages before anyone else.

Apple's numbers might be low enough compared to Dell/HP to get it this early.
 
With USB 3 and SATA 6 around the corner, mind you there is always something around the corner !
 
I'd be surprised if there were a Blu-ray option. The noxious hacks Microsoft had to add to Vista in order to get the Blu-ray Association's stamp of approval were well known destroyers of performance and reliability. Apple doesn't want to add those kludges to OSX.
 
imac's r too expensive!


unless they drop to $1!


i will buy.....


maybe $5


but meh>!:D;););););)


i hope they have blu-ray, and super mega LED screens! that will make me blind...;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.