Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It was a very strange update. I have been trying to find a reason to replace my older 6 with the Ultra 3 (or "updated" 2 as it turns out) but the 10 has s10 SiP and a much faster charge time than the Ultra. Surely logic would dictate they at least give the Ultra 2 these features. And it is circa $450 AUD cheaper.
 
Casio, Timex, and Swatch don't have a $30 billion annual R&D budget.
It is also VERY difficult to have health advancements annually. Not only do they have to develop the tech, they usually have to get approval from the health regulators of every country it’s sold in. Hell, my country STILL doesn’t have ECG and arrhythmia detection. It’s not as simple as throwing money at it and finding annual success. There is a lot of red tape that goes along with it. Just look at the Blood Oxygen sensor in America right now. At least I have THAT where I live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LlamaLarry
I think the AW Ultra 2 is still up to 1000 nits brighter than AW 10. Also - has dual frequency GPS. The Ultra 2 has such long battery life, it would be hard to go back to normal AW, although the thinner and lighter AW 10 look nice.
How long does your Ultra2 last? I'm tempted to get this AWS10 but my last WAS3 had quite a poor battery life. I got annoyed charging every night, and eventually battery got swollen and broke the watch. Ultra2 is tempting, but pricey. For that amount I could get great Garmin watch with 10x the battery life. Damn you apple ecosystem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Someyoungguy
It was a very strange update. I have been trying to find a reason to replace my older 6 with the Ultra 3 (or "updated" 2 as it turns out) but the 10 has s10 SiP and a much faster charge time than the Ultra. Surely logic would dictate they at least give the Ultra 2 these features. And it is circa $450 AUD cheaper.

I didn't pay attention to the battery difference, but the Ultra 2 will still give you more charge throughout the day, correct?

EDIT: Did some homework. Ultra 2: 36 hours battery Series 10: 18 hours
 
Last edited:
It was a very strange update. I have been trying to find a reason to replace my older 6 with the Ultra 3 (or "updated" 2 as it turns out) but the 10 has s10 SiP and a much faster charge time than the Ultra. Surely logic would dictate they at least give the Ultra 2 these features. And it is circa $450 AUD cheaper.
The Ultra takes longer to charge because it has a larger battery. Just like a 32 gallon gas tank in a car takes longer to fill up than a 14 gallon gas tank, with flow rate being equal.
 
It was a very strange update. I have been trying to find a reason to replace my older 6 with the Ultra 3 (or "updated" 2 as it turns out) but the 10 has s10 SiP and a much faster charge time than the Ultra. Surely logic would dictate they at least give the Ultra 2 these features. And it is circa $450 AUD cheaper.
Shareholder value and executive annual bonus > logic
 
I know it’s a trivial and minor issue, but I was quite disappointed last night.

I’m on an iPhone 14P and an AWS6 cellular.
I’ve been getting into more and more exercise and really fancied the idea of a new Ultra, but was also expecting a HUGE and significant change for the AW10 as it’s the 10y-anniversary.

To the end, I was thinking, maybe there’s a “oh and one more thing” as a twist from Tim Apple and a nice reference, but nothing came.

So now I don’t even understand the idea behind it. The Ultra didn’t even get an updated chip, no word mentioning the anniversary and instead all I heard the whole evening was AI, AI, AI.
 
So no-one is talking about blood oxygen sensor being completely dropped out starting with Series 10?
It's there for those who don't live in the US:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-09-10 at 9.13.42 PM.png
    Screenshot 2024-09-10 at 9.13.42 PM.png
    233.3 KB · Views: 65
Lackluster update for me. The series 9 had more pull to get me from my series 5.

Give me a matte finish dark colour watch. This glossy stuff is hideous and the alternative is a silver or gold.
Thanks but no thanks Apple, I’ll keep my 5 for yet another year.
 
The standard watch updates are good. The Ultra still has a long ways to go to compete with Garmin watches. The sleep apnea detection is tempting to me, but I still need what my Garmin Epix 2 Pro brings over what Apple offers.
Oe, Epix 2 Pro. That's the model with AMOLED display, right? A fantastic watch! I don't think Apple will ever release an Apple Watch like that. Heck, they'll never add ANT+, so an Watch is quite useless for runners and cyclists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdawgnoonan
Are we at all going to expect the new watch faces from the S10 to be available on the Ultra 2.
Seems ridiculous to have a category leading product have less features to a newly designed mid range.

This is starting to feel like when they brought app drawer to the iPhone and not iPad just to give them something to push 12 months later.
 
I would’ve finally considered my 1st Apple Watch had they introduced the blood pressure monitoring that was rumored this year, it would’ve been helpful.

No longer interested and it can wait another year.
Also worth remembering that the rumours were never that you’d get numbers. Just if it’s trending upwards over time.

If you have a condition which requires blood pressure monitoring then the watch would not be sufficient.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.