Originally posted by AidenShaw
The left computer is compatible with one download service and one player (note that the right computer is compatible with this service and player as well).
my home system is made of heavy gauge aluminum, painted a dark charcoal with an aluminum/charcoal front.
Originally posted by AidenShaw
The right computer is compatible with many music download services, and portable music players.
The left computer is compatible with one download service and one player (note that the right computer is compatible with this service and player as well).
wow, how much freaking porn do you store in a Desktop machine? I'm guessing you have a mirrored SCSI set to boot from.. just guessing... but 8 Hard drives? I bought a 120GB for my athlon and took the 40GB out. Now granted... PC users sometimes find the need to install 2 or more OSes to suit all their needs.. but geez.Originally posted by AidenShaw
ps: In mine, I have 2 Ultra 320 SCSI drives, 8 ATA133 drives, floppy, SCSI tape drive, a DVD+- writer and a CD-RW writer.
wow, just when I was thinking Aiden is over 15. Maybe he's got rich parents to pay for all those hard drives. It would explain the need for that much drive space in a desktop though.
And to the dork-breath...
to each his own. I actually like the handles. They do make it easy to move around and I like the aesthetic. In fact I like the cheeze grater. it's kind of bad ass industrial imho, but I fully grant you the right to hate it.
Oh - BTW, the case on the right doesn't wast 4 inches of height on some nonsense handles....
Originally posted by AidenShaw
The reason we "PC people" don't get so worked up is that the machine is just a tool, just a part of our lives. Our self-identity is with other parts of our lives (work, hobbies, sports, family) - it's not tied up with a "brand-name experience" with the company that manufactured our computer [/B]
Hold on there, mister. Lemme see your joke license paperwork. I claim that I made up that joke waaaaaaay back in 2003. Here's my post.Originally posted by SeaFox
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the joke rumors were true in the end.
The Cube is coming back!
...as a Sphere!
Alright! Alright! It was only a joke. Stop throwing stuff at me!![]()
Originally posted by Duff-Man
Duff-man says.....you forgot to add....case on right - industrial design by a sixth grade shop class (at best)....oh yeah!
K back on track does anyone think that Microsoft will do such a good job on VPC 7 that we could play games on it ( crosses foingers and prays)Originally posted by Rower_CPU
The aluminum PC case so heavily discussed above is the CoolerMaster ATC-200. It was a great case when it first came out a couple of years ago. I had one and loved it, though it was very loud when loaded with fans.
You still won't find cases like that being used by the likes of Dell, HP or Gateway.
Folks let's get back on track now. OK?
Originally posted by Ling
Hey! We can use the WalMart music site too!!!! *snicker* I'm not trying to bash the PC world here...but Windows Media blows. Come on...admit it.
Now...everyone play nice!!!!
as a former windows user i can safly say i was no were near this excied in fact i wasnt bothered at all with there so called product update??Originally posted by jZilla
I refuse to believe ANY PC luser gets this hyped about anything to do with their machine.
It's why I'd hate to see the entire world use Apple.
I admit it, I like being "unique" bar the like-minds that have the good sense to go Mac.
As long as my dual 2ghz G5 isn't announced as outdated and overpriced I'll be happy ;-)
Originally posted by TomSmithMacEd
We lost what the whole topic is really about.
Originally posted by AidenShaw
True, but if the computer is just a tool - what tasks can't you do on the right computer that you *can* do on the left.
Originally posted by mattmack
K back on track does anyone think that Microsoft will do such a good job on VPC 7 that we could play games on it ( crosses foingers and prays)![]()
Originally posted by Sir_Giggles
It's cooler to have a fatter wallet than a thinner wallet regardless of what anyone tells you otherwise.
Originally posted by iomar
Finally, I hope this new version of Virtual PC is fast enough to use.
Originally posted by AidenShaw
![]()
Hmmmmmm.
Computer case on left - one optical drive, requires vendor's proprietary case
Computer case on right - up to 3 optical drives, any industry standard drive - or any commodity 3.5" disk...
Computer case on left - no small removeable drive.
Computer case on right - two standard floppy or zip drives, or two commodity 3.5 inch drives.
Computer case on left - two SATA drives
Computer case on right - six SATA or PATA drives (up to 11 drives if you replace optical and small removeable with 3.5" drives)
But, unfortunately, the case on the right doesn't look like a cheese grater....
ps: In mine, I have 2 Ultra 320 SCSI drives, 8 ATA133 drives, floppy, SCSI tape drive, a DVD+- writer and a CD-RW writer.
And to the dork-breath who complained about the open optical slot, the case manufacturer assumes that you'll be putting in at least one optical drive - so the brushed aluminum filler panel for that slot isn't in the default config.
Oh - BTW, the case on the right doesn't wast 4 inches of height on some nonsense handles....
Originally posted by AidenShaw
True, but if the computer is just a tool - what tasks can't you do on the right computer that you *can* do on the left.
The right computer is compatible with many music download services, and portable music players.
The left computer is compatible with one download service and one player (note that the right computer is compatible with this service and player as well).
Note that "doesn't run OS X" is nowhere close to "isn't a suitable tool for my problems"....
The cliche comment would be "Get a life...".
Originally posted by ffakr
The big problem with VPC is that it emulates a low end generic video chipset. It doesn't take advantage of the features of any recent chipsets.
MS could probably upgrade the VPC engine to use the real video chipsets in the Mac. They did something similar with with the Voodoo's in the past. You could actually use a voodoo driver in VPC that accessed the voodoo2 passthrough card directly and you could actually play games (slightly slowly) in VPC.
The G5s are pretty damn fast but I'm not holding my breath for decent game support. For starters...
- you need to get native access to the video hardware.. which would be a lot of work considering you'd want to support GF 2-4s and Radeons up to 9800s.
- you need to work around the removal of the pseudo-little endian mode in the G5. Bochs doesn't seem to run very well without it.
- you STILL need to emulate all the PC code no matter what you do and your PC game won't suffer slow execution of the AI code.
If VPC can provide on the software/driver front.. the G5 may have horsepower to run some decent PC games, but the requirements are always going up. I'd be shocked if you'd see a dual 2GHz run emulated x86 code fast enough to make something like Doom3 playable.. heck even the PC version of Halo.
Maybe we do need those 3GHz G5s like gekko was promising.
;-)
LOL!!!Originally posted by Skull Leader
That's good, since there aren't any drugs on this planet that will make you sleep THAT long without killing you...![]()