I think people want it to be more steps than it is. They want to feel as if they’ve done something.
Not me! Just set it and use it. I like it simple.
I think people want it to be more steps than it is. They want to feel as if they’ve done something.
Not me! Just set it and use it. I like it simple.
First link is dead.
I always had scenario 3 prior to the update because my TV is Atmos compatible. It showed even though I had my speakers turned off in the TV’s settings. I’ve always used my HomePods with this TV.
Sorry you can’t seem to get it to workNo, it’s not more “steps” it’s giving users control over features and hardware. Don’t buy into the Apple BS.
Agreed. Very impressed with the raw power and enveloping sound.For what it’s worth, I connected my stereo paired 14.2/updated HomePods to my 4K Apple TV and am very impressed with much better they sound compared with the powered stereo speakers I usually use.
Strange, is not dead for me.
Not my case. For example, in Disney+, if I have the internal speakers of my TV selected, the Atmos logo appears in content with an Atmos track. However, if I choose the Homepods in the control center of the ATV, a 5.1 tag appears instead of the Atmos one.
This is was also the case with Netflix and Itunes Movies/Apple TV+ prior 14.2 when outputting the audio through the Homepods. No Atmos logo. Now, after 14,2 update, it appears.
It doesn´t appear in Disney yet, maybe the app needs to be updated to support the home theatre feature of the homepods.
I hope that Apple keeps improving the wireless connection between the Homepods and the ATV, and in the future you can add two more homepods for rear/ discrete surround channels.
I think much of this will be on an app by app basis on how it will be displayed. I haven’t selected my HomePods from Control Center since the update. There’s probably bugs will need to fix, but I’m satisfied. Everything I’ve watched, no matter the format, has sounded better.
I notice, that Atmos tracks get different treatment already from the studio. Take Beatles' recent Abbey Road as an example. It has 3 renderings of the same soundtrack:This is very true and I agree.
What about height channels? Atmos is not about bass, but about additional layer of sound, coming from your ceiling. Some call it nicely - "Voice of God".The HomePod's are better for dialogue but don't have anywhere near the bass that the Sonos Playbase has.
I notice, that Atmos tracks get different treatment already from the studio. Take Beatles' recent Abbey Road as an example. It has 3 renderings of the same soundtrack:
- Dolby Atmos
- PCM 2.0 (192kHz, 24-bit)
- DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 (96kHz, 24-bit)
And the Atmos track has got significant bass treatment compared to the other 2. So the difference is not only thanks to format, but comes from the mastering.
But I am more interested in how do the HomePods handle Atmos' height channels
What about height channels? Atmos is not about bass, but about additional layer of sound, coming from your ceiling. Some call it nicely - "Voice of God".
How do HomePods handle that? Their only upfiring speaker is the woofer, though. I do not understand, how is it supposed to work?
I'm definitely no audiophile. I did notice much more of a 360 degree sound with the HomePods and that's actually really nice. We can hear just as well in the kitchen off to the side as sitting on the couch in front of the tv. I need to do more testing however; I didn't get a whole lot of time to play around with it yesterday.What about height channels? Atmos is not about bass, but about additional layer of sound, coming from your ceiling. Some call it nicely - "Voice of God".
How do HomePods handle that? Their only upfiring speaker is the woofer, though. I do not understand, how is it supposed to work?
I dont understand it either. But there are "ceilings sounds" -excuse my English-. Lots of directionality, spatial sound, very dynamic and fulfilling soundstage. Left to right, right to left, up and down. I would compare it to a 3.1 system with upfiring channels. What I didn´t experience at all is rear channels/surround efects. Nothing behind me. Still, the result is very impressive for what the speakers are.
So it seems HomePods are definitely processing that additional information and uses HRTF to achieve virtual height sound effect.This has been my experience too. Though I have nothing to compare it too. But I definitely heard sounds that were above. The demo in the Dolby Summit app was impressive!
So it seems HomePods are definitely processing that additional information and uses HRTF to achieve virtual height sound effect.
Thank you for the hint on Dolby Summit app, will definitely take a look!
Like many things I am 100% sure they can and the ATV be made to decode and output L/R/C/R and by adding EQ LFE. Now whether our Apple overlord will ”allow” it is another story.The question is... if the Homepods can process the Atmos metadata and simulate height channels, how come they cant do the same with rear/surround channels?. The sound is enveloping and fullfilling, and the soundscape impressive, but the sound is definitely in front of you.
Could this be improved in future software updates?
I would kinda love it if we could use HomePod Minis as surrounds. I've been using Sonos Play:1's as surrounds for a while; same principle - no?
That is what aTV already does. It is now a question on how does aTV really send the sound to HPods. AirTunes used to be decoded ALAC stream. But in the era of AirPlaying movies, the whole unaltered stream seems to be just copied to the AP target. This would actually leave stream decoding to HomePods. Which they should well be capable of.Like many things I am 100% sure they can and the ATV be made to decode and output L/R/C/R and by adding EQ LFE. Now whether our Apple overlord will ”allow” it is another story.
Well, you don't have to. Just trust your ears.I’m not a speaker tech geek.
You don't need full range speakers for RL & RR channels. However, I agree that the "ideal" setup would be full size HomePods all around + a sub which in the scheme of things would not be very expensive and could sound pretty darn good and much easier for the average Joe to setup than a dedicated 5.1 system.The hypothesis, that’s been floating around here and on Reddit, for why we can’t is because the minis are aren’t a good match for the full size HomePods. So in order for them to sound cohesive the full size HomePods would need to have their sound diminished in order to play nice with the minis. That’s a sacrifice wasn’t willing to make.
I don’t know if it’s true or not. I’m not a speaker tech geek.
Yes.If you are using a pair of Homepods with an AppleTv4K, can the AppleTV remote adjust the volume of the HomePods? I want to be able to use a single remote and not a phone app.
Thanks. Having a single remote is important for she who must be obeyed.Yes.
Thanks. Having a single remote is important for she who must be obeyed.