Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Re: iTunes != iPod

Originally posted by Blackcat
Why do people want an iTunes update to make their iPod do more? That would be an iPod update (or in the case of AAC, both).
Because iTunes is how you move data TO an iPod.. at least it is the current "Apple" way to move data to an iPod. So either a new app (iCal itself), or an update to iTunes is necessary to move iCal data to an iPod. Personally, I would think that iCal would do the data transfer/manipulation itself... but who knows with Apple.
 
Re: Re: iTunes != iPod

Originally posted by IndyGopher

Because iTunes is how you move data TO an iPod.. at least it is the current "Apple" way to move data to an iPod. So either a new app (iCal itself), or an update to iTunes is necessary to move iCal data to an iPod. Personally, I would think that iCal would do the data transfer/manipulation itself... but who knows with Apple.


yeah, i'm pretty sure that ical will handle the calendar transfer... unless that will be isync? but i was pretty sure isync was bluetooth based...

and as you said, knowing apple, they may try to make it one click for both music and calendar syncing... which i don't think would ideal. maybe that option, but i'd definitely like to be able to load/update a calendar without dealing with music at the same time..

and yeah, itunes update to include aac support and encoding. and then the ipod update for aac support.....
 
You *can* transfer Calendar items...

If you already use Entourage, just click and drag your events from the Calendar to the "Calendar" directory on your iPod. It's not automatic, but it's very cool. If you don't use Entourage, any application that uses .ics files will work; otherwise, you'll have to wait for iCal.
 
what if they dropped the low end 14 in. iBook to make way for the speculated "special-edition" book?

even as i'm typing i cant convince myself this would happen...at least anytime soon....that'd be awfully nice though....

katchow
 
Re: Re: iTunes != iPod

Originally posted by IndyGopher

Because iTunes is how you move data TO an iPod.. at least it is the current "Apple" way to move data to an iPod. So either a new app (iCal itself), or an update to iTunes is necessary to move iCal data to an iPod. Personally, I would think that iCal would do the data transfer/manipulation itself... but who knows with Apple.

Indeed, Apple likes to keep things seperate, so iCal will do calendering, AddressBook will do contacts and iTunes will do music. They can all sync to iPod.

This again suggests iSync is for something we don't yet have...
 
iSync

It would make sense that Apple has created a Mac OS X API that makes it easy to sync devices using the SyncML standard (http://www.syncml.org).

The "iSync" application is just the application that Steve Jobs demo'd at the last MacWorld. It makes sense that "iSync" would just be recognizing the different "devices" that are plugged and available for synchronization of different "services" such as calendaring, music, email, etc.

So, "iSync" would be providing the window that shows the different devices and allows you to choose which ones you want to synchronize. You will probably also be able to do this from within the applications. However, the applications are probably relying on Apple's "SyncML API".

By making this an API, other developers can take advantage of it and easily allow their applications to synchronize with devices, as well.
 
What happened to Motorola?

What's happened to Motorola?

Now is the time Motorola could finally pick up some desktop market share. Apple's Unix operating system makes Microsoft irrelevent. Now you can develop from laptop to unix server.
So apple has all the software pieces in place.

But, Motorola is badly trailing.
If Apple can get a 1Ghz 7450 for a laptop it can't delay because of slow sales! It already is behind in the hardware race. It needs these numbers to look competitive.

Or is it pricing. Is Steve trying to preserve fat profit margins.
Maybe Motorola and Apple should shave some hardware profit for some marketshare gains.
 
What about a new studio display?

I for one was/am hoping for a widescreen format mid-range ADC display. It seems odd that you can get a widescreen 17" iMac but if you want a flat screen for your Powermac you either can have a regular 17" Studio or pay absolute squillions to jump to a 22" Cinema display.

It doesnt really make sense so I was figuring that as the iMac is now out an addition the screen displays was going to be imminent. Apparently not Paris though, which is a real shame.
 
This is the latest from www.cube-zone.com :

Several web sites are currently claiming that there will be no new hardware announced tomorrow. Our sources think those sites are wrong. According to them, there will probably be updated PowerBooks and/or iBooks (stop-gap updates, before the rumored dual PowerBooks which is supposed to be announced later).... and an iPhone.

We really don't know if this is true, but our sources have been right in the past. Let's think about it :

* Steve Jobs will be in Paris. His keynote will take place before Phill Schiller speaks. That may mean an announcement.
* The keynote is September 10th. Just one day before September 11th. Let's face it : the newspaper will have articles about New York, not about an iPhone or new PowerBooks.
* The Apple Store has been unavailable today (it is available again now) : that may indicate something new is coming....
* Steve Jobs has to announce something after last year's cancellation.... or maybe he will just offer a free copy of Jaguar to people who attend the keynote... (Well this is only my dream...)
* Some web Sites such as ThinkSecret say "Apple sources confirmed that economic and sales conditions are becoming increasingly important in determining new product releases" : sure...when you're not selling a old product well, what is the best way to sell it better? produce and sell a new one...
* One last thing... We went to the Expo today. We didn't see a lot of PowerBooks on the Apple booth. However the ones who were there just looked like the current ones...But we could not see what's inside....

If only to throw a spanner in the works...

I do love the idea of an iPhone - perhaps a nice little digital still camera incorporated inside the casing. Wouldn't that sell like mad?

😎
 
EOL

About 4 weeks back there was a rumour Powerbooks were EOL in Europe. If this is the case it means something bigger than speedbumps as products are not EOLd for updates.

I don't buy the dual CPU thing. Sure it's possible but it would be costly and hot hot hot.
 
Re: iTunes != iPod

Originally posted by Blackcat
Why do people want an iTunes update to make their iPod do more? That would be an iPod update (or in the case of AAC, both).

Of course iTunes 3 can play AAC simply because Quicktime can! If Apple added AAC encoding to iTunes, this would still require a QT pro license because AAC is not a free technology AFAIK.

I wonder if the iPod *can* play AAC at all? Does anybody know wether MP3 playback is a hardware thing on the iPod? Can AAC playback be done with a simple firmware upgrade?
 
Re: Re: iTunes != iPod

Originally posted by pianojoe


Of course iTunes 3 can play AAC simply because Quicktime can! If Apple added AAC encoding to iTunes, this would still require a QT pro license because AAC is not a free technology AFAIK.

MP3 is not a free technology either. Apple has to pay Thomson at least US$ 2.50 per encoding unit sold($5 if they use Fraunhofer's libraries), according to Thomson's MP3 licensing web page.

I cannot find any annual cap on these fees.
 
Re: Re: iTunes != iPod

Originally posted by pianojoe


I wonder if the iPod *can* play AAC at all? Does anybody know wether MP3 playback is a hardware thing on the iPod? Can AAC playback be done with a simple firmware upgrade?

The final noteworthy item on the iPod's PCB actually turns out to be the unit's CPU. The chip is a PP5002B-C chip made by PortalPlayer. Although the specifications of the version of the chip used in the iPod are not available on PortyalPlayer's website, specifications on their P5001 controller are available. Bearing the similar product names, we can speculate that not much has changed in the Apple specific chip. If this is in fact the case, then the PP5002B chip has a ARM7 TDMI based core with a coprocessor dedicated to real time encoding acceleration. The processor is able to not only decode MP3 and wma files (note that the iPod's chip can decode MP3 files up to 320 Kbps, MP3 variable bit rate, WAV, and AIFF files), it is also able to encode on the fly (a feature which Apple did not take advantage of in the iPod). The chip also features an integrated 32KB of SRAM and 8KB of cache. We are unsure of the operating frequency of the chip or how many MIPS the chip can handle, but the iPod never functioned slowly suggesting that there is plenty of power.


Looks like it's hardware. Maybe the chip supports AAC from a firmeware upgrade, hell I don't know. clickety
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.