Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Anyone else disappointed not to see a bluray drive?

Hugely. I will not buy a computer now that dosen't support Blu Ray. We're WAAAAAAY past the point where that makes any sense if you like shows/movies.

The answer to the Q and A suggesting the iTunes store has the best HD movies is lame.

That is incredibly lame. Lets see. Higher prices, no rental/resale market, MUCH lower resolution video/sound quality, no extras, worse selection...
And to date Apple has NEVER SOLD A MOVIE ONLINE. Not one. Zip, zero, zilch. If something requires activation, you ARE NOT BUYING IT.

Other than those "minor" issues, sure, Apple's store is just fine :rolleyes:

I'd be glad they didn't include it. I wouldn't want to pay an extra $300 for the Bluray license. The price will come down eventually.

Is that how much it costs?

Didn't realize that, ridiculous.

As mentioned by many others, no, absolutely not. It's typically <$200 now, and that's for a slot loading drive in many of Dell's systems.

i'm a little disappointed that they didn't include a blu-ray drive in the new mbp...BUT

if they did, price will go up, they'll have to consider a HDMI port as well as a DVI port, also perhaps because of these, they will have to consider a new graphics processor

and plus as someone mentioned, 15" screen is a joke to watch Blu-ray movies on, but however, would be nice if in the future it does come with blu-ray drive and hdmi so i can connect to friend's HD TVs

No, no, no, no, no, and no. 15" is no more a joke to watch Blu Ray on than it is to do anything else on. A larger screen would always be nice, but regardless... And no, you don't need an HDMI port (though an adapter would be nice), and you should be able to adapt these to HDMI easily enough anyway...although you'd have to do audio separately. Plenty of systems have shipped with Blu Ray and no HDMI. And the 9600GT is COMPLETELY adequate for accelerating Blu Ray. The integrated 9400 won't do as good of a job, but it's fine too (heck, plenty of systems ship with INTEL'S graphics and Blu Ray).

I looked up a Dell earlier, and the Blu-ray BTO option is an extra $200. Yes, it would cost more for a slot-loading drive, but $300 more than that? Doubtful.

Nope, because Dell ships systems with slot loading Blu Ray drives that add $200 or less, and has been for months and months.

I also can't understand why this fact is so hard to point out: If you buy a new movie on Blu-ray (Iron Man, for example), YOU DON'T WANT TO HAVE TO BUY A DVD AS WELL. I mean holy G-D it, I can't explain this any plainer. I have the five Harry Potter movies on BD, so I have one place I can watch them. The fact that I have a 720p television and a Blu-ray Disc player proves that I DON'T NEED THE TOP RESOLUTION.

YES! Couldn't say it better! What, I have to buy and rent separate movies because I can't run them on my laptop?

There are more notebook (not just apple) without bluray than with one.

Yes, and there are also more notebooks with integrated graphics than real GPUs. That's not a compelling argument for me to rush out and buy some low end junk.

And the price difference between new DVDs and Blu Rays isn't as big as you're making it out to be typically, and even if it were, we should still have that option. Geez, Blu Ray is now cheaper than DVD prices were when I was buying tons of shows on DVD.
 
As laptops go it's absolutely pointless and as a format really, there isn't much need for it anymore baring HD movies in the front room.

Storage? It's old hat, who really stores stuff on DVD's anymore? I haven't burned a disc in years or been given one. You can buy a 200GB external drive thats smaller than the iphone for moving stuff. The people who would actually use it are a small minority of potential buyers.

It would eat battery life and drive the price up and maybe the other specs' down.

Everything will be digital soon enough, blue-ray seems to be a semi stop gap that Sony haven't took advantage of and company's like Apple and Microsoft are stalling it with great download services.
 
As laptops go it's absolutely pointless and as a format really, there isn't much need for it anymore baring HD movies in the front room.

Not much need...unless, you know, you LIKE TV AND MOVIES. Which many people do :D

The people who would actually use it are a small minority of potential buyers.

Yeah! Who likes TV or movies? Those are such strange things. I sure don't! I only sip lattes as I read books published prior to 1860! :p

It would eat battery life and drive the price up and maybe the other specs' down.

How would it manage to do either of those things? If you're not playing a movie, it's not sapping battery life. If you make it optional, it's not adding to the price (and for the prices Apple charges they could give you multiple Blu Ray drives if they wanted to).

Everything will be digital soon enough

Uh...Blu Ray is digital. If you're talking about these cheesy download services, lets HOPE they never take off in their current form.

Higher prices, no rental/resale market, MUCH lower resolution video/sound quality, no extras, worse selection...
And to date Apple has NEVER SOLD A MOVIE ONLINE. Not one. Zip, zero, zilch. If something requires activation, you ARE NOT BUYING IT.

Sure, Blu Ray is a "stop gap" in the way DVD is...although if anything it'll probably be with us as DVD could have been on the market for 50 years, had it been possible to make it when color TVs first came out. As it is, we won't really need a replacement for Blu Ray until ATSC gets replaced, and that hopefully won't be for decades, if not longer.
 
Apple always seems to be the first to adopt many things, but for this blu ray rejection(?), they want to wait and see. hmmm. I think there's more than just money.
 
Apple always seems to be the first to adopt many things, but for this blu ray rejection(?), they want to wait and see. hmmm. I think there's more than just money.

I think they're usually behind the times. They were slow with DVD. Slow with CD-RW, etc. This dosen't really surprise me that they're so far behind, other than that they're actually an early supporter of the format, so I hoped that meant they were on the ball and would be one of the first (instead of dead last) out of the gate.

Honestly a company in 2008 that dosen't sell Blu Ray equipped computers at ALL? Not so hot...
 
Did they? I thought the were a bit behind on that, but I might not be remembering right. I know they put DVD-RAM drives in early, but then...

And they were way behind on DVD and CD-RW, and then combo drives, and they STILL sell a system without DVD+/-RW...which at this point borders on some kind of art :D
 
I'd be glad they didn't include it. I wouldn't want to pay an extra $300 for the Bluray license. The price will come down eventually.

Not even close, Plenty of PC laptops available with Blu-ray for around $1200-$1300. The problem is they are all 12.5mm drives that will not fit in Apple's thin laptops (only the current 17" uses a 12.5mm drive).

Just look at how expensive a replacement Superdrive is for the MB or 15" MBP compared to a MBP 17.

Until a reasonably priced 9.5mm slot-load Blu-ray is available, Apple will (most likely) not offer the option.

Cheers,
 
I don't think HDCP is in yet. Besides, you can strip it between a device and a monitor, or if the drive is attached to a computer, you can use players that will remove it.
 
… The next person to mention digital downloads is going to get a big "iTunes doesn't sell HD movies" slap in the face!

a good argument and i Phil Schiller used this as an arguement aswell but some countries like mine dont have unlimited downloads and so downloading an HD movie chugs thru our download limits.
 
Reminds me of how some American was bitching about 250GB download limit. lol, that's a lot of Linux distros. ;)
 
I would buy a macbook pro when it has:

1.HD 1080p screen (1920x1080)
2.blu-ray
3.quad-core cpu
4.ability to fully run games like crysis at native resolution and highest settings at 50fps or higher = similar performance as HD4850 on desktop
5.cheaper SSD upgrade
6.new OS

This is what I think is good value of money. How long do I have to wait?
 
I would buy a macbook pro when it has:

1.HD 1080p screen (1920x1080)
2.blu-ray
3.quad-core cpu
4.ability to fully run games like crysis at native resolution and highest settings at 50fps or higher = similar performance as HD4850 on desktop
5.cheaper SSD upgrade
6.new OS

This is what I think is good value of money. How long do I have to wait?
Wait 2 years. Could you name another laptop on the market that can do all that?
 
i was under the impression that there were NO 9.5mm slot loading BluRay drives available on the market..... :rolleyes:

I know there is a 12.7mm version and I was under the impression that a 9.5mm version was also available. The problem right now is quality vs. price. The slot loading Blu-ray drives are very expensive and very slow at the moment. That doesn't really help them all that much.
 
I know there is a 12.7mm version and I was under the impression that a 9.5mm version was also available. The problem right now is quality vs. price. The slot loading Blu-ray drives are very expensive and very slow at the moment. That doesn't really help them all that much.

toshiba has announced one, as has panasonic and sony.. i am yet to see/find any proof that they are actually available.
 
I would buy a macbook pro when it has:

1.HD 1080p screen (1920x1080)
2.blu-ray
3.quad-core cpu
4.ability to fully run games like crysis at native resolution and highest settings at 50fps or higher = similar performance as HD4850 on desktop
5.cheaper SSD upgrade
6.new OS

This is what I think is good value of money. How long do I have to wait?

i know your being a smart arse, but im gonna bite anyway..

1. hope you have very thick glasses.
2. hope you like your 17" MBP's
3. hope you have lots of money
4. goodluck with that..
5. meh
6. wait till next year!
 
Maybe apple should go around hdcp in OS.
Just add bd drive to laptop or sell external one and put hdmi output to it.
Then add hdmi input to standalone & computers' displays.
In laptops this cabling could be internal.
It would be also very nice to be able to use iMac's screen with stb/bd-player/ps3...
 
hmmm...something just came to mind.
To play blu-ray movies, doesn't the display need to be able to handle HDCP?

I don't think HDCP is in yet. Besides, you can strip it between a device and a monitor, or if the drive is attached to a computer, you can use players that will remove it.

You don't need HDCP on the monitor if it's built into the laptop. So long as the graphics card is HDCP-compliant, it'll play just fine. I do this with my MBP on occasion (although I have to boot from Win XP and use my external BR-ROM drive to do it). I can also play to my Samsung 40" LCD HDTV, too, but only if I turn off my MBP display in Win XP.
 
I would buy a macbook pro when it has:

1.HD 1080p screen (1920x1080)
2.blu-ray
3.quad-core cpu
4.ability to fully run games like crysis at native resolution and highest settings at 50fps or higher = similar performance as HD4850 on desktop
5.cheaper SSD upgrade
6.new OS

This is what I think is good value of money. How long do I have to wait?

Years and years for a lot of those. You can get FAIRLY close right now with an upcoming (if it hasn't already launched) HP laptop, and one Dell Precision has most of that except I think no Blu Ray built in (BOO!) and there is no mobile equivalent to the 4850, though the 9800GTX is still awesome.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.