I disagree. I’ve created a poll - https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/whats-the-most-premium-looking-new-iphone.2467627/
Your poll isn’t a representation of the people outside these and forums and means little to be honest.
I disagree. I’ve created a poll - https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/whats-the-most-premium-looking-new-iphone.2467627/
Ok, if you say so pal.Your poll isn’t a representation of the people outside these and forums and means little to be honest.
To be honest if I had an older phone like a 14 pro max I would have upgraded to iPhone 17 it’s just if you have a recent pro max like 15 or 16 the 17 is a downgrade . The 17 is amazing value and I do think it’s the best all rounderI’m seeing relatively little discussion (here and elsewhere online) about the base model iPhone 17.
Seems like all of the hype and interest are around the Pros and the Air, even though the iPhone 17 has the most compelling overall package among base models in recent memory.
You already answered your own question. On these forums and online in general, the people discussing iPhones are mostly enthusiasts who buy something other than the base model. However, I’m quite sure the base model will end up being the best-selling one in the whole lineup, the only one that might outsell it is the Air.
I personally think that base model is easily best value for regular user, especially this year.
Lowest specs and lowest price is the 16e, quite a difference in both from the 17. The 17 is also competitive with the 16 Pro, which I don’t think happened before in that way.Base models are base models. The lowest spec's and lowest price. Perhaps the base model is of little interest to the majority of people looking at iPhone's?
Lowest specs and lowest price is the 16e, quite a difference in both from the 17. The 17 is also competitive with the 16 Pro, which I don’t think happened before in that way.
any words about heat? my iphone15 pro ist like a portable oven and i am so sic of itPersonally loving my base 17
The major thing is probably the ProMotion display and thinner bezels. I’ve wanted this for awhile now and they finally did it, and with no compromises to the version that Pro phones have had. Then the added details around the display: better scratch resistance (I use my phone with no case and no screen protector) and anti-reflection coating (not a huge factor, but it helps).So you're a great case study; what was it about the 17 base model that made you jump, especially given you came from the 16?
My personal pet peeve with the 16e is its lack of MagSafe, and that it could be $100 less, and ideally it would have a completely flush camera. Otherwise I think it’s really fine.For me I feel that Apple treats the SE series and now the 16e as the ugly stepchild while the regular 16 and 17 are the actual base models.![]()
My personal pet peeve with the 16e is its lack of MagSafe, and that it could be $100 less, and ideally it would have a completely flush camera. Otherwise I think it’s really fine.
The only reason I didn’t use the SE2/3 is that it’s wider and heavier than the mini, and that I dislike the rounded edge. Originally I had an iPhone 6, but found it too large compared to the 5, and the edges too slippery, and therefore upgraded to the SE1 when it came out, and then to the mini (I was still disappointed that it was larger and heavier than the SE1, but at least it was narrower than the 6 and had flat edges).