I know you are meant to say 32GB of RAM but man I am super curious to know how iOS runs on 32TB of RAM/Storage. Would it still be a slugfest or everything can be truly instantaneous now.I sold my M4 and was hoping for more from the M5 in particular 16GB without opting for the TB models, or 32TB for those.
I don’t use iPad as extensively as you do but I do use my iPad so much that I started forgetting to bring my iPhone while traveling outside. That’s how it goes, even though I also have a Mac and a PC to do whatever they are doing the best. I can’t afford absolutely top of the line iPad but I’ve used it well enough to make it worthwhile. My 2018 iPad Pro was plagued with problems that I opted for an upgrade to M1 iPad Pro, and man that was quite amazing. 5 years in, sure M1 is getting slow and 512GB of storage is nowhere near enough for me, but that’s roughly the cost of $1 per day too. It’s incredible. I’m seriously considering upgrading to M5 even if the change is minor compared to M4 because my keyboard case is breaking down by the day and I don’t want to buy another one that is not forward compatible, plus I need more storage.It’s a
It’s a rumor site. So I’m speculating like everyone else. But Apple usually does double the ram in the 1TB iPad Pro models, so I tend to believe the rumor that the 1TB M5 iPad Pros will get 24gb of ram while the base models will get the bump to 12gb.
I plan to buy the 1TB wifi 13” M5 iPad Pro without nano texture. If prices remain consistent with the M4 iPad Pros, that’d be $1,899. My 2018 iPad Pro has lasted me 7 years. I expect the M5 iPad Pro to last me just as long if not longer. To break that down for you, over 7 years, that’s equal to about $22 a month, or $5 a week… or only .75 cents a day! So yeah, as an artist, that is totally worth it to me. For less than the price of a cup of coffee a day, I get the best digital sketchbook on the planet. Even if i didn’t make any money with it, it’d be worth it for me. But I will probably make more with it in the first year to pay for it easily. Plus I can write it off on my taxes as a business expense. So it’s a no brainer. I also don’t own a computer anymore. The iPad Pro has replaced my laptop since 2018. So yeah, at $1,899 for a product that will last me almost a decade, it’s a real bargain. I will create thousands of art pieces with it. It will give me countless hours of enjoyment. And I will make $ with it. Not to mention that besides art, It’ll also be my main content consumption device. Movies look incredible on that OLED display. I will also surf the web on it, play games on it & write emails on it. Besides my iPhone 16 Pro Max, it’ll be my most used device for all things creative & social. Have I convinced you yet that it’s worth every penny for me? 😂
And I have a computer to deal with this. I do not need to use the iPad to do this. I appreciate that you use the iPad to do this work, but for me I need fully functional OS on a machine with a mouse and 2 X 27” 5K displays. Each to his own and if you chose to use an iPad good luck. But for me it is a complete waste of time.As an example : on my M1 iPad pro, I had to deal with a mosaic of the moon that is approximately 100MP. The PNG is more than 350MB. And Photomator really struggled with the file.
Maybe but why? I have a computer to do this work not a half baked OS on a small screen. Again this is my perspective and I really do not see the iPad as serious computing platform.Maybe processor update is to make it more power efficient and faster comes as a bonus?
What can they do for users in Russia though? In US or other western countries maybe something can be done, but Russia? Nah. Besides, they might have the tech to activate an Apple device offline.Are these guys that stupid to think that Apple doesn't know the location and people that have activated 'unreleased' devices?
Fair comment. But I don’t see iPads as a competitor to a machine using Mac OS. They are different machines for different purposes. And to make it clear an iPad to me is not a tool I would use for some of the tasks I see other people see as part or the iPad’s remit. Its OS is too clumsy and the interface is completely useless to me. Good luck to you but the majority of people I see using an iPad ae content consumers but I am also aware the some people use them for serious work. Good luck and my post reflects my view and mine alone. I suspect I am surprised that Apple have so many power users that they feel an M5 is a valid update given the reaction to the M4 release.But it’s the same with Macs. There is a spectrum, and on one end, there will be people who take full advantage of powerful Macs, while on the other, it simply means a slightly faster and longer-lasting machine. Same with iPads.
The difference with the iPad is that some people seem to be mad and want to publicly announce that they don’t have any skill/job/hobby that requires a powerful iPad. Which is okey. But I don’t see power iPad users saying that a maxed out MBP is useless because they don’t use Xcode or FCP.
An amazing number of people do not like my post here, which is interesting since I made the point that for me it was a personal view that I am not going to change. However I think the point being made here by the 'disagree' crowd is that these 'disagree' people think that there IS a good reasons to upgrade the processor and working RAM. Good luck to you and I am glad you have a use for it, I just made the point that I do not see the point and that Apple must have seen something I do not. For me the iPad is, and will remain for the forseeable future, a device for consumption. I can see that maybe Apple Intelligence may require more RAM and processor capability but at the moment that is a totally unrealized target.Just what we need, even faster and probably more expensive iPads. I am not sure what people are doing, in general, with their iPads, but making them faster is not even on my radar for my use. But, I suppose, there must be people that need it or Apple would not have seen reason to do it. Must be the desire to run everything on one type of processor only and eliminate the need to make two types of M chip is the only reason I can deduce. Meanwhile, for me, my M1 powered iPads are more than fast enough. But that is me.
3000 for 7 years is about 430 a year, not bad i would say, and I bet that iPad is still going strong and would may be passed down and live another 2-3 years so a good investment in the long run.You’re really trying to spend like $3K on a iPad? I hope you sell your art cause dang.
M5 chip is a given. The increase in RAM to 12GB is very good. Don't see the point in a second front facing camera. Love my M4 iPad Pro, just bought it 3 months back. Definitely not going to upgrade.
I use my iPad for most of my daily tasks (combined with the magic keyboard). This is mostly down to the built in 5G which means I don’t have to faff around connecting to client’s wifi networks. Reading papers, reports is great in tablet mode and the keyboard is (just about) big enough to touch type for extended periods.They need 16GB RAM minimum. I bought the M4 hoping to do basic modeling and graphics tasks with the pencil, which was possible, but couldn't open or save or modify anything slightly complex, which was such a wasted opportunity. I don't expect extended performance, but at least enough RAM for basic pro tasks with the Apple Pencil. I sold my M4 and was hoping for more from the M5 in particular 16GB without opting for the TB models, or 32TB for those.
I still have an M1 iPad Pro which can do the same work as the M4 with the limited RAM. I'm still getting the new M5, but I learned my lesson and will have to opt for the TB storage option which wouldn't be too bad if it offers 32GB RAM, but I am expecting it to top off at 24.
You may have forgotten, but more RAM doesn't help at all if developers can't or aren't allowed to use it.
We already had that game.
Apple puts more RAM in its devices, but because Apple of course limits the maximum amount of RAM for the software, there are actually no apps that can take advantage of the extra RAM.
I think two or three have it now, including DaVinci.
So what do you want with even more RAM if Apple “forgets” to release this performance to the competition again?
I have heard that iPadOS26 / iOS26 have started to unlock memory usage for paging / swap, not sure how accessible this is for 3rd party devs, but for Safari wouldn't it be the first to take advantage of this?The only thing I am concerned is with Safari tabs reloading. Have not experienced it yet on my 256GB M4 iPad Pro with its 8GB RAM. That being said, I don't think there will be anything noticeable immediately with the increase in RAM.
You may have forgotten, but more RAM doesn't help at all if developers can't or aren't allowed to use it.
We already had that game.
Apple puts more RAM in its devices, but because Apple of course limits the maximum amount of RAM for the software, there are actually no apps that can take advantage of the extra RAM.
I think two or three have it now, including DaVinci.
So what do you want with even more RAM if Apple “forgets” to release this performance to the competition again?
Historically, Apple has increased per app RAM availabilty over time with major OS updates.12GB up from 8GB is great, but realistically what apps on ipad will actually utilize this?
I guess all I'm saying is $1049 for m4 ipad pro 13" is a good deal considering (based on the early Russian guy leaks) there doesn't seem to be that much difference besides cpu and ram. If that's worth $250 more for the retail, than I guess that's good.Historically, Apple has increased per app RAM availabilty over time with major OS updates.
Also, multitasking support is important.
More RAM will allow more windows open without refreshing, content creation software will allow more layers, apple intelligence, games etc. There is use for it but iPad OS is very efficient with RAM, so 8 GB can still go a long way.Just grab the m4 ipad pro at Costco on sale. Great deal. 90 day return policy.
12GB up from 8GB is great, but realistically what apps on ipad will actually utilize this?