If they add a faster chip and more RAM, I will definitely upgrade to the new iPhone. Otherwise, my current 3G phone works great and I will keep it.
Faster chip, more RAM = SOLD !!!
Faster chip, more RAM = SOLD !!!
So whatever they pick, it will be ONE big thing they talk about more than anything else. I'm just guessing, but I think video-recording will be it.
I thought I remember a front page story from a few days ago stating the current iPhone 3G can only handle 3.6 Mbit/s HSPA?
Electronista provides more detail on AT&T's plans for faster 3G running at 7.2 Mbps, up from the 3.6 Mbps speed of the current network.
However, the most likely change is the addition of support for speed-doubled 7.2Mbps 3G given both hardware manufacturer and carrier plans. Infineon should have a new 3G chipset starting from mid-year that would support the faster speeds while also improving battery life. At the same time, AT&T has been trialing 7.2Mbps 3G since late 2008 and should roll out the speedier service this year. The provider has stressed that many of its cell towers can be upgraded solely through software rather than new equipment.
Current iPhones are limited in hardware to 3.6Mbps 3G and couldn't themselves be upgraded.
... (off topic) and AT&T needs to reduce the fees on the older iPhone monthy data plans. For example, the Gen1 iPhone is much slower and the monthly data fee should be less than the 3G monthly data fee.
Agreed. That Marvell PXA168 ARM looks pretty sweet! Of course, I'd like to see a big storage bump, but that is a whole other story...
There was a story about that, here's an excerpt:
I'm in the DC area as well. The only carrier that actually has service in the metro is Verizon, but Sprint can roam on there as well. Neither ATT or T-Mobile work at all. This is supposed to change over the next year as WMATA is opening up the metro to service from all major carriers. A quick google search will turn up a wealth of info on this subject.I live in Washington, DC. and ride the metro train a lot. Everyone that has t-mobile, verizon, and other services still plug away on their phone with phone calls and text messages. I glance at my iphone and as soon as I walk in through the doors my reception drops.
Ummmm that isn't the only reason to include N. I'd love it if I could have my iPhones on the same wifi network as the rest of my house, but I can't because they will drag the entire network speed down to 802.11g speeds. I'm currently running two networks in my house to get around this, kind or a PITA. 802.11n is a must for the next iPhone, I don't want to keep running g hardware for no reason.Please, stop the ridiculous N WiFi rumors.
The current iPhone can't even come close to saturating a G conection. In fact, it can't even saturate a good high-speed home Internet connection.
I have 20mbit/sec (burstable to 25 mbit/sec) service from Cox. I've tested it using SpeedTest from both my PC and my MacBook (forcing connection to the G side of my router), and I am able to attain that speed.
With my iPhone connected through WiFi, the best I've been able to get is 5mbit/sec - on a good day. That's just 1/4 of my Internet connection speed. I've tried it on other's routers and had the same result. As well, other people have reported a similar maximum speed here.
N WiFi is absolutely unnecessary for the iphone. It would be a waste of money and a waste of battery power, and Apple is not that stupid.
Seriously, what the hell do you need 32GB of storage for? 16GB gives me all the music I could ever need while traveling, all my pictures that I would want to show someone, all the apps I need and plenty I use SOMETIMES, all of the podcasts I listen to and there is still 3GB left to dump a movie on there when I travel for work.
Sure I have the macbook on business trips also, but really, unless it is only a small difference in price (50 bucks?) It's not worth it... just give me a faster processor/more RAM 16GB model and cut and pa... err... nevermind.
Really? Most phones have had that functionality for years. How about iPhone MMS?Although there will be other improvements, I think "video recording" will somehow become the basis for this iPhone's name, just as 3G was the defining characteristic of the last one.
I don't know what they'll call it, but that's the feature they'll show on TV.
Seriously, what the hell do you need 32GB of storage for? 16GB gives me all the music I could ever need while traveling, all my pictures that I would want to show someone, all the apps I need and plenty I use SOMETIMES, all of the podcasts I listen to and there is still 3GB left to dump a movie on there when I travel for work.
Sure I have the macbook on business trips also, but really, unless it is only a small difference in price (50 bucks?) It's not worth it... just give me a faster processor/more RAM 16GB model and cut and pa... err... nevermind.
Seriously, what the hell do you need 32GB of storage for? 16GB gives me all the music I could ever need while traveling, all my pictures that I would want to show someone, all the apps I need and plenty I use SOMETIMES, all of the podcasts I listen to and there is still 3GB left to dump a movie on there when I travel for work.
Sure I have the macbook on business trips also, but really, unless it is only a small difference in price (50 bucks?) It's not worth it... just give me a faster processor/more RAM 16GB model and cut and pa... err... nevermind.
For me, faster processor and more RAM are paramount. For a lot of people, it's storage and gimmicks (video recording).
If the iPhone has "n" built in for wifi (unlike b/g) then it'll be a few years until I need that so I might skip it.
HSPDA would be something I would buy - more portable internet speed.
This is interesting because details on the Marvell Sheeva chip are scarce. All I know is that it is an ARM licensed core (which apple just did so they can do the cores themselves) and it can run 1+ Ghz. I don't know what functional units it incorporates, what its MIPS are, what process size the chip is, etc. If this is indeed what they use, I'll be interested to get some hard numbers.
Also,
![]()
From the product brief PDF
32 gig would be nice, I would love it if they sprang a 64 gig on us.