That's quite cool. Not that I need it, but I know a few who will surely like it!![]()
the iphone doesnt need the nike+ sensor/receiver - it has GPS, i guess that leaves the nike/apple collaboration at a bit of a sticking point.
please 3rd party developers - make some running software that uses GPS.
just time elapsed, distance covered, time per km for each km run, and a database to keep track of your runs - i'm sure lots of runners would happily shell out the $ on the app store!
the iphone doesnt need the nike+ sensor/receiver - it has GPS, i guess that leaves the nike/apple collaboration at a bit of a sticking point.
please 3rd party developers - make some running software that uses GPS.
just time elapsed, distance covered, time per km for each km run, and a database to keep track of your runs - i'm sure lots of runners would happily shell out the $ on the app store!
are you sure? the sensor in the shoe detects speed as well as distance, in my opinion GPS would only be able to calculate distance accurately. I don't think it would be accurate enough to detect speed.
The Nike+ is actually very inaccurate. It counts footsteps, and from the calculates speed and distance. Which is fine as long as you keep a constant stride length the entire run, but beyond the elite runners, this doesn't happen. The Nike+ calculates speed by using the formula distance/time, there is no reason that a GPS can not do the same.
So all of us who use Nike + on a treadmill would be screwed...
It's likely for us folks who already have a iPhone, and don't want to buy another device. For me, buying a Nano is just kind of silly. One more set of cables to deal with.
are you sure? the sensor in the shoe detects speed as well as distance, in my opinion GPS would only be able to calculate distance accurately. I don't think it would be accurate enough to detect speed.
Um, if the iPhone knows distance and time, it should be able to calculate speed.