I have the 1.8 I have had for years and it's one of the best purchases (for the price) I have made. There is no comparison between it and a "kit" lens at 50mm, it's very sharp. I did not notice enough difference in the 1.4 and 1.8 to warrant the price difference.
I never picked one up when it came out, but some say the 35mm 1.8 is more flexoble with the wider lens. If it were out when i got mine i may have opted for it.
Either way, these cheap prime lenses are VERY much worth the price.
Well, you asked what I (or others) would do in that context. I would tell my friend to use the viewfinder. But that's me.
the 17-55 2.8, both Nikon and Canon versions are highly regarded lenses, for DX bodies. I only have experience of Canon's version of this lens and it was fine. Equivalent to 24-70 in FX terms, and so covers the most widely used focal lengths for general photography. I believe the 17-55 2.8 is one of the "must have" DX lenses for most people.
As for price, I have no idea what they go for used, again check ebay (there are always lots available) and dealers who have used stock.
well im lens hunting again and found a deal on kijji for a nikon 18-200 VRII lens for 450. would that be a good second lens next to my 35mm prime lens and is 450 a good deal? or would you guys recomend looking at other difference lens?
I appreciate all your help in the past posts, I've leanred a great deal from you guys!